Facilitators and barriers to using neurological outcome measures in developed and developing countries

Marika Demers, Andréanne K. Blanchette, Aditi A. Mullick, Akash Shah, Kathleen Woo, John Solomon, Mindy F. Levin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: To identify and compare factors influencing the use of standardized outcome measures by neurological physical therapists working in representative developed (Canada) and developing (India) countries. Methods: A self-administered web-based questionnaire on facilitators and barriers to using neurological outcome measures was sent by email to neurological physical therapists in Canada and India. Frequencies of responses to each question were computed. Differences between countries were assessed using two-proportion z test. Results: Of 317 respondents, the use of standardized outcome measures was higher for Indian (96.7%) compared with Canadian physical therapists (89.2%). Among the most highly reported facilitators, three were common for both countries (known validity and reliability, outcome measures learned in professional training, and recommended in clinical practice guidelines). Three highly reported barriers were also common for India and Canada (lack of time, relying on judgement for clinical decisions, and unavailability of the assessment tools). Nevertheless, there were differences in the percentages of barriers and facilitators between countries. Conclusion: Understanding the factors influencing the uptake of outcome measures among neurological physical therapists working in a developed (Canada) and a developing country (India) can help identify whether strategies should or should not be modified to facilitate knowledge translation in different geographical, professional, or social contexts.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere1756
JournalPhysiotherapy Research International
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01-01-2019

Fingerprint

Developed Countries
Developing Countries
Physical Therapists
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Canada
India
Translational Medical Research
Practice Guidelines
Reproducibility of Results
Surveys and Questionnaires

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

Demers, Marika ; Blanchette, Andréanne K. ; Mullick, Aditi A. ; Shah, Akash ; Woo, Kathleen ; Solomon, John ; Levin, Mindy F. / Facilitators and barriers to using neurological outcome measures in developed and developing countries. In: Physiotherapy Research International. 2019.
@article{b267793d85d64ae5808f24d671b71f03,
title = "Facilitators and barriers to using neurological outcome measures in developed and developing countries",
abstract = "Objective: To identify and compare factors influencing the use of standardized outcome measures by neurological physical therapists working in representative developed (Canada) and developing (India) countries. Methods: A self-administered web-based questionnaire on facilitators and barriers to using neurological outcome measures was sent by email to neurological physical therapists in Canada and India. Frequencies of responses to each question were computed. Differences between countries were assessed using two-proportion z test. Results: Of 317 respondents, the use of standardized outcome measures was higher for Indian (96.7{\%}) compared with Canadian physical therapists (89.2{\%}). Among the most highly reported facilitators, three were common for both countries (known validity and reliability, outcome measures learned in professional training, and recommended in clinical practice guidelines). Three highly reported barriers were also common for India and Canada (lack of time, relying on judgement for clinical decisions, and unavailability of the assessment tools). Nevertheless, there were differences in the percentages of barriers and facilitators between countries. Conclusion: Understanding the factors influencing the uptake of outcome measures among neurological physical therapists working in a developed (Canada) and a developing country (India) can help identify whether strategies should or should not be modified to facilitate knowledge translation in different geographical, professional, or social contexts.",
author = "Marika Demers and Blanchette, {Andr{\'e}anne K.} and Mullick, {Aditi A.} and Akash Shah and Kathleen Woo and John Solomon and Levin, {Mindy F.}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/pri.1756",
language = "English",
journal = "Physiotherapy Research International",
issn = "1358-2267",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",

}

Facilitators and barriers to using neurological outcome measures in developed and developing countries. / Demers, Marika; Blanchette, Andréanne K.; Mullick, Aditi A.; Shah, Akash; Woo, Kathleen; Solomon, John; Levin, Mindy F.

In: Physiotherapy Research International, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Facilitators and barriers to using neurological outcome measures in developed and developing countries

AU - Demers, Marika

AU - Blanchette, Andréanne K.

AU - Mullick, Aditi A.

AU - Shah, Akash

AU - Woo, Kathleen

AU - Solomon, John

AU - Levin, Mindy F.

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Objective: To identify and compare factors influencing the use of standardized outcome measures by neurological physical therapists working in representative developed (Canada) and developing (India) countries. Methods: A self-administered web-based questionnaire on facilitators and barriers to using neurological outcome measures was sent by email to neurological physical therapists in Canada and India. Frequencies of responses to each question were computed. Differences between countries were assessed using two-proportion z test. Results: Of 317 respondents, the use of standardized outcome measures was higher for Indian (96.7%) compared with Canadian physical therapists (89.2%). Among the most highly reported facilitators, three were common for both countries (known validity and reliability, outcome measures learned in professional training, and recommended in clinical practice guidelines). Three highly reported barriers were also common for India and Canada (lack of time, relying on judgement for clinical decisions, and unavailability of the assessment tools). Nevertheless, there were differences in the percentages of barriers and facilitators between countries. Conclusion: Understanding the factors influencing the uptake of outcome measures among neurological physical therapists working in a developed (Canada) and a developing country (India) can help identify whether strategies should or should not be modified to facilitate knowledge translation in different geographical, professional, or social contexts.

AB - Objective: To identify and compare factors influencing the use of standardized outcome measures by neurological physical therapists working in representative developed (Canada) and developing (India) countries. Methods: A self-administered web-based questionnaire on facilitators and barriers to using neurological outcome measures was sent by email to neurological physical therapists in Canada and India. Frequencies of responses to each question were computed. Differences between countries were assessed using two-proportion z test. Results: Of 317 respondents, the use of standardized outcome measures was higher for Indian (96.7%) compared with Canadian physical therapists (89.2%). Among the most highly reported facilitators, three were common for both countries (known validity and reliability, outcome measures learned in professional training, and recommended in clinical practice guidelines). Three highly reported barriers were also common for India and Canada (lack of time, relying on judgement for clinical decisions, and unavailability of the assessment tools). Nevertheless, there were differences in the percentages of barriers and facilitators between countries. Conclusion: Understanding the factors influencing the uptake of outcome measures among neurological physical therapists working in a developed (Canada) and a developing country (India) can help identify whether strategies should or should not be modified to facilitate knowledge translation in different geographical, professional, or social contexts.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85056152094&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85056152094&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/pri.1756

DO - 10.1002/pri.1756

M3 - Article

C2 - 30403320

AN - SCOPUS:85056152094

JO - Physiotherapy Research International

JF - Physiotherapy Research International

SN - 1358-2267

M1 - e1756

ER -