Gender disparity in Indian renal transplantation

Radha Malattiri, Nandini K. Kumar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Gender disparities are a major ethical concern in renal donation and transplantation. Relatively few Indian studies, each limited by small sample sizes, have investigated the problem of gender disparities in renal transplantation. Methods: A retrospective, cross-sectional study was conducted using data collected from kidney transplantation centers in Kerala, a southern state of India, to analyze the gender disparity in kidney donation and transplantation. Data were collected on gender, age, and relationship of the donor to the recipient. Results: Among 592 related cases, 74.2% of donors were female and 25.8% male (p <.0001). In the case of recipients, 76.2% were male and 23.8% female (p <.0001). Among 110 unrelated donors, 30.9% were female and 69.1% male (p <.0001), while the recipients were 78.2% male and 21.8% female (p <.0001). The number of cadaver kidney transplantations (six) was too small for analysis. Conclusion: The study found that the majority of living-related donors are family members (first-degree relatives) of the affected patients, with a definite female gender disparity among donors and recipients, more pronounced than reported in other studies. This disparity was absent in the case of living-unrelated donors, however. Existing practices in the organ transplantation process should be reviewed in order to eliminate the donor gender disparity in India. Kidney transplantation registries and organ matching systems at the national, state, and district levels are necessary for accountability and regulation of the transplantation process in India.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-7
Number of pages7
JournalAJOB Empirical Bioethics
Volume5
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01-01-2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Kidney Transplantation
gender
recipient
Tissue Donors
India
Unrelated Donors
Living Donors
donation
Social Responsibility
Organ Transplantation
Cadaver
cross-sectional study
Sample Size
family member
Registries
Transplantation
Cross-Sectional Studies
district
regulation
responsibility

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Health(social science)
  • Philosophy
  • Health Policy

Cite this

Malattiri, Radha ; Kumar, Nandini K. / Gender disparity in Indian renal transplantation. In: AJOB Empirical Bioethics. 2014 ; Vol. 5, No. 3. pp. 1-7.
@article{e7a225a2befd48c2be8addd1fb058748,
title = "Gender disparity in Indian renal transplantation",
abstract = "Gender disparities are a major ethical concern in renal donation and transplantation. Relatively few Indian studies, each limited by small sample sizes, have investigated the problem of gender disparities in renal transplantation. Methods: A retrospective, cross-sectional study was conducted using data collected from kidney transplantation centers in Kerala, a southern state of India, to analyze the gender disparity in kidney donation and transplantation. Data were collected on gender, age, and relationship of the donor to the recipient. Results: Among 592 related cases, 74.2{\%} of donors were female and 25.8{\%} male (p <.0001). In the case of recipients, 76.2{\%} were male and 23.8{\%} female (p <.0001). Among 110 unrelated donors, 30.9{\%} were female and 69.1{\%} male (p <.0001), while the recipients were 78.2{\%} male and 21.8{\%} female (p <.0001). The number of cadaver kidney transplantations (six) was too small for analysis. Conclusion: The study found that the majority of living-related donors are family members (first-degree relatives) of the affected patients, with a definite female gender disparity among donors and recipients, more pronounced than reported in other studies. This disparity was absent in the case of living-unrelated donors, however. Existing practices in the organ transplantation process should be reviewed in order to eliminate the donor gender disparity in India. Kidney transplantation registries and organ matching systems at the national, state, and district levels are necessary for accountability and regulation of the transplantation process in India.",
author = "Radha Malattiri and Kumar, {Nandini K.}",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/23294515.2014.892909",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
pages = "1--7",
journal = "AJOB Empirical Bioethics",
issn = "2329-4515",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "3",

}

Gender disparity in Indian renal transplantation. / Malattiri, Radha; Kumar, Nandini K.

In: AJOB Empirical Bioethics, Vol. 5, No. 3, 01.01.2014, p. 1-7.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Gender disparity in Indian renal transplantation

AU - Malattiri, Radha

AU - Kumar, Nandini K.

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - Gender disparities are a major ethical concern in renal donation and transplantation. Relatively few Indian studies, each limited by small sample sizes, have investigated the problem of gender disparities in renal transplantation. Methods: A retrospective, cross-sectional study was conducted using data collected from kidney transplantation centers in Kerala, a southern state of India, to analyze the gender disparity in kidney donation and transplantation. Data were collected on gender, age, and relationship of the donor to the recipient. Results: Among 592 related cases, 74.2% of donors were female and 25.8% male (p <.0001). In the case of recipients, 76.2% were male and 23.8% female (p <.0001). Among 110 unrelated donors, 30.9% were female and 69.1% male (p <.0001), while the recipients were 78.2% male and 21.8% female (p <.0001). The number of cadaver kidney transplantations (six) was too small for analysis. Conclusion: The study found that the majority of living-related donors are family members (first-degree relatives) of the affected patients, with a definite female gender disparity among donors and recipients, more pronounced than reported in other studies. This disparity was absent in the case of living-unrelated donors, however. Existing practices in the organ transplantation process should be reviewed in order to eliminate the donor gender disparity in India. Kidney transplantation registries and organ matching systems at the national, state, and district levels are necessary for accountability and regulation of the transplantation process in India.

AB - Gender disparities are a major ethical concern in renal donation and transplantation. Relatively few Indian studies, each limited by small sample sizes, have investigated the problem of gender disparities in renal transplantation. Methods: A retrospective, cross-sectional study was conducted using data collected from kidney transplantation centers in Kerala, a southern state of India, to analyze the gender disparity in kidney donation and transplantation. Data were collected on gender, age, and relationship of the donor to the recipient. Results: Among 592 related cases, 74.2% of donors were female and 25.8% male (p <.0001). In the case of recipients, 76.2% were male and 23.8% female (p <.0001). Among 110 unrelated donors, 30.9% were female and 69.1% male (p <.0001), while the recipients were 78.2% male and 21.8% female (p <.0001). The number of cadaver kidney transplantations (six) was too small for analysis. Conclusion: The study found that the majority of living-related donors are family members (first-degree relatives) of the affected patients, with a definite female gender disparity among donors and recipients, more pronounced than reported in other studies. This disparity was absent in the case of living-unrelated donors, however. Existing practices in the organ transplantation process should be reviewed in order to eliminate the donor gender disparity in India. Kidney transplantation registries and organ matching systems at the national, state, and district levels are necessary for accountability and regulation of the transplantation process in India.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84904464870&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84904464870&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/23294515.2014.892909

DO - 10.1080/23294515.2014.892909

M3 - Article

VL - 5

SP - 1

EP - 7

JO - AJOB Empirical Bioethics

JF - AJOB Empirical Bioethics

SN - 2329-4515

IS - 3

ER -