Intubation in maxillofacial trauma-a dilemma

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Complex midfacial or panfacial injuries often require tracheostomy to ensure a free operative field. Oral intubation can interfere with assessment of occlusion and nasal tracheal intubation may lead to complications (brain damage, leakage of cerebrospinal fluid, and meningitis) when there are also fractures of the base of the skull. On the other hand, tracheostomy is associated with complications such as haemorrhage, pneumomediastinum or pneumothorax, injury to the recurrent laryngeal nerve, and tracheal stenosis and should be reserved for severely injured patients who need protracted assistance with ventilation or further operations. A useful alternative method of managing the airway intraoperatively are by submental endotracheal intubation and retromolar intubation. Submental intubation allows tracheal intubation by passing the tube through a submental skin incision into the mouth. Retromolar intubation is a non-invasive technique and avoids both submental tracheal intubation and tracheostomy in the majority of patients.In this paper two cases of maxillofacial injury, operated one using submental technique and another with retromolar intubation are reported.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)237-240
Number of pages4
JournalIndian Journal of Public Health Research and Development
Volume3
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 01-07-2012

Fingerprint

Intubation
Wounds and Injuries
Tracheostomy
Laryngostenosis
Maxillofacial Injuries
Tracheal Stenosis
Mediastinal Emphysema
Intratracheal Intubation
Skull Base
Pneumothorax
Meningitis
Nose
Ventilation
Mouth
Hemorrhage
Skin
Brain

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

@article{5c2549485efc4d39bed27471743b9947,
title = "Intubation in maxillofacial trauma-a dilemma",
abstract = "Complex midfacial or panfacial injuries often require tracheostomy to ensure a free operative field. Oral intubation can interfere with assessment of occlusion and nasal tracheal intubation may lead to complications (brain damage, leakage of cerebrospinal fluid, and meningitis) when there are also fractures of the base of the skull. On the other hand, tracheostomy is associated with complications such as haemorrhage, pneumomediastinum or pneumothorax, injury to the recurrent laryngeal nerve, and tracheal stenosis and should be reserved for severely injured patients who need protracted assistance with ventilation or further operations. A useful alternative method of managing the airway intraoperatively are by submental endotracheal intubation and retromolar intubation. Submental intubation allows tracheal intubation by passing the tube through a submental skin incision into the mouth. Retromolar intubation is a non-invasive technique and avoids both submental tracheal intubation and tracheostomy in the majority of patients.In this paper two cases of maxillofacial injury, operated one using submental technique and another with retromolar intubation are reported.",
author = "B. Vidya and Cariappa, {K. M.} and {Abhay Kamath}, T.",
year = "2012",
month = "7",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "3",
pages = "237--240",
journal = "Indian Journal of Public Health Research and Development",
issn = "0976-0245",
publisher = "R.K. Sharma, Institute of Medico-Legal Publications",
number = "3",

}

Intubation in maxillofacial trauma-a dilemma. / Vidya, B.; Cariappa, K. M.; Abhay Kamath, T.

In: Indian Journal of Public Health Research and Development, Vol. 3, No. 3, 01.07.2012, p. 237-240.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Intubation in maxillofacial trauma-a dilemma

AU - Vidya, B.

AU - Cariappa, K. M.

AU - Abhay Kamath, T.

PY - 2012/7/1

Y1 - 2012/7/1

N2 - Complex midfacial or panfacial injuries often require tracheostomy to ensure a free operative field. Oral intubation can interfere with assessment of occlusion and nasal tracheal intubation may lead to complications (brain damage, leakage of cerebrospinal fluid, and meningitis) when there are also fractures of the base of the skull. On the other hand, tracheostomy is associated with complications such as haemorrhage, pneumomediastinum or pneumothorax, injury to the recurrent laryngeal nerve, and tracheal stenosis and should be reserved for severely injured patients who need protracted assistance with ventilation or further operations. A useful alternative method of managing the airway intraoperatively are by submental endotracheal intubation and retromolar intubation. Submental intubation allows tracheal intubation by passing the tube through a submental skin incision into the mouth. Retromolar intubation is a non-invasive technique and avoids both submental tracheal intubation and tracheostomy in the majority of patients.In this paper two cases of maxillofacial injury, operated one using submental technique and another with retromolar intubation are reported.

AB - Complex midfacial or panfacial injuries often require tracheostomy to ensure a free operative field. Oral intubation can interfere with assessment of occlusion and nasal tracheal intubation may lead to complications (brain damage, leakage of cerebrospinal fluid, and meningitis) when there are also fractures of the base of the skull. On the other hand, tracheostomy is associated with complications such as haemorrhage, pneumomediastinum or pneumothorax, injury to the recurrent laryngeal nerve, and tracheal stenosis and should be reserved for severely injured patients who need protracted assistance with ventilation or further operations. A useful alternative method of managing the airway intraoperatively are by submental endotracheal intubation and retromolar intubation. Submental intubation allows tracheal intubation by passing the tube through a submental skin incision into the mouth. Retromolar intubation is a non-invasive technique and avoids both submental tracheal intubation and tracheostomy in the majority of patients.In this paper two cases of maxillofacial injury, operated one using submental technique and another with retromolar intubation are reported.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84871745526&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84871745526&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84871745526

VL - 3

SP - 237

EP - 240

JO - Indian Journal of Public Health Research and Development

JF - Indian Journal of Public Health Research and Development

SN - 0976-0245

IS - 3

ER -