TY - JOUR
T1 - Extending feminist pedagogy in conferences
T2 - inspiration from Theatre of the Oppressed
AU - Belliappa, Jyothsna Latha
N1 - Funding Information:
I am deeply grateful to Rekha Chari, Mallya Aditi International School, Sonia Jose, Srishti Institute of Art, Design and Technology, Anna Porroche-Escudero, Lancaster University, and Rosemary Lucy Hill, University of Huddersfield, for their comments on this paper. I also thank the two anonymous reviewers, and guest editors, Emily Henderson and James Burford, whose thoughtful suggestions strengthened my arguments. As always, I am indebted to Ajai Narendran for help with references. Finally, a big thank you to Radha Ramaswamy and Ravi Ramaswamy for including me in the 2014 Diversity Dialogues Conference, which enabled me to develop the ideas articulated here.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019, © 2019 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2020/1/2
Y1 - 2020/1/2
N2 - This paper employs an autobiographical approach to reflect on some limitations of conventional academic conferences in creating community and supporting deep learning. By and large conventional large conferences tend to be premised on what Brazilian educator Paulo Freire calls the banking model of education and therefore frequently reproduce prevalent academic hierarchies. Examining some feminist ways of conferencing, I argue that while they offer valuable opportunities for dialogue and reflection, they do not radically alter the canonised conferencing model of keynotes, plenaries and parallel presentations. I then reflect on my experience of attending a national conference of Theatre of the Oppressed (TO) practitioners in Bangalore, India, in 2014, framing it through the lens of feminist and critical pedagogy. I conclude that TO with its commitment to equity offers inspiration for re-imagining academic conferences to make them more inclusive of marginalised groups and to support professional and personal growth.
AB - This paper employs an autobiographical approach to reflect on some limitations of conventional academic conferences in creating community and supporting deep learning. By and large conventional large conferences tend to be premised on what Brazilian educator Paulo Freire calls the banking model of education and therefore frequently reproduce prevalent academic hierarchies. Examining some feminist ways of conferencing, I argue that while they offer valuable opportunities for dialogue and reflection, they do not radically alter the canonised conferencing model of keynotes, plenaries and parallel presentations. I then reflect on my experience of attending a national conference of Theatre of the Oppressed (TO) practitioners in Bangalore, India, in 2014, framing it through the lens of feminist and critical pedagogy. I conclude that TO with its commitment to equity offers inspiration for re-imagining academic conferences to make them more inclusive of marginalised groups and to support professional and personal growth.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85076541020&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85076541020&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/09540253.2019.1646412
DO - 10.1080/09540253.2019.1646412
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85076541020
SN - 0954-0253
VL - 32
SP - 101
EP - 114
JO - Gender and Education
JF - Gender and Education
IS - 1
ER -