Genital ulcer disease in India

Etiologies and performance of current syndrome guidelines

Parimi Prabhakar, Prakash Narayanan, Gururaj Rao Deshpande, Anjana Das, Graham Neilsen, Sanjay Mehendale, Arun Risbud

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In India, genital ulcer disease (GUD) syndrome is clinically classified as herpetic or nonherpetic and managed accordingly; laboratory support is unavailable at most health facilities. We undertook a study to determine the etiology of GUDs in men presenting to sexually transmitted infection (STI) clinics and assess the performance of the national algorithm for syndromic management of herpetic and nonherpetic GUDs in India. METHOD: A cross-sectional study was conducted among men with complaints of genital ulcers attending 8 STI clinics in 4 states. Ulcer swabs were collected and tested by the multiplex polymerase chain reaction method to determine the etiology of GUD. RESULTS: Of the 194 men recruited, etiology was confirmed in 121 GUD cases (62%). Herpes simplex virus (48%) was the most common etiological agent identified, followed by Treponema pallidum (23%) and mixed infections (9%). One case of Haemophilus ducreyi was confirmed in this series. The overall sensitivity and specificity of the national syndromic management algorithm for GUD were 68% and 52%, respectively. Using the national algorithm, 52 (42%) cases clinically misclassified as either herpetic (18 cases) or nonherpetic (34 cases) GUD resulting in incorrect treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest a revision of existing national STI treatment guidelines in India to include treatment of syphilis infections of all GUD patients. Periodic studies are required to monitor changing spectrum of GUD etiologies in India.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)906-910
Number of pages5
JournalSexually Transmitted Diseases
Volume39
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01-11-2012

Fingerprint

Ulcer
India
Guidelines
Sexually Transmitted Diseases
Haemophilus ducreyi
Treponema pallidum
Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction
Health Facilities
Simplexvirus
Syphilis
Coinfection
Therapeutics
Cross-Sectional Studies
Sensitivity and Specificity
Infection

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Dermatology
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Microbiology (medical)
  • Infectious Diseases

Cite this

Prabhakar, Parimi ; Narayanan, Prakash ; Deshpande, Gururaj Rao ; Das, Anjana ; Neilsen, Graham ; Mehendale, Sanjay ; Risbud, Arun. / Genital ulcer disease in India : Etiologies and performance of current syndrome guidelines. In: Sexually Transmitted Diseases. 2012 ; Vol. 39, No. 11. pp. 906-910.
@article{b29d99ba909c4826bcc48ebd95f122c9,
title = "Genital ulcer disease in India: Etiologies and performance of current syndrome guidelines",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: In India, genital ulcer disease (GUD) syndrome is clinically classified as herpetic or nonherpetic and managed accordingly; laboratory support is unavailable at most health facilities. We undertook a study to determine the etiology of GUDs in men presenting to sexually transmitted infection (STI) clinics and assess the performance of the national algorithm for syndromic management of herpetic and nonherpetic GUDs in India. METHOD: A cross-sectional study was conducted among men with complaints of genital ulcers attending 8 STI clinics in 4 states. Ulcer swabs were collected and tested by the multiplex polymerase chain reaction method to determine the etiology of GUD. RESULTS: Of the 194 men recruited, etiology was confirmed in 121 GUD cases (62{\%}). Herpes simplex virus (48{\%}) was the most common etiological agent identified, followed by Treponema pallidum (23{\%}) and mixed infections (9{\%}). One case of Haemophilus ducreyi was confirmed in this series. The overall sensitivity and specificity of the national syndromic management algorithm for GUD were 68{\%} and 52{\%}, respectively. Using the national algorithm, 52 (42{\%}) cases clinically misclassified as either herpetic (18 cases) or nonherpetic (34 cases) GUD resulting in incorrect treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest a revision of existing national STI treatment guidelines in India to include treatment of syphilis infections of all GUD patients. Periodic studies are required to monitor changing spectrum of GUD etiologies in India.",
author = "Parimi Prabhakar and Prakash Narayanan and Deshpande, {Gururaj Rao} and Anjana Das and Graham Neilsen and Sanjay Mehendale and Arun Risbud",
year = "2012",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/OLQ.0b013e3182663e22",
language = "English",
volume = "39",
pages = "906--910",
journal = "Sexually Transmitted Diseases",
issn = "0148-5717",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "11",

}

Genital ulcer disease in India : Etiologies and performance of current syndrome guidelines. / Prabhakar, Parimi; Narayanan, Prakash; Deshpande, Gururaj Rao; Das, Anjana; Neilsen, Graham; Mehendale, Sanjay; Risbud, Arun.

In: Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Vol. 39, No. 11, 01.11.2012, p. 906-910.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Genital ulcer disease in India

T2 - Etiologies and performance of current syndrome guidelines

AU - Prabhakar, Parimi

AU - Narayanan, Prakash

AU - Deshpande, Gururaj Rao

AU - Das, Anjana

AU - Neilsen, Graham

AU - Mehendale, Sanjay

AU - Risbud, Arun

PY - 2012/11/1

Y1 - 2012/11/1

N2 - BACKGROUND: In India, genital ulcer disease (GUD) syndrome is clinically classified as herpetic or nonherpetic and managed accordingly; laboratory support is unavailable at most health facilities. We undertook a study to determine the etiology of GUDs in men presenting to sexually transmitted infection (STI) clinics and assess the performance of the national algorithm for syndromic management of herpetic and nonherpetic GUDs in India. METHOD: A cross-sectional study was conducted among men with complaints of genital ulcers attending 8 STI clinics in 4 states. Ulcer swabs were collected and tested by the multiplex polymerase chain reaction method to determine the etiology of GUD. RESULTS: Of the 194 men recruited, etiology was confirmed in 121 GUD cases (62%). Herpes simplex virus (48%) was the most common etiological agent identified, followed by Treponema pallidum (23%) and mixed infections (9%). One case of Haemophilus ducreyi was confirmed in this series. The overall sensitivity and specificity of the national syndromic management algorithm for GUD were 68% and 52%, respectively. Using the national algorithm, 52 (42%) cases clinically misclassified as either herpetic (18 cases) or nonherpetic (34 cases) GUD resulting in incorrect treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest a revision of existing national STI treatment guidelines in India to include treatment of syphilis infections of all GUD patients. Periodic studies are required to monitor changing spectrum of GUD etiologies in India.

AB - BACKGROUND: In India, genital ulcer disease (GUD) syndrome is clinically classified as herpetic or nonherpetic and managed accordingly; laboratory support is unavailable at most health facilities. We undertook a study to determine the etiology of GUDs in men presenting to sexually transmitted infection (STI) clinics and assess the performance of the national algorithm for syndromic management of herpetic and nonherpetic GUDs in India. METHOD: A cross-sectional study was conducted among men with complaints of genital ulcers attending 8 STI clinics in 4 states. Ulcer swabs were collected and tested by the multiplex polymerase chain reaction method to determine the etiology of GUD. RESULTS: Of the 194 men recruited, etiology was confirmed in 121 GUD cases (62%). Herpes simplex virus (48%) was the most common etiological agent identified, followed by Treponema pallidum (23%) and mixed infections (9%). One case of Haemophilus ducreyi was confirmed in this series. The overall sensitivity and specificity of the national syndromic management algorithm for GUD were 68% and 52%, respectively. Using the national algorithm, 52 (42%) cases clinically misclassified as either herpetic (18 cases) or nonherpetic (34 cases) GUD resulting in incorrect treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest a revision of existing national STI treatment guidelines in India to include treatment of syphilis infections of all GUD patients. Periodic studies are required to monitor changing spectrum of GUD etiologies in India.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84867746463&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84867746463&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e3182663e22

DO - 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e3182663e22

M3 - Article

VL - 39

SP - 906

EP - 910

JO - Sexually Transmitted Diseases

JF - Sexually Transmitted Diseases

SN - 0148-5717

IS - 11

ER -