Forehead against Resistance (FAR)

Preliminary findings from a clinical alternative to Shaker’s type of exercise

Radish Kumar Balasubramaniam, Rahul Krishnamurthy, Athira Rajan, K. Suprasanna

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background. Reduced UES opening is a well-known risk factor for dysphagia. The Shaker exercise and the CTAR are the widely used intervention strategies to bring about effective UES opening. But there are well-known difficulties with the clinical use of these two exercise regimes. The present study proposes a clinical alternative to Shaker’s exercise and CTAR called the forehead against resistance (FAR) and its variants without altering the central principles of these two regimes. The aim of the present study was to investigate the efficacy of FAR and its variants in bringing about UES opening. Method. The study used a comparative cross-sectional study design, with the nonrandomized convenient sampling that included 27 healthy adults. MBS was carried out in the anterior-posterior and lateral views, while the participants performed FAR and its variants. The UES diameter was measured in the baseline and with the subjects performing FAR maneuver and its variants. Results. The result revealed that the participants had greater UES opening on FAR and its variant than the baseline swallow. Also, mean values of UES opening were greater for FAR with chin tuck when compared to FAR alone, although there was no significant main effect with exercise. Conclusion. FAR and its variant could be one of the options for increasing UES opening in individuals with dysphagia.

Original languageEnglish
Article number9387578
JournalGastroenterology Research and Practice
Volume2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01-01-2019

Fingerprint

Forehead
Exercise
Deglutition Disorders
Chin
Deglutition
Cross-Sectional Studies

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Hepatology
  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

@article{8d3080a37bd84a96b478c3f7ad7cd19f,
title = "Forehead against Resistance (FAR): Preliminary findings from a clinical alternative to Shaker’s type of exercise",
abstract = "Background. Reduced UES opening is a well-known risk factor for dysphagia. The Shaker exercise and the CTAR are the widely used intervention strategies to bring about effective UES opening. But there are well-known difficulties with the clinical use of these two exercise regimes. The present study proposes a clinical alternative to Shaker’s exercise and CTAR called the forehead against resistance (FAR) and its variants without altering the central principles of these two regimes. The aim of the present study was to investigate the efficacy of FAR and its variants in bringing about UES opening. Method. The study used a comparative cross-sectional study design, with the nonrandomized convenient sampling that included 27 healthy adults. MBS was carried out in the anterior-posterior and lateral views, while the participants performed FAR and its variants. The UES diameter was measured in the baseline and with the subjects performing FAR maneuver and its variants. Results. The result revealed that the participants had greater UES opening on FAR and its variant than the baseline swallow. Also, mean values of UES opening were greater for FAR with chin tuck when compared to FAR alone, although there was no significant main effect with exercise. Conclusion. FAR and its variant could be one of the options for increasing UES opening in individuals with dysphagia.",
author = "Balasubramaniam, {Radish Kumar} and Rahul Krishnamurthy and Athira Rajan and K. Suprasanna",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1155/2019/9387578",
language = "English",
volume = "2019",
journal = "Gastroenterology Research and Practice",
issn = "1687-6121",
publisher = "Hindawi Publishing Corporation",

}

Forehead against Resistance (FAR) : Preliminary findings from a clinical alternative to Shaker’s type of exercise. / Balasubramaniam, Radish Kumar; Krishnamurthy, Rahul; Rajan, Athira; Suprasanna, K.

In: Gastroenterology Research and Practice, Vol. 2019, 9387578, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Forehead against Resistance (FAR)

T2 - Preliminary findings from a clinical alternative to Shaker’s type of exercise

AU - Balasubramaniam, Radish Kumar

AU - Krishnamurthy, Rahul

AU - Rajan, Athira

AU - Suprasanna, K.

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Background. Reduced UES opening is a well-known risk factor for dysphagia. The Shaker exercise and the CTAR are the widely used intervention strategies to bring about effective UES opening. But there are well-known difficulties with the clinical use of these two exercise regimes. The present study proposes a clinical alternative to Shaker’s exercise and CTAR called the forehead against resistance (FAR) and its variants without altering the central principles of these two regimes. The aim of the present study was to investigate the efficacy of FAR and its variants in bringing about UES opening. Method. The study used a comparative cross-sectional study design, with the nonrandomized convenient sampling that included 27 healthy adults. MBS was carried out in the anterior-posterior and lateral views, while the participants performed FAR and its variants. The UES diameter was measured in the baseline and with the subjects performing FAR maneuver and its variants. Results. The result revealed that the participants had greater UES opening on FAR and its variant than the baseline swallow. Also, mean values of UES opening were greater for FAR with chin tuck when compared to FAR alone, although there was no significant main effect with exercise. Conclusion. FAR and its variant could be one of the options for increasing UES opening in individuals with dysphagia.

AB - Background. Reduced UES opening is a well-known risk factor for dysphagia. The Shaker exercise and the CTAR are the widely used intervention strategies to bring about effective UES opening. But there are well-known difficulties with the clinical use of these two exercise regimes. The present study proposes a clinical alternative to Shaker’s exercise and CTAR called the forehead against resistance (FAR) and its variants without altering the central principles of these two regimes. The aim of the present study was to investigate the efficacy of FAR and its variants in bringing about UES opening. Method. The study used a comparative cross-sectional study design, with the nonrandomized convenient sampling that included 27 healthy adults. MBS was carried out in the anterior-posterior and lateral views, while the participants performed FAR and its variants. The UES diameter was measured in the baseline and with the subjects performing FAR maneuver and its variants. Results. The result revealed that the participants had greater UES opening on FAR and its variant than the baseline swallow. Also, mean values of UES opening were greater for FAR with chin tuck when compared to FAR alone, although there was no significant main effect with exercise. Conclusion. FAR and its variant could be one of the options for increasing UES opening in individuals with dysphagia.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065798692&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85065798692&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1155/2019/9387578

DO - 10.1155/2019/9387578

M3 - Article

VL - 2019

JO - Gastroenterology Research and Practice

JF - Gastroenterology Research and Practice

SN - 1687-6121

M1 - 9387578

ER -