IC disclosure practices in India using a comprehensive disclosure framework: A study of knowledge-based companies

Santi Gopal Maji, Mitra Goswami

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: This paper aims to address the need to modify the existing intellectual capital (IC) disclosure frameworks and examines the disclosure practices of Indian knowledge-based companies by using a comprehensive IC disclosure index that has been developed in this study. Design/methodology/approach: The annual reports of 30 listed knowledge-intensive companies from two sectors – pharmaceutical sector and engineering sector – have been analysed for a period of five years from 2010-2011 to 2014-2015. Additionally, the sample firms were ranked on the basis of market capitalisation (MC) to examine the IC reporting practice of firms with high and low MC. An IC disclosure index has been developed through comparative analysis of the frameworks used in three studies that is based on Bukh et al.’s (2001) classification. Further, the study has also considered intangibles and the related non-financial indicators of MERITUM guidelines. The disclosure index consists of a total of 69 items encompassing six components. Findings: The overall IC disclosure trend showed an increase in reporting practice over the five-year study period. With respect to the components, process capital is found to be the most disclosed component while relational capital is the least disclosed component. After categorisation of firms into high and low MC, it has been observed that the IC disclosure scores of firms with high MC are significantly higher than firms with low MC. Practical implications: This paper has developed an IC disclosure index through careful analysis and scrutiny of the existing frameworks which contributes to the existing literature. Likewise, the use of a comprehensive framework can aid the investors to know the true value of the firm and make proper market decisions. Originality/value: This is the first paper in the Indian context in which a modified IC disclosure index is framed based on Bukh et al. (2001) framework for examining IC reporting practices.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)345-363
Number of pages19
JournalJournal of Indian Business Research
Volume10
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 19-11-2018
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Knowledge-based
Intellectual capital
Disclosure
India
Market capitalization
Disclosure index
Investors
Annual reports
Relational capital
Pharmaceuticals
Encompassing
Comparative analysis
Design methodology
Intangibles

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Business, Management and Accounting(all)

Cite this

@article{68dd70be3e8c416f945587925332abef,
title = "IC disclosure practices in India using a comprehensive disclosure framework: A study of knowledge-based companies",
abstract = "Purpose: This paper aims to address the need to modify the existing intellectual capital (IC) disclosure frameworks and examines the disclosure practices of Indian knowledge-based companies by using a comprehensive IC disclosure index that has been developed in this study. Design/methodology/approach: The annual reports of 30 listed knowledge-intensive companies from two sectors – pharmaceutical sector and engineering sector – have been analysed for a period of five years from 2010-2011 to 2014-2015. Additionally, the sample firms were ranked on the basis of market capitalisation (MC) to examine the IC reporting practice of firms with high and low MC. An IC disclosure index has been developed through comparative analysis of the frameworks used in three studies that is based on Bukh et al.’s (2001) classification. Further, the study has also considered intangibles and the related non-financial indicators of MERITUM guidelines. The disclosure index consists of a total of 69 items encompassing six components. Findings: The overall IC disclosure trend showed an increase in reporting practice over the five-year study period. With respect to the components, process capital is found to be the most disclosed component while relational capital is the least disclosed component. After categorisation of firms into high and low MC, it has been observed that the IC disclosure scores of firms with high MC are significantly higher than firms with low MC. Practical implications: This paper has developed an IC disclosure index through careful analysis and scrutiny of the existing frameworks which contributes to the existing literature. Likewise, the use of a comprehensive framework can aid the investors to know the true value of the firm and make proper market decisions. Originality/value: This is the first paper in the Indian context in which a modified IC disclosure index is framed based on Bukh et al. (2001) framework for examining IC reporting practices.",
author = "Maji, {Santi Gopal} and Mitra Goswami",
year = "2018",
month = "11",
day = "19",
doi = "10.1108/JIBR-01-2017-0011",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "345--363",
journal = "Journal of Indian Business Research",
issn = "1755-4195",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "4",

}

IC disclosure practices in India using a comprehensive disclosure framework : A study of knowledge-based companies. / Maji, Santi Gopal; Goswami, Mitra.

In: Journal of Indian Business Research, Vol. 10, No. 4, 19.11.2018, p. 345-363.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - IC disclosure practices in India using a comprehensive disclosure framework

T2 - A study of knowledge-based companies

AU - Maji, Santi Gopal

AU - Goswami, Mitra

PY - 2018/11/19

Y1 - 2018/11/19

N2 - Purpose: This paper aims to address the need to modify the existing intellectual capital (IC) disclosure frameworks and examines the disclosure practices of Indian knowledge-based companies by using a comprehensive IC disclosure index that has been developed in this study. Design/methodology/approach: The annual reports of 30 listed knowledge-intensive companies from two sectors – pharmaceutical sector and engineering sector – have been analysed for a period of five years from 2010-2011 to 2014-2015. Additionally, the sample firms were ranked on the basis of market capitalisation (MC) to examine the IC reporting practice of firms with high and low MC. An IC disclosure index has been developed through comparative analysis of the frameworks used in three studies that is based on Bukh et al.’s (2001) classification. Further, the study has also considered intangibles and the related non-financial indicators of MERITUM guidelines. The disclosure index consists of a total of 69 items encompassing six components. Findings: The overall IC disclosure trend showed an increase in reporting practice over the five-year study period. With respect to the components, process capital is found to be the most disclosed component while relational capital is the least disclosed component. After categorisation of firms into high and low MC, it has been observed that the IC disclosure scores of firms with high MC are significantly higher than firms with low MC. Practical implications: This paper has developed an IC disclosure index through careful analysis and scrutiny of the existing frameworks which contributes to the existing literature. Likewise, the use of a comprehensive framework can aid the investors to know the true value of the firm and make proper market decisions. Originality/value: This is the first paper in the Indian context in which a modified IC disclosure index is framed based on Bukh et al. (2001) framework for examining IC reporting practices.

AB - Purpose: This paper aims to address the need to modify the existing intellectual capital (IC) disclosure frameworks and examines the disclosure practices of Indian knowledge-based companies by using a comprehensive IC disclosure index that has been developed in this study. Design/methodology/approach: The annual reports of 30 listed knowledge-intensive companies from two sectors – pharmaceutical sector and engineering sector – have been analysed for a period of five years from 2010-2011 to 2014-2015. Additionally, the sample firms were ranked on the basis of market capitalisation (MC) to examine the IC reporting practice of firms with high and low MC. An IC disclosure index has been developed through comparative analysis of the frameworks used in three studies that is based on Bukh et al.’s (2001) classification. Further, the study has also considered intangibles and the related non-financial indicators of MERITUM guidelines. The disclosure index consists of a total of 69 items encompassing six components. Findings: The overall IC disclosure trend showed an increase in reporting practice over the five-year study period. With respect to the components, process capital is found to be the most disclosed component while relational capital is the least disclosed component. After categorisation of firms into high and low MC, it has been observed that the IC disclosure scores of firms with high MC are significantly higher than firms with low MC. Practical implications: This paper has developed an IC disclosure index through careful analysis and scrutiny of the existing frameworks which contributes to the existing literature. Likewise, the use of a comprehensive framework can aid the investors to know the true value of the firm and make proper market decisions. Originality/value: This is the first paper in the Indian context in which a modified IC disclosure index is framed based on Bukh et al. (2001) framework for examining IC reporting practices.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85054621410&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85054621410&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/JIBR-01-2017-0011

DO - 10.1108/JIBR-01-2017-0011

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85054621410

VL - 10

SP - 345

EP - 363

JO - Journal of Indian Business Research

JF - Journal of Indian Business Research

SN - 1755-4195

IS - 4

ER -