Levels of Myeloperoxidase and Alkaline Phosphatase in Periimplant Sulcus Fluid in Health and Disease and after Nonsurgical Therapy

Nikita Malik, Dilip Naik, Ashita Uppoor

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: The study evaluated 2 biomarkers (myeloperoxidase [MPO] and alkaline phosphatase) along with clinical parameters in periimplant sulcus fluid (PISF) in conditions of periimplant health and disease. The effect of nonsurgical therapy was also evaluated on the biochemical and clinical parameters in diseased implants at 3 months after the baseline. Materials and Methods: A total number of 30 implants were studied in 20 subjects and divided into healthy group (group 1) and periimplant disease group (group 2). PISF was collected in both groups along with recording of clinical parameters. The periimplant disease group was then instituted a nonsurgical anti-infective therapy. The clinical and biochemical parameters were evaluated and compared at baseline and at the end of 3 months. Results: Group 2 showed statistically significant higher PISF MPO values at baseline as compared with groups 1 and 2 (at 3 months) (P < 0.001). Also, difference in the mean value of PISF MPO in group 2 (at 3 months) was greater than that in group 1 and was statistically nonsignificant (P 1.85). Conclusion: Within confines of the study, it can be concluded that evaluation of biochemical markers in PISF can be a useful diagnostic tool to aid the clinician in decision making regarding the management of the condition. ©

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)434-440
Number of pages7
JournalImplant Dentistry
Volume24
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01-01-2015

Fingerprint

Peroxidase
Alkaline Phosphatase
Health
Biomarkers
Therapeutics
Decision Making

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Oral Surgery

Cite this

@article{e94a962fe7c24ebab524636d61d85f70,
title = "Levels of Myeloperoxidase and Alkaline Phosphatase in Periimplant Sulcus Fluid in Health and Disease and after Nonsurgical Therapy",
abstract = "Purpose: The study evaluated 2 biomarkers (myeloperoxidase [MPO] and alkaline phosphatase) along with clinical parameters in periimplant sulcus fluid (PISF) in conditions of periimplant health and disease. The effect of nonsurgical therapy was also evaluated on the biochemical and clinical parameters in diseased implants at 3 months after the baseline. Materials and Methods: A total number of 30 implants were studied in 20 subjects and divided into healthy group (group 1) and periimplant disease group (group 2). PISF was collected in both groups along with recording of clinical parameters. The periimplant disease group was then instituted a nonsurgical anti-infective therapy. The clinical and biochemical parameters were evaluated and compared at baseline and at the end of 3 months. Results: Group 2 showed statistically significant higher PISF MPO values at baseline as compared with groups 1 and 2 (at 3 months) (P < 0.001). Also, difference in the mean value of PISF MPO in group 2 (at 3 months) was greater than that in group 1 and was statistically nonsignificant (P 1.85). Conclusion: Within confines of the study, it can be concluded that evaluation of biochemical markers in PISF can be a useful diagnostic tool to aid the clinician in decision making regarding the management of the condition. {\circledC}",
author = "Nikita Malik and Dilip Naik and Ashita Uppoor",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/ID.0000000000000277",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "434--440",
journal = "Implant Dentistry",
issn = "1056-6163",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Levels of Myeloperoxidase and Alkaline Phosphatase in Periimplant Sulcus Fluid in Health and Disease and after Nonsurgical Therapy

AU - Malik, Nikita

AU - Naik, Dilip

AU - Uppoor, Ashita

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Purpose: The study evaluated 2 biomarkers (myeloperoxidase [MPO] and alkaline phosphatase) along with clinical parameters in periimplant sulcus fluid (PISF) in conditions of periimplant health and disease. The effect of nonsurgical therapy was also evaluated on the biochemical and clinical parameters in diseased implants at 3 months after the baseline. Materials and Methods: A total number of 30 implants were studied in 20 subjects and divided into healthy group (group 1) and periimplant disease group (group 2). PISF was collected in both groups along with recording of clinical parameters. The periimplant disease group was then instituted a nonsurgical anti-infective therapy. The clinical and biochemical parameters were evaluated and compared at baseline and at the end of 3 months. Results: Group 2 showed statistically significant higher PISF MPO values at baseline as compared with groups 1 and 2 (at 3 months) (P < 0.001). Also, difference in the mean value of PISF MPO in group 2 (at 3 months) was greater than that in group 1 and was statistically nonsignificant (P 1.85). Conclusion: Within confines of the study, it can be concluded that evaluation of biochemical markers in PISF can be a useful diagnostic tool to aid the clinician in decision making regarding the management of the condition. ©

AB - Purpose: The study evaluated 2 biomarkers (myeloperoxidase [MPO] and alkaline phosphatase) along with clinical parameters in periimplant sulcus fluid (PISF) in conditions of periimplant health and disease. The effect of nonsurgical therapy was also evaluated on the biochemical and clinical parameters in diseased implants at 3 months after the baseline. Materials and Methods: A total number of 30 implants were studied in 20 subjects and divided into healthy group (group 1) and periimplant disease group (group 2). PISF was collected in both groups along with recording of clinical parameters. The periimplant disease group was then instituted a nonsurgical anti-infective therapy. The clinical and biochemical parameters were evaluated and compared at baseline and at the end of 3 months. Results: Group 2 showed statistically significant higher PISF MPO values at baseline as compared with groups 1 and 2 (at 3 months) (P < 0.001). Also, difference in the mean value of PISF MPO in group 2 (at 3 months) was greater than that in group 1 and was statistically nonsignificant (P 1.85). Conclusion: Within confines of the study, it can be concluded that evaluation of biochemical markers in PISF can be a useful diagnostic tool to aid the clinician in decision making regarding the management of the condition. ©

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84938575143&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84938575143&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/ID.0000000000000277

DO - 10.1097/ID.0000000000000277

M3 - Article

C2 - 25996788

AN - SCOPUS:84938575143

VL - 24

SP - 434

EP - 440

JO - Implant Dentistry

JF - Implant Dentistry

SN - 1056-6163

IS - 4

ER -