### Abstract

The ^{58}Ni(n,p)^{58}Co reaction cross sections have been measured relative to two monitors: The cross sections for the formation of the 97Zr fission product in neutron-induced fission of (a) ^{232}Th and of(b) ^{238}U. It is demonstrated how to generate and combine covariance matrices (using partial uncertainties and microcorrelations) in relative measurements at various stages like efficiency calibration of the high-purity germanium detector, using the ratio of^{58}Ni(n,p)^{58}Co reaction cross section relative to monitor cross section, and in the process of normalization. We further illustrate the weighted averaging of equivalent data as applicable in relative measurements. We provide the necessary data and the corresponding table of partial uncertainties as required for compilation in the EXchange-FORmat (EXFOR) database. This helps, in principle, anyone to generate and verify the steps in the calculation of the covariance matrices in the present work. We believe that it is important for all nuclear experimental scientists to incorporate a detailed data reduction procedure, reduced data, and partial uncertainties in their publications, to the extent possible, which will be very useful in EXFOR compilation.

Original language | English |
---|---|

Pages (from-to) | 423-433 |

Number of pages | 11 |

Journal | Nuclear Science and Engineering |

Volume | 179 |

Issue number | 4 |

DOIs | |

Publication status | Published - 01-04-2015 |

### Fingerprint

### All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

- Nuclear Energy and Engineering

### Cite this

^{58}Ni(n,p)

^{58}Co relative to cross section for formation of 97Zr fission product in neutron-induced fission of

^{232}Th and

^{238}U at effective neutron energies E

_{n}= 5.89, 10.11, and 15.87 MeV.

*Nuclear Science and Engineering*,

*179*(4), 423-433. https://doi.org/10.13182/NSE14-19

}

^{58}Ni(n,p)

^{58}Co relative to cross section for formation of 97Zr fission product in neutron-induced fission of

^{232}Th and

^{238}U at effective neutron energies E

_{n}= 5.89, 10.11, and 15.87 MeV',

*Nuclear Science and Engineering*, vol. 179, no. 4, pp. 423-433. https://doi.org/10.13182/NSE14-19

**Measurement and covariance analysis of reaction cross sections for ^{58}Ni(n,p)^{58}Co relative to cross section for formation of 97Zr fission product in neutron-induced fission of ^{232}Th and ^{238}U at effective neutron energies E_{n} = 5.89, 10.11, and 15.87 MeV.** / Shivashankar, B. S.; Ganesan, Srinivasan; Naik, H.; Suryanarayana, S. V.; Sreekumaran Nair, N.; Manjunatha Prasad, K.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Measurement and covariance analysis of reaction cross sections for 58Ni(n,p)58Co relative to cross section for formation of 97Zr fission product in neutron-induced fission of 232Th and 238U at effective neutron energies En = 5.89, 10.11, and 15.87 MeV

AU - Shivashankar, B. S.

AU - Ganesan, Srinivasan

AU - Naik, H.

AU - Suryanarayana, S. V.

AU - Sreekumaran Nair, N.

AU - Manjunatha Prasad, K.

PY - 2015/4/1

Y1 - 2015/4/1

N2 - The 58Ni(n,p)58Co reaction cross sections have been measured relative to two monitors: The cross sections for the formation of the 97Zr fission product in neutron-induced fission of (a) 232Th and of(b) 238U. It is demonstrated how to generate and combine covariance matrices (using partial uncertainties and microcorrelations) in relative measurements at various stages like efficiency calibration of the high-purity germanium detector, using the ratio of58Ni(n,p)58Co reaction cross section relative to monitor cross section, and in the process of normalization. We further illustrate the weighted averaging of equivalent data as applicable in relative measurements. We provide the necessary data and the corresponding table of partial uncertainties as required for compilation in the EXchange-FORmat (EXFOR) database. This helps, in principle, anyone to generate and verify the steps in the calculation of the covariance matrices in the present work. We believe that it is important for all nuclear experimental scientists to incorporate a detailed data reduction procedure, reduced data, and partial uncertainties in their publications, to the extent possible, which will be very useful in EXFOR compilation.

AB - The 58Ni(n,p)58Co reaction cross sections have been measured relative to two monitors: The cross sections for the formation of the 97Zr fission product in neutron-induced fission of (a) 232Th and of(b) 238U. It is demonstrated how to generate and combine covariance matrices (using partial uncertainties and microcorrelations) in relative measurements at various stages like efficiency calibration of the high-purity germanium detector, using the ratio of58Ni(n,p)58Co reaction cross section relative to monitor cross section, and in the process of normalization. We further illustrate the weighted averaging of equivalent data as applicable in relative measurements. We provide the necessary data and the corresponding table of partial uncertainties as required for compilation in the EXchange-FORmat (EXFOR) database. This helps, in principle, anyone to generate and verify the steps in the calculation of the covariance matrices in the present work. We believe that it is important for all nuclear experimental scientists to incorporate a detailed data reduction procedure, reduced data, and partial uncertainties in their publications, to the extent possible, which will be very useful in EXFOR compilation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84930064930&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84930064930&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.13182/NSE14-19

DO - 10.13182/NSE14-19

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84930064930

VL - 179

SP - 423

EP - 433

JO - Nuclear Science and Engineering

JF - Nuclear Science and Engineering

SN - 0029-5639

IS - 4

ER -

^{58}Ni(n,p)

^{58}Co relative to cross section for formation of 97Zr fission product in neutron-induced fission of

^{232}Th and

^{238}U at effective neutron energies E

_{n}= 5.89, 10.11, and 15.87 MeV. Nuclear Science and Engineering. 2015 Apr 1;179(4):423-433. https://doi.org/10.13182/NSE14-19