Gender-specific 11-dehydro-thromboxane B2 levels in acute coronary syndrome and its association with clinical outcomes

Sheetal Chauhan, Ajit Singh, Yeshwanth Rao Karkala, Tom Devasia, Hashir Kareem, Deepak Uppunda, Prasad Narayana Shetty, Ganesh Paramasivam

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Despite knowing that females are at a higher risk of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and poor prognosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA), there are very few studies focusing on urinary 11-dehyrdothromboxane B2 (dh-TxB2) concentration (for aspirin non-responsiveness) differences among males and females. The present prospective observational study aimed to evaluate the dh-TxB2 levels and associate them with clinical outcomes in males and females with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) after PTCA. The dh-TxB2 ELISA assay was carried out twice, at baseline and 6 months follow-up, and outcomes were assessed for 1 year. The average cut-off value of dh-TxB2 was ≥1,496 pg/mg creatinine by the receiver operating characteristic curve estimation. A total of 192 patients (140 men and 52 women) were enrolled. At baseline, 17 (12.1%) males and 7 (13.5%) females had high dh-TxB2 levels, whereas at 6 months, 22 (15.9%) males and 4 (7.8%) females showed high dh-TxB2 levels. The concentration of dh-TxB2 was higher in females than males at baseline. Composite MACE was not different between genders significantly even when the dh-TxB2 levels were high. Women experienced higher MACE incidences than men (13.5%vs. 9.3%).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)10-17
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Applied Pharmaceutical Science
Volume10
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 11-2020

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics(all)
  • Pharmacology (medical)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Gender-specific 11-dehydro-thromboxane B2 levels in acute coronary syndrome and its association with clinical outcomes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this