Macular thickness in diabetic retinopathy without clinically significant macular edema: A prospective study

Krishna Rao, Ravi Chandra, Lavanya Rao, S. Shailaja, Manali Hazarika

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Aim: To measure macular thickness by optical coherence tomography (OCT) in various grades of diabetic retinopathy with no clinically significant macular edema (CSME) and its comparison with non-diabetics. Design: Prospective cross–sectional study. Methods: Macular thickness was measured by OCT in 72 healthy volunteers (107 control eyes), 45 patients with mild and moderate non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) (78 eyes), and 37 patients with severe NPDR and proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) (66 eyes). Patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) as assessed by stereoscopic evaluation or photographs were excluded. One-way ANOVA test to compare the mean thickness and Tukey’s test for multiple comparison between groups were used. Results: Central subfield thickness (CST) was 238.57 ± 25.077 µm, 251.22 ± 24.649 µm, and 270.45 ± 28.956 µm in the three groups respectively. As the severity of retinopathy increased, the macular thickness significantly increased (p = < 0.001) in all the nine zones on OCT. There was a significant increase in CST noted in all the grades of retinopathy when compared with non-diabetics (p = 0.004, p = < 0.0001). No significant difference in macular thickness was noted between genders, irrespective of their groups (p = 0.72), or between the three groups in all the nine zones (p = 0.609). Conclusion: There is a significant increase in CST in all grades of retinopathy, as well as with increasing severity of retinopathy when compared to non-diabetics. This warrants the need to obtain OCT measurements even in patients with moderate NPDR without CSME to rule out subclinical DME.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)64-78
Number of pages15
JournalAsian Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume16
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 01-01-2018

Fingerprint

Macular Edema
Diabetic Retinopathy
Optical Coherence Tomography
Prospective Studies
Analysis of Variance
Healthy Volunteers

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

@article{973bec6c83874cf28455f5a364c6a925,
title = "Macular thickness in diabetic retinopathy without clinically significant macular edema: A prospective study",
abstract = "Aim: To measure macular thickness by optical coherence tomography (OCT) in various grades of diabetic retinopathy with no clinically significant macular edema (CSME) and its comparison with non-diabetics. Design: Prospective cross–sectional study. Methods: Macular thickness was measured by OCT in 72 healthy volunteers (107 control eyes), 45 patients with mild and moderate non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) (78 eyes), and 37 patients with severe NPDR and proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) (66 eyes). Patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) as assessed by stereoscopic evaluation or photographs were excluded. One-way ANOVA test to compare the mean thickness and Tukey’s test for multiple comparison between groups were used. Results: Central subfield thickness (CST) was 238.57 ± 25.077 µm, 251.22 ± 24.649 µm, and 270.45 ± 28.956 µm in the three groups respectively. As the severity of retinopathy increased, the macular thickness significantly increased (p = < 0.001) in all the nine zones on OCT. There was a significant increase in CST noted in all the grades of retinopathy when compared with non-diabetics (p = 0.004, p = < 0.0001). No significant difference in macular thickness was noted between genders, irrespective of their groups (p = 0.72), or between the three groups in all the nine zones (p = 0.609). Conclusion: There is a significant increase in CST in all grades of retinopathy, as well as with increasing severity of retinopathy when compared to non-diabetics. This warrants the need to obtain OCT measurements even in patients with moderate NPDR without CSME to rule out subclinical DME.",
author = "Krishna Rao and Ravi Chandra and Lavanya Rao and S. Shailaja and Manali Hazarika",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "64--78",
journal = "Asian Journal of Ophthalmology",
issn = "1560-2133",
publisher = "Scientific Communications International Ltd.",
number = "2",

}

Macular thickness in diabetic retinopathy without clinically significant macular edema : A prospective study. / Rao, Krishna; Chandra, Ravi; Rao, Lavanya; Shailaja, S.; Hazarika, Manali.

In: Asian Journal of Ophthalmology, Vol. 16, No. 2, 01.01.2018, p. 64-78.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Macular thickness in diabetic retinopathy without clinically significant macular edema

T2 - A prospective study

AU - Rao, Krishna

AU - Chandra, Ravi

AU - Rao, Lavanya

AU - Shailaja, S.

AU - Hazarika, Manali

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Aim: To measure macular thickness by optical coherence tomography (OCT) in various grades of diabetic retinopathy with no clinically significant macular edema (CSME) and its comparison with non-diabetics. Design: Prospective cross–sectional study. Methods: Macular thickness was measured by OCT in 72 healthy volunteers (107 control eyes), 45 patients with mild and moderate non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) (78 eyes), and 37 patients with severe NPDR and proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) (66 eyes). Patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) as assessed by stereoscopic evaluation or photographs were excluded. One-way ANOVA test to compare the mean thickness and Tukey’s test for multiple comparison between groups were used. Results: Central subfield thickness (CST) was 238.57 ± 25.077 µm, 251.22 ± 24.649 µm, and 270.45 ± 28.956 µm in the three groups respectively. As the severity of retinopathy increased, the macular thickness significantly increased (p = < 0.001) in all the nine zones on OCT. There was a significant increase in CST noted in all the grades of retinopathy when compared with non-diabetics (p = 0.004, p = < 0.0001). No significant difference in macular thickness was noted between genders, irrespective of their groups (p = 0.72), or between the three groups in all the nine zones (p = 0.609). Conclusion: There is a significant increase in CST in all grades of retinopathy, as well as with increasing severity of retinopathy when compared to non-diabetics. This warrants the need to obtain OCT measurements even in patients with moderate NPDR without CSME to rule out subclinical DME.

AB - Aim: To measure macular thickness by optical coherence tomography (OCT) in various grades of diabetic retinopathy with no clinically significant macular edema (CSME) and its comparison with non-diabetics. Design: Prospective cross–sectional study. Methods: Macular thickness was measured by OCT in 72 healthy volunteers (107 control eyes), 45 patients with mild and moderate non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) (78 eyes), and 37 patients with severe NPDR and proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) (66 eyes). Patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) as assessed by stereoscopic evaluation or photographs were excluded. One-way ANOVA test to compare the mean thickness and Tukey’s test for multiple comparison between groups were used. Results: Central subfield thickness (CST) was 238.57 ± 25.077 µm, 251.22 ± 24.649 µm, and 270.45 ± 28.956 µm in the three groups respectively. As the severity of retinopathy increased, the macular thickness significantly increased (p = < 0.001) in all the nine zones on OCT. There was a significant increase in CST noted in all the grades of retinopathy when compared with non-diabetics (p = 0.004, p = < 0.0001). No significant difference in macular thickness was noted between genders, irrespective of their groups (p = 0.72), or between the three groups in all the nine zones (p = 0.609). Conclusion: There is a significant increase in CST in all grades of retinopathy, as well as with increasing severity of retinopathy when compared to non-diabetics. This warrants the need to obtain OCT measurements even in patients with moderate NPDR without CSME to rule out subclinical DME.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064927282&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85064927282&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85064927282

VL - 16

SP - 64

EP - 78

JO - Asian Journal of Ophthalmology

JF - Asian Journal of Ophthalmology

SN - 1560-2133

IS - 2

ER -