Illness cognitions, anxiety, and depression in men and women undergoing fertility treatments

A dyadic approach

Ansha Patel, P. S.V.N. Sharma, Pratap Kumar, V. S. Binu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Emotional response to infertility is mediated by numerous interrelated psychological variables such as personality, health perceptions, cognitive appraisals, coping, and social support. While men and women respond to infertility differently, illness cognitions are a vital component of their emotional adjustment. The aim of this study is to compare the infertile men and women undergoing fertility treatments on perceived distress, helplessness, acceptance, benefits, anxiety, and depression. Materials and Methods: Eighty-one infertile couples, undergoing intrauterine insemination participated in the study. They were assessed on the presence of infertility distress using the fertility problem inventory, for psychiatric morbidity using the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview, for affective disturbances using the Hamilton Anxiety and Depression scales, and for illness cognitions using the Illness Cognition Questionnaire. Statistical Analysis: Data are analyzed using SPSS version 15. The paired sample t-test is performed for assessing differences on normally distributed data. The Wilcoxon Signed-Rank test is performed for assessing differences in medians obtained on data that was skewed. Results and Discussion: Infertile women (wives) were more emotionally distressed, anxious, and depressed than men (husbands). Gender-wise differences were found for perceptions of helplessness and acceptance of infertility. Infertility was perceived to be a nonbeneficial event for both partners investigated. Conclusion: Negative cognitions and affective disturbances may contribute to higher treatment burden in couples seeking-assisted conception. The present study suggests that psychosocial intervention for couples plays a central role and should be integrated within the conventional treatments for infertility.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)180-189
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Human Reproductive Sciences
Volume11
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01-04-2018

Fingerprint

Cognition
Infertility
Fertility
Anxiety
Depression
Spouses
Therapeutics
Statistical Data Interpretation
Insemination
Nonparametric Statistics
Social Support
Psychiatry
Personality
Interviews
Psychology
Morbidity
Equipment and Supplies
Health

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Reproductive Medicine

Cite this

@article{c2ec447c959341dba6c679ae9f75e260,
title = "Illness cognitions, anxiety, and depression in men and women undergoing fertility treatments: A dyadic approach",
abstract = "Background: Emotional response to infertility is mediated by numerous interrelated psychological variables such as personality, health perceptions, cognitive appraisals, coping, and social support. While men and women respond to infertility differently, illness cognitions are a vital component of their emotional adjustment. The aim of this study is to compare the infertile men and women undergoing fertility treatments on perceived distress, helplessness, acceptance, benefits, anxiety, and depression. Materials and Methods: Eighty-one infertile couples, undergoing intrauterine insemination participated in the study. They were assessed on the presence of infertility distress using the fertility problem inventory, for psychiatric morbidity using the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview, for affective disturbances using the Hamilton Anxiety and Depression scales, and for illness cognitions using the Illness Cognition Questionnaire. Statistical Analysis: Data are analyzed using SPSS version 15. The paired sample t-test is performed for assessing differences on normally distributed data. The Wilcoxon Signed-Rank test is performed for assessing differences in medians obtained on data that was skewed. Results and Discussion: Infertile women (wives) were more emotionally distressed, anxious, and depressed than men (husbands). Gender-wise differences were found for perceptions of helplessness and acceptance of infertility. Infertility was perceived to be a nonbeneficial event for both partners investigated. Conclusion: Negative cognitions and affective disturbances may contribute to higher treatment burden in couples seeking-assisted conception. The present study suggests that psychosocial intervention for couples plays a central role and should be integrated within the conventional treatments for infertility.",
author = "Ansha Patel and Sharma, {P. S.V.N.} and Pratap Kumar and Binu, {V. S.}",
year = "2018",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.4103/jhrs.JHRS_119_17",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "180--189",
journal = "Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences",
issn = "0974-1208",
publisher = "Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd",
number = "2",

}

Illness cognitions, anxiety, and depression in men and women undergoing fertility treatments : A dyadic approach. / Patel, Ansha; Sharma, P. S.V.N.; Kumar, Pratap; Binu, V. S.

In: Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences, Vol. 11, No. 2, 01.04.2018, p. 180-189.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Illness cognitions, anxiety, and depression in men and women undergoing fertility treatments

T2 - A dyadic approach

AU - Patel, Ansha

AU - Sharma, P. S.V.N.

AU - Kumar, Pratap

AU - Binu, V. S.

PY - 2018/4/1

Y1 - 2018/4/1

N2 - Background: Emotional response to infertility is mediated by numerous interrelated psychological variables such as personality, health perceptions, cognitive appraisals, coping, and social support. While men and women respond to infertility differently, illness cognitions are a vital component of their emotional adjustment. The aim of this study is to compare the infertile men and women undergoing fertility treatments on perceived distress, helplessness, acceptance, benefits, anxiety, and depression. Materials and Methods: Eighty-one infertile couples, undergoing intrauterine insemination participated in the study. They were assessed on the presence of infertility distress using the fertility problem inventory, for psychiatric morbidity using the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview, for affective disturbances using the Hamilton Anxiety and Depression scales, and for illness cognitions using the Illness Cognition Questionnaire. Statistical Analysis: Data are analyzed using SPSS version 15. The paired sample t-test is performed for assessing differences on normally distributed data. The Wilcoxon Signed-Rank test is performed for assessing differences in medians obtained on data that was skewed. Results and Discussion: Infertile women (wives) were more emotionally distressed, anxious, and depressed than men (husbands). Gender-wise differences were found for perceptions of helplessness and acceptance of infertility. Infertility was perceived to be a nonbeneficial event for both partners investigated. Conclusion: Negative cognitions and affective disturbances may contribute to higher treatment burden in couples seeking-assisted conception. The present study suggests that psychosocial intervention for couples plays a central role and should be integrated within the conventional treatments for infertility.

AB - Background: Emotional response to infertility is mediated by numerous interrelated psychological variables such as personality, health perceptions, cognitive appraisals, coping, and social support. While men and women respond to infertility differently, illness cognitions are a vital component of their emotional adjustment. The aim of this study is to compare the infertile men and women undergoing fertility treatments on perceived distress, helplessness, acceptance, benefits, anxiety, and depression. Materials and Methods: Eighty-one infertile couples, undergoing intrauterine insemination participated in the study. They were assessed on the presence of infertility distress using the fertility problem inventory, for psychiatric morbidity using the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview, for affective disturbances using the Hamilton Anxiety and Depression scales, and for illness cognitions using the Illness Cognition Questionnaire. Statistical Analysis: Data are analyzed using SPSS version 15. The paired sample t-test is performed for assessing differences on normally distributed data. The Wilcoxon Signed-Rank test is performed for assessing differences in medians obtained on data that was skewed. Results and Discussion: Infertile women (wives) were more emotionally distressed, anxious, and depressed than men (husbands). Gender-wise differences were found for perceptions of helplessness and acceptance of infertility. Infertility was perceived to be a nonbeneficial event for both partners investigated. Conclusion: Negative cognitions and affective disturbances may contribute to higher treatment burden in couples seeking-assisted conception. The present study suggests that psychosocial intervention for couples plays a central role and should be integrated within the conventional treatments for infertility.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85051334597&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85051334597&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4103/jhrs.JHRS_119_17

DO - 10.4103/jhrs.JHRS_119_17

M3 - Article

VL - 11

SP - 180

EP - 189

JO - Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences

JF - Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences

SN - 0974-1208

IS - 2

ER -