Immediate effects of Mulligan's techniques on pain and functional mobility in individuals with knee osteoarthritis: A randomized control trial

Madhura Bhagat, Y. V.Raghava Neelapala, Ranganath Gangavelli

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    Background and Purpose: Mulligan's mobilization with movement was shown to be effective when implemented in multimodal therapy for knee osteoarthritis. However, no study has evaluated the Mulligan's technique in isolation and compared the relative effectiveness with sham-controlled interventions. Hence, the present study examined the immediate effects of Mulligan's techniques with sham mobilization on the numerical pain rating scale (NPRS) and timed up and go (TUG) test in individuals with knee osteoarthritis. Methods: Thirty participants (mean age: 55.3 ± 8.3 years) with symptoms at the knee and radiographic diagnosis of knee osteoarthritis were randomized into sham (n = 15) and intervention (n = 15) groups. The intervention (I) group received Mulligan's mobilization glides that resulted in relative pain relief for three sets of 10 repetitions. For the sham (S) group, the therapist's hand was placed over the joint surfaces mimicking the pain-relieving glides, without providing the gliding force. The outcome measures NPRS and TUG were recorded by a blinded assessor pre- and post-intervention. Results: Statistically significant differences were identified between the groups in post-intervention median (interquartile range) NPRS (I group: 4.00 [2.00–5.00]; S group: 6.00 [4.00–7.00]) and TUG scores (I group: 10.9 [9.43–10.45]; S group: 13.18 [10.38–16.00]) with the intervention group demonstrating better outcomes (p <.05). Within-group, the post-intervention scores of NPRS and TUG were significantly lower (p <.05) compared to the pre-intervention scores in the intervention group. In the sham group, a statistically significant pre–post change was noticed only in the NPRS scores but not in the TUG scores. Conclusion: Mulligan's techniques were effective in improving pain and functional mobility in individuals with knee osteoarthritis. The underlying mechanisms for observed effects must be examined further, as participants reported pain relief following sham mobilization.

    Original languageEnglish
    Article numbere1812
    JournalPhysiotherapy Research International
    DOIs
    Publication statusAccepted/In press - 01-01-2019

    Fingerprint

    Knee Osteoarthritis
    Pain
    Knee
    Hand
    Joints
    Outcome Assessment (Health Care)

    All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

    • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

    Cite this

    @article{53ea7e598971474daff09239b2fb4192,
    title = "Immediate effects of Mulligan's techniques on pain and functional mobility in individuals with knee osteoarthritis: A randomized control trial",
    abstract = "Background and Purpose: Mulligan's mobilization with movement was shown to be effective when implemented in multimodal therapy for knee osteoarthritis. However, no study has evaluated the Mulligan's technique in isolation and compared the relative effectiveness with sham-controlled interventions. Hence, the present study examined the immediate effects of Mulligan's techniques with sham mobilization on the numerical pain rating scale (NPRS) and timed up and go (TUG) test in individuals with knee osteoarthritis. Methods: Thirty participants (mean age: 55.3 ± 8.3 years) with symptoms at the knee and radiographic diagnosis of knee osteoarthritis were randomized into sham (n = 15) and intervention (n = 15) groups. The intervention (I) group received Mulligan's mobilization glides that resulted in relative pain relief for three sets of 10 repetitions. For the sham (S) group, the therapist's hand was placed over the joint surfaces mimicking the pain-relieving glides, without providing the gliding force. The outcome measures NPRS and TUG were recorded by a blinded assessor pre- and post-intervention. Results: Statistically significant differences were identified between the groups in post-intervention median (interquartile range) NPRS (I group: 4.00 [2.00–5.00]; S group: 6.00 [4.00–7.00]) and TUG scores (I group: 10.9 [9.43–10.45]; S group: 13.18 [10.38–16.00]) with the intervention group demonstrating better outcomes (p <.05). Within-group, the post-intervention scores of NPRS and TUG were significantly lower (p <.05) compared to the pre-intervention scores in the intervention group. In the sham group, a statistically significant pre–post change was noticed only in the NPRS scores but not in the TUG scores. Conclusion: Mulligan's techniques were effective in improving pain and functional mobility in individuals with knee osteoarthritis. The underlying mechanisms for observed effects must be examined further, as participants reported pain relief following sham mobilization.",
    author = "Madhura Bhagat and Neelapala, {Y. V.Raghava} and Ranganath Gangavelli",
    year = "2019",
    month = "1",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1002/pri.1812",
    language = "English",
    journal = "Physiotherapy Research International",
    issn = "1358-2267",
    publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",

    }

    Immediate effects of Mulligan's techniques on pain and functional mobility in individuals with knee osteoarthritis : A randomized control trial. / Bhagat, Madhura; Neelapala, Y. V.Raghava; Gangavelli, Ranganath.

    In: Physiotherapy Research International, 01.01.2019.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Immediate effects of Mulligan's techniques on pain and functional mobility in individuals with knee osteoarthritis

    T2 - A randomized control trial

    AU - Bhagat, Madhura

    AU - Neelapala, Y. V.Raghava

    AU - Gangavelli, Ranganath

    PY - 2019/1/1

    Y1 - 2019/1/1

    N2 - Background and Purpose: Mulligan's mobilization with movement was shown to be effective when implemented in multimodal therapy for knee osteoarthritis. However, no study has evaluated the Mulligan's technique in isolation and compared the relative effectiveness with sham-controlled interventions. Hence, the present study examined the immediate effects of Mulligan's techniques with sham mobilization on the numerical pain rating scale (NPRS) and timed up and go (TUG) test in individuals with knee osteoarthritis. Methods: Thirty participants (mean age: 55.3 ± 8.3 years) with symptoms at the knee and radiographic diagnosis of knee osteoarthritis were randomized into sham (n = 15) and intervention (n = 15) groups. The intervention (I) group received Mulligan's mobilization glides that resulted in relative pain relief for three sets of 10 repetitions. For the sham (S) group, the therapist's hand was placed over the joint surfaces mimicking the pain-relieving glides, without providing the gliding force. The outcome measures NPRS and TUG were recorded by a blinded assessor pre- and post-intervention. Results: Statistically significant differences were identified between the groups in post-intervention median (interquartile range) NPRS (I group: 4.00 [2.00–5.00]; S group: 6.00 [4.00–7.00]) and TUG scores (I group: 10.9 [9.43–10.45]; S group: 13.18 [10.38–16.00]) with the intervention group demonstrating better outcomes (p <.05). Within-group, the post-intervention scores of NPRS and TUG were significantly lower (p <.05) compared to the pre-intervention scores in the intervention group. In the sham group, a statistically significant pre–post change was noticed only in the NPRS scores but not in the TUG scores. Conclusion: Mulligan's techniques were effective in improving pain and functional mobility in individuals with knee osteoarthritis. The underlying mechanisms for observed effects must be examined further, as participants reported pain relief following sham mobilization.

    AB - Background and Purpose: Mulligan's mobilization with movement was shown to be effective when implemented in multimodal therapy for knee osteoarthritis. However, no study has evaluated the Mulligan's technique in isolation and compared the relative effectiveness with sham-controlled interventions. Hence, the present study examined the immediate effects of Mulligan's techniques with sham mobilization on the numerical pain rating scale (NPRS) and timed up and go (TUG) test in individuals with knee osteoarthritis. Methods: Thirty participants (mean age: 55.3 ± 8.3 years) with symptoms at the knee and radiographic diagnosis of knee osteoarthritis were randomized into sham (n = 15) and intervention (n = 15) groups. The intervention (I) group received Mulligan's mobilization glides that resulted in relative pain relief for three sets of 10 repetitions. For the sham (S) group, the therapist's hand was placed over the joint surfaces mimicking the pain-relieving glides, without providing the gliding force. The outcome measures NPRS and TUG were recorded by a blinded assessor pre- and post-intervention. Results: Statistically significant differences were identified between the groups in post-intervention median (interquartile range) NPRS (I group: 4.00 [2.00–5.00]; S group: 6.00 [4.00–7.00]) and TUG scores (I group: 10.9 [9.43–10.45]; S group: 13.18 [10.38–16.00]) with the intervention group demonstrating better outcomes (p <.05). Within-group, the post-intervention scores of NPRS and TUG were significantly lower (p <.05) compared to the pre-intervention scores in the intervention group. In the sham group, a statistically significant pre–post change was noticed only in the NPRS scores but not in the TUG scores. Conclusion: Mulligan's techniques were effective in improving pain and functional mobility in individuals with knee osteoarthritis. The underlying mechanisms for observed effects must be examined further, as participants reported pain relief following sham mobilization.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85072035990&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85072035990&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1002/pri.1812

    DO - 10.1002/pri.1812

    M3 - Article

    AN - SCOPUS:85072035990

    JO - Physiotherapy Research International

    JF - Physiotherapy Research International

    SN - 1358-2267

    M1 - e1812

    ER -