Management of non-traumatic avascular necrosis of the femoral head—a comparative analysis of the outcome of multiple small diameter drilling and core decompression with fibular grafting

S. P. Mohanty, K. A. Singh, R. Kundangar, V. Shankar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of multiple small diameter drilling and core decompression with fibular strut grafting in the management of non-traumatic avascular necrosis (AVN) of the femoral head. Materials and methods: Outcomes of patients with AVN treated by multiple small diameter drilling (group 1) were compared retrospectively with patients treated by core decompression and fibular grafting (group 2). Harris hip score (HHS) was used to assess the clinical status pre- and postoperatively. Modified Ficat and Arlet classification was used to assess the radiological stage pre- and postoperatively. Results: Forty-six patients (68 hips) were included in this study. Group 1 consisted of 33 hips, and group 2 consisted of 35 hips. In stages I and IIB, there was no statistically significant difference in the final HHS between the two groups. However, in stages IIA and III, hips in group 2 had a better final HHS (P < 0.05). In terms of radiographic progression, there was no statistical difference between hips in stages I, IIA and stage IIB. However, in stage III, hips belonging to group 2 had better results (P < 0.05). Kaplan–Meier survivorship analysis showed better outcome in group 2 in stage III (P < 0.05). Conclusions: Hips with AVN in the precollapse stage can be salvaged by core decompression with or without fibular grafting. Multiple small diameter drilling is relatively simple and carries less morbidity and hence preferred in stages I and II. However, in stage III disease, core decompression with fibular strut grafting gives better results.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)59-66
Number of pages8
JournalMusculoskeletal Surgery
Volume101
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01-04-2017

Fingerprint

Thigh
Decompression
Hip
Necrosis
Femur Head Necrosis
Survival Rate
Morbidity

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

@article{f134e8ed312b48f78faf5d0a0cc37c8c,
title = "Management of non-traumatic avascular necrosis of the femoral head—a comparative analysis of the outcome of multiple small diameter drilling and core decompression with fibular grafting",
abstract = "Background: The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of multiple small diameter drilling and core decompression with fibular strut grafting in the management of non-traumatic avascular necrosis (AVN) of the femoral head. Materials and methods: Outcomes of patients with AVN treated by multiple small diameter drilling (group 1) were compared retrospectively with patients treated by core decompression and fibular grafting (group 2). Harris hip score (HHS) was used to assess the clinical status pre- and postoperatively. Modified Ficat and Arlet classification was used to assess the radiological stage pre- and postoperatively. Results: Forty-six patients (68 hips) were included in this study. Group 1 consisted of 33 hips, and group 2 consisted of 35 hips. In stages I and IIB, there was no statistically significant difference in the final HHS between the two groups. However, in stages IIA and III, hips in group 2 had a better final HHS (P < 0.05). In terms of radiographic progression, there was no statistical difference between hips in stages I, IIA and stage IIB. However, in stage III, hips belonging to group 2 had better results (P < 0.05). Kaplan–Meier survivorship analysis showed better outcome in group 2 in stage III (P < 0.05). Conclusions: Hips with AVN in the precollapse stage can be salvaged by core decompression with or without fibular grafting. Multiple small diameter drilling is relatively simple and carries less morbidity and hence preferred in stages I and II. However, in stage III disease, core decompression with fibular strut grafting gives better results.",
author = "Mohanty, {S. P.} and Singh, {K. A.} and R. Kundangar and V. Shankar",
year = "2017",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s12306-016-0431-2",
language = "English",
volume = "101",
pages = "59--66",
journal = "Musculoskeletal Surgery",
issn = "2035-5106",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "1",

}

Management of non-traumatic avascular necrosis of the femoral head—a comparative analysis of the outcome of multiple small diameter drilling and core decompression with fibular grafting. / Mohanty, S. P.; Singh, K. A.; Kundangar, R.; Shankar, V.

In: Musculoskeletal Surgery, Vol. 101, No. 1, 01.04.2017, p. 59-66.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Management of non-traumatic avascular necrosis of the femoral head—a comparative analysis of the outcome of multiple small diameter drilling and core decompression with fibular grafting

AU - Mohanty, S. P.

AU - Singh, K. A.

AU - Kundangar, R.

AU - Shankar, V.

PY - 2017/4/1

Y1 - 2017/4/1

N2 - Background: The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of multiple small diameter drilling and core decompression with fibular strut grafting in the management of non-traumatic avascular necrosis (AVN) of the femoral head. Materials and methods: Outcomes of patients with AVN treated by multiple small diameter drilling (group 1) were compared retrospectively with patients treated by core decompression and fibular grafting (group 2). Harris hip score (HHS) was used to assess the clinical status pre- and postoperatively. Modified Ficat and Arlet classification was used to assess the radiological stage pre- and postoperatively. Results: Forty-six patients (68 hips) were included in this study. Group 1 consisted of 33 hips, and group 2 consisted of 35 hips. In stages I and IIB, there was no statistically significant difference in the final HHS between the two groups. However, in stages IIA and III, hips in group 2 had a better final HHS (P < 0.05). In terms of radiographic progression, there was no statistical difference between hips in stages I, IIA and stage IIB. However, in stage III, hips belonging to group 2 had better results (P < 0.05). Kaplan–Meier survivorship analysis showed better outcome in group 2 in stage III (P < 0.05). Conclusions: Hips with AVN in the precollapse stage can be salvaged by core decompression with or without fibular grafting. Multiple small diameter drilling is relatively simple and carries less morbidity and hence preferred in stages I and II. However, in stage III disease, core decompression with fibular strut grafting gives better results.

AB - Background: The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of multiple small diameter drilling and core decompression with fibular strut grafting in the management of non-traumatic avascular necrosis (AVN) of the femoral head. Materials and methods: Outcomes of patients with AVN treated by multiple small diameter drilling (group 1) were compared retrospectively with patients treated by core decompression and fibular grafting (group 2). Harris hip score (HHS) was used to assess the clinical status pre- and postoperatively. Modified Ficat and Arlet classification was used to assess the radiological stage pre- and postoperatively. Results: Forty-six patients (68 hips) were included in this study. Group 1 consisted of 33 hips, and group 2 consisted of 35 hips. In stages I and IIB, there was no statistically significant difference in the final HHS between the two groups. However, in stages IIA and III, hips in group 2 had a better final HHS (P < 0.05). In terms of radiographic progression, there was no statistical difference between hips in stages I, IIA and stage IIB. However, in stage III, hips belonging to group 2 had better results (P < 0.05). Kaplan–Meier survivorship analysis showed better outcome in group 2 in stage III (P < 0.05). Conclusions: Hips with AVN in the precollapse stage can be salvaged by core decompression with or without fibular grafting. Multiple small diameter drilling is relatively simple and carries less morbidity and hence preferred in stages I and II. However, in stage III disease, core decompression with fibular strut grafting gives better results.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85016597491&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85016597491&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s12306-016-0431-2

DO - 10.1007/s12306-016-0431-2

M3 - Article

C2 - 27757848

AN - SCOPUS:85016597491

VL - 101

SP - 59

EP - 66

JO - Musculoskeletal Surgery

JF - Musculoskeletal Surgery

SN - 2035-5106

IS - 1

ER -