In vitro comparison of compressive strength of bulk-fill composites and nanohybrid composite

K. Pradeep, Kishore Ginjupalli, M. A. Kuttappa, Adarsh Kudva, Roshni Butula

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: The objective of this study is to measure and compare the compressive strength of two bulk-fill posterior composites (Smart dentin replacement or SDR and Filtek bulk fill) with universal nanohybrid composite (Filtek Z 250XT). Materials and methods: In this in vitro study, three different types of posterior composites are used as follows: Group 1 – SDR (Dentsply, Konstanz, Germany); group 2 – Filtek bulk-fill (3M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA); group 3 – Filtek Z-250XT (3M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA). Ten cylindrical samples of 6 mm height and 4 mm diameter in each group were made using a split brass mold. The composites filled in the brass mold were photopolymerized using light-emitting diode (LED) light-curing unit and the cured samples were stored in water at 37°C for 48 hours before testing. The compressive strength of the stored samples was tested using universal testing machine (Instron 3366, UK) at a cross-head speed of 0.5 mm/minute. The compressive strength was calculated by dividing the maximum load with area of the samples. Results: Results are statistically analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey’s post hoc test. Analysis showed that SDR and Filtek bulk-fill have greater compressive strength than Filtek Z-250 (p < 0.05). However, there is no statistical difference between compressive strength of SDR and Filtek bulk-fill composites (p > 0.05).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)119-122
Number of pages4
JournalWorld Journal of Dentistry
Volume7
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01-07-2016

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Dentistry(all)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'In vitro comparison of compressive strength of bulk-fill composites and nanohybrid composite'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this