Factor structure of the Mental Health Professionals Stress Scale (MHPSS) among clinical psychologists in India

S. Mehrotra, K. Rao, D. K. Subbakrishna

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study examined the factor structure of the Mental Health Professionals Stress Scale (MHPSS) and its reliability and validity in a sample of 116 clinical psychologists in India. Principal component analysis of the MHPSS identified four factors that accounted for 42.2% of the total variance. These 4 factors reflected 6 of the 7 original subscales. The subscale 'Client-related difficulties' did not emerge as a distinct factor. The authors attribute this to cultural differences in the therapist-patient relationship. The MHPSS correlated negatively with measures of professional role satisfaction and subjective well being. It was concluded that the MHPSS is a reliable and valid tool to measure sources of occupational stress experienced by mental health professionals.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)142-150
Number of pages9
JournalInternational Journal of Social Psychiatry
Volume46
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01-01-2000
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

India
Mental Health
Psychology
Professional Role
Principal Component Analysis
Reproducibility of Results

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

@article{854d5545b67f4a108badf46c90e78cf9,
title = "Factor structure of the Mental Health Professionals Stress Scale (MHPSS) among clinical psychologists in India",
abstract = "This study examined the factor structure of the Mental Health Professionals Stress Scale (MHPSS) and its reliability and validity in a sample of 116 clinical psychologists in India. Principal component analysis of the MHPSS identified four factors that accounted for 42.2{\%} of the total variance. These 4 factors reflected 6 of the 7 original subscales. The subscale 'Client-related difficulties' did not emerge as a distinct factor. The authors attribute this to cultural differences in the therapist-patient relationship. The MHPSS correlated negatively with measures of professional role satisfaction and subjective well being. It was concluded that the MHPSS is a reliable and valid tool to measure sources of occupational stress experienced by mental health professionals.",
author = "S. Mehrotra and K. Rao and Subbakrishna, {D. K.}",
year = "2000",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/002076400004600207",
language = "English",
volume = "46",
pages = "142--150",
journal = "International Journal of Social Psychiatry",
issn = "0020-7640",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "2",

}

Factor structure of the Mental Health Professionals Stress Scale (MHPSS) among clinical psychologists in India. / Mehrotra, S.; Rao, K.; Subbakrishna, D. K.

In: International Journal of Social Psychiatry, Vol. 46, No. 2, 01.01.2000, p. 142-150.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Factor structure of the Mental Health Professionals Stress Scale (MHPSS) among clinical psychologists in India

AU - Mehrotra, S.

AU - Rao, K.

AU - Subbakrishna, D. K.

PY - 2000/1/1

Y1 - 2000/1/1

N2 - This study examined the factor structure of the Mental Health Professionals Stress Scale (MHPSS) and its reliability and validity in a sample of 116 clinical psychologists in India. Principal component analysis of the MHPSS identified four factors that accounted for 42.2% of the total variance. These 4 factors reflected 6 of the 7 original subscales. The subscale 'Client-related difficulties' did not emerge as a distinct factor. The authors attribute this to cultural differences in the therapist-patient relationship. The MHPSS correlated negatively with measures of professional role satisfaction and subjective well being. It was concluded that the MHPSS is a reliable and valid tool to measure sources of occupational stress experienced by mental health professionals.

AB - This study examined the factor structure of the Mental Health Professionals Stress Scale (MHPSS) and its reliability and validity in a sample of 116 clinical psychologists in India. Principal component analysis of the MHPSS identified four factors that accounted for 42.2% of the total variance. These 4 factors reflected 6 of the 7 original subscales. The subscale 'Client-related difficulties' did not emerge as a distinct factor. The authors attribute this to cultural differences in the therapist-patient relationship. The MHPSS correlated negatively with measures of professional role satisfaction and subjective well being. It was concluded that the MHPSS is a reliable and valid tool to measure sources of occupational stress experienced by mental health professionals.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033885958&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033885958&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/002076400004600207

DO - 10.1177/002076400004600207

M3 - Article

C2 - 10950362

AN - SCOPUS:0033885958

VL - 46

SP - 142

EP - 150

JO - International Journal of Social Psychiatry

JF - International Journal of Social Psychiatry

SN - 0020-7640

IS - 2

ER -