Influence of channel and ChannelFree™ processing technology on the vocal parameters in hearing-impaired individuals

Gopika Kodiyath, Kishan Mohan, Rajashekhar Bellur

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    Introduction: Hearing loss is common in all age ranged population. Hearing loss leads to poor speech perception in quiet and more in noisy situation. Intact system over comes problem by masking release ability and its mechanism however impaired system fails to do. Hearing aid being common rehabilitation option, strategies and technology tries to support better speech perception in noise. Hence comparative studies of technology and strategies for the betterment of impaired population are needed. Objective of the Study: Enhancing speech perception is being the mainstay of hearing aid manufactures, Comparison of ChannelFreeTM, novel technology which claiming superior speech perception with channel hearing aids, specifically for competing signals is the objective. Materials and Methods: Thirty-three clients fitted with multi-channel and ChannelFreeTM with noise reductions (NR) On, Off condition. Comodulated and Uncomodulated masking release was the outcome measure in free field condition through audiometer. Results: Overall, ChannelFreeTM performed superior over channel hearing aids. Effect of channels, NR, and modulation type of background noise played key role. Perceptually, ChannelFreeTM was significantly preferred, especially in the first time users. Conclusion: ChannelFreeTM hearing aid strategies and NR are able to process incoming signal faster in order to retain the spectral contrast and also facilitate temporal cues from the amplified speech in noise. Acclimatization period has a vital role. Updating and implementing the validated novel technologies for the hearing impaired individual is recommended.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)21-26
    Number of pages6
    JournalIndian Journal of Otology
    Volume23
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 01-01-2017

    Fingerprint

    Hearing Aids
    Hearing
    Noise
    Speech Perception
    Technology
    Hearing Loss
    Aptitude
    Acclimatization
    Population
    Cues
    Rehabilitation
    Outcome Assessment (Health Care)

    All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

    • Otorhinolaryngology

    Cite this

    Kodiyath, Gopika ; Mohan, Kishan ; Bellur, Rajashekhar. / Influence of channel and ChannelFree™ processing technology on the vocal parameters in hearing-impaired individuals. In: Indian Journal of Otology. 2017 ; Vol. 23, No. 1. pp. 21-26.
    @article{50b3b322d7ea4f52b77531a3a111b84c,
    title = "Influence of channel and ChannelFree™ processing technology on the vocal parameters in hearing-impaired individuals",
    abstract = "Introduction: Hearing loss is common in all age ranged population. Hearing loss leads to poor speech perception in quiet and more in noisy situation. Intact system over comes problem by masking release ability and its mechanism however impaired system fails to do. Hearing aid being common rehabilitation option, strategies and technology tries to support better speech perception in noise. Hence comparative studies of technology and strategies for the betterment of impaired population are needed. Objective of the Study: Enhancing speech perception is being the mainstay of hearing aid manufactures, Comparison of ChannelFreeTM, novel technology which claiming superior speech perception with channel hearing aids, specifically for competing signals is the objective. Materials and Methods: Thirty-three clients fitted with multi-channel and ChannelFreeTM with noise reductions (NR) On, Off condition. Comodulated and Uncomodulated masking release was the outcome measure in free field condition through audiometer. Results: Overall, ChannelFreeTM performed superior over channel hearing aids. Effect of channels, NR, and modulation type of background noise played key role. Perceptually, ChannelFreeTM was significantly preferred, especially in the first time users. Conclusion: ChannelFreeTM hearing aid strategies and NR are able to process incoming signal faster in order to retain the spectral contrast and also facilitate temporal cues from the amplified speech in noise. Acclimatization period has a vital role. Updating and implementing the validated novel technologies for the hearing impaired individual is recommended.",
    author = "Gopika Kodiyath and Kishan Mohan and Rajashekhar Bellur",
    year = "2017",
    month = "1",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.4103/0971-7749.199506",
    language = "English",
    volume = "23",
    pages = "21--26",
    journal = "Indian Journal of Otology",
    issn = "0971-7749",
    publisher = "Indian Journal of Otology",
    number = "1",

    }

    Influence of channel and ChannelFree™ processing technology on the vocal parameters in hearing-impaired individuals. / Kodiyath, Gopika; Mohan, Kishan; Bellur, Rajashekhar.

    In: Indian Journal of Otology, Vol. 23, No. 1, 01.01.2017, p. 21-26.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Influence of channel and ChannelFree™ processing technology on the vocal parameters in hearing-impaired individuals

    AU - Kodiyath, Gopika

    AU - Mohan, Kishan

    AU - Bellur, Rajashekhar

    PY - 2017/1/1

    Y1 - 2017/1/1

    N2 - Introduction: Hearing loss is common in all age ranged population. Hearing loss leads to poor speech perception in quiet and more in noisy situation. Intact system over comes problem by masking release ability and its mechanism however impaired system fails to do. Hearing aid being common rehabilitation option, strategies and technology tries to support better speech perception in noise. Hence comparative studies of technology and strategies for the betterment of impaired population are needed. Objective of the Study: Enhancing speech perception is being the mainstay of hearing aid manufactures, Comparison of ChannelFreeTM, novel technology which claiming superior speech perception with channel hearing aids, specifically for competing signals is the objective. Materials and Methods: Thirty-three clients fitted with multi-channel and ChannelFreeTM with noise reductions (NR) On, Off condition. Comodulated and Uncomodulated masking release was the outcome measure in free field condition through audiometer. Results: Overall, ChannelFreeTM performed superior over channel hearing aids. Effect of channels, NR, and modulation type of background noise played key role. Perceptually, ChannelFreeTM was significantly preferred, especially in the first time users. Conclusion: ChannelFreeTM hearing aid strategies and NR are able to process incoming signal faster in order to retain the spectral contrast and also facilitate temporal cues from the amplified speech in noise. Acclimatization period has a vital role. Updating and implementing the validated novel technologies for the hearing impaired individual is recommended.

    AB - Introduction: Hearing loss is common in all age ranged population. Hearing loss leads to poor speech perception in quiet and more in noisy situation. Intact system over comes problem by masking release ability and its mechanism however impaired system fails to do. Hearing aid being common rehabilitation option, strategies and technology tries to support better speech perception in noise. Hence comparative studies of technology and strategies for the betterment of impaired population are needed. Objective of the Study: Enhancing speech perception is being the mainstay of hearing aid manufactures, Comparison of ChannelFreeTM, novel technology which claiming superior speech perception with channel hearing aids, specifically for competing signals is the objective. Materials and Methods: Thirty-three clients fitted with multi-channel and ChannelFreeTM with noise reductions (NR) On, Off condition. Comodulated and Uncomodulated masking release was the outcome measure in free field condition through audiometer. Results: Overall, ChannelFreeTM performed superior over channel hearing aids. Effect of channels, NR, and modulation type of background noise played key role. Perceptually, ChannelFreeTM was significantly preferred, especially in the first time users. Conclusion: ChannelFreeTM hearing aid strategies and NR are able to process incoming signal faster in order to retain the spectral contrast and also facilitate temporal cues from the amplified speech in noise. Acclimatization period has a vital role. Updating and implementing the validated novel technologies for the hearing impaired individual is recommended.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85012186809&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85012186809&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.4103/0971-7749.199506

    DO - 10.4103/0971-7749.199506

    M3 - Article

    VL - 23

    SP - 21

    EP - 26

    JO - Indian Journal of Otology

    JF - Indian Journal of Otology

    SN - 0971-7749

    IS - 1

    ER -