Periodontal health status in pan chewers with or without the use of tobacco

Shivaswamy Sumanth, Khandige Mahalinga Bhat, Giliyar Subraya Bhat

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Betel nut and tobacco chewing is a common practice in south-east Asia. In India, betel nut is commonly chewed in the form of pan, with or without tobacco. Numerous studies have shown the carcinogenic potential of betel nut and tobacco. Betel nut and tobacco are also known to have deleterious effects on the oral tissues. Purpose: The aim of our study was to evaluate and compare the periodontal effects of pan chewing with or without the use of tobacco as an ingredient. Materials and Methods: The periodontal status of 300 subjects (150 subjects were pan chewers with tobacco and 150 subjects were pan chewers without tobacco) was evaluated using the community periodontal index (CPI). The subjects were selected by the stratified random sampling method. The oral hygiene status of the subjects was evaluated using the simplified oral hygiene index. Results: CPI code-4, with a probing depth of 6 mm or more, was seen in 30% of pan chewers with tobacco compared with 7.3% of pan chewers without tobacco. It was found that pan chewers with tobacco had 4.7 times more risk of having pockets than pan chewers without tobacco. The higher codes of loss of attachment were seen in pan chewers with tobacco compared with pan chewers without tobacco. It was found that pan chewers with tobacco had 7 times more risk of having loss of attachment when compared with the pan chewers without tobacco. Conclusions: The results show higher incidence of periodontal diseases in pan chewers who use tobacco compared with pan chewers who do not use tobacco. Based on the results, it was concluded that, although betel nut has deleterious effects on the periodontium, the addition of tobacco leads to a synergistic effect between betel nut and tobacco on the periodontal tissues.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)223-229
Number of pages7
JournalOral Health and Preventive Dentistry
Volume6
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01-01-2008

Fingerprint

Tobacco Use
Health Status
Tobacco
Areca
Periodontal Index
Oral Hygiene Index
Periodontium
Far East
Oral Hygiene
Mastication
Periodontal Diseases
India

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Sumanth, Shivaswamy ; Bhat, Khandige Mahalinga ; Bhat, Giliyar Subraya. / Periodontal health status in pan chewers with or without the use of tobacco. In: Oral Health and Preventive Dentistry. 2008 ; Vol. 6, No. 3. pp. 223-229.
@article{43bcdaf0128c4ef4ad382c0684245462,
title = "Periodontal health status in pan chewers with or without the use of tobacco",
abstract = "Background: Betel nut and tobacco chewing is a common practice in south-east Asia. In India, betel nut is commonly chewed in the form of pan, with or without tobacco. Numerous studies have shown the carcinogenic potential of betel nut and tobacco. Betel nut and tobacco are also known to have deleterious effects on the oral tissues. Purpose: The aim of our study was to evaluate and compare the periodontal effects of pan chewing with or without the use of tobacco as an ingredient. Materials and Methods: The periodontal status of 300 subjects (150 subjects were pan chewers with tobacco and 150 subjects were pan chewers without tobacco) was evaluated using the community periodontal index (CPI). The subjects were selected by the stratified random sampling method. The oral hygiene status of the subjects was evaluated using the simplified oral hygiene index. Results: CPI code-4, with a probing depth of 6 mm or more, was seen in 30{\%} of pan chewers with tobacco compared with 7.3{\%} of pan chewers without tobacco. It was found that pan chewers with tobacco had 4.7 times more risk of having pockets than pan chewers without tobacco. The higher codes of loss of attachment were seen in pan chewers with tobacco compared with pan chewers without tobacco. It was found that pan chewers with tobacco had 7 times more risk of having loss of attachment when compared with the pan chewers without tobacco. Conclusions: The results show higher incidence of periodontal diseases in pan chewers who use tobacco compared with pan chewers who do not use tobacco. Based on the results, it was concluded that, although betel nut has deleterious effects on the periodontium, the addition of tobacco leads to a synergistic effect between betel nut and tobacco on the periodontal tissues.",
author = "Shivaswamy Sumanth and Bhat, {Khandige Mahalinga} and Bhat, {Giliyar Subraya}",
year = "2008",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3290/j.ohpd.a13969",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "223--229",
journal = "Oral health & preventive dentistry",
issn = "1602-1622",
publisher = "Quintessence Publishing Company",
number = "3",

}

Periodontal health status in pan chewers with or without the use of tobacco. / Sumanth, Shivaswamy; Bhat, Khandige Mahalinga; Bhat, Giliyar Subraya.

In: Oral Health and Preventive Dentistry, Vol. 6, No. 3, 01.01.2008, p. 223-229.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Periodontal health status in pan chewers with or without the use of tobacco

AU - Sumanth, Shivaswamy

AU - Bhat, Khandige Mahalinga

AU - Bhat, Giliyar Subraya

PY - 2008/1/1

Y1 - 2008/1/1

N2 - Background: Betel nut and tobacco chewing is a common practice in south-east Asia. In India, betel nut is commonly chewed in the form of pan, with or without tobacco. Numerous studies have shown the carcinogenic potential of betel nut and tobacco. Betel nut and tobacco are also known to have deleterious effects on the oral tissues. Purpose: The aim of our study was to evaluate and compare the periodontal effects of pan chewing with or without the use of tobacco as an ingredient. Materials and Methods: The periodontal status of 300 subjects (150 subjects were pan chewers with tobacco and 150 subjects were pan chewers without tobacco) was evaluated using the community periodontal index (CPI). The subjects were selected by the stratified random sampling method. The oral hygiene status of the subjects was evaluated using the simplified oral hygiene index. Results: CPI code-4, with a probing depth of 6 mm or more, was seen in 30% of pan chewers with tobacco compared with 7.3% of pan chewers without tobacco. It was found that pan chewers with tobacco had 4.7 times more risk of having pockets than pan chewers without tobacco. The higher codes of loss of attachment were seen in pan chewers with tobacco compared with pan chewers without tobacco. It was found that pan chewers with tobacco had 7 times more risk of having loss of attachment when compared with the pan chewers without tobacco. Conclusions: The results show higher incidence of periodontal diseases in pan chewers who use tobacco compared with pan chewers who do not use tobacco. Based on the results, it was concluded that, although betel nut has deleterious effects on the periodontium, the addition of tobacco leads to a synergistic effect between betel nut and tobacco on the periodontal tissues.

AB - Background: Betel nut and tobacco chewing is a common practice in south-east Asia. In India, betel nut is commonly chewed in the form of pan, with or without tobacco. Numerous studies have shown the carcinogenic potential of betel nut and tobacco. Betel nut and tobacco are also known to have deleterious effects on the oral tissues. Purpose: The aim of our study was to evaluate and compare the periodontal effects of pan chewing with or without the use of tobacco as an ingredient. Materials and Methods: The periodontal status of 300 subjects (150 subjects were pan chewers with tobacco and 150 subjects were pan chewers without tobacco) was evaluated using the community periodontal index (CPI). The subjects were selected by the stratified random sampling method. The oral hygiene status of the subjects was evaluated using the simplified oral hygiene index. Results: CPI code-4, with a probing depth of 6 mm or more, was seen in 30% of pan chewers with tobacco compared with 7.3% of pan chewers without tobacco. It was found that pan chewers with tobacco had 4.7 times more risk of having pockets than pan chewers without tobacco. The higher codes of loss of attachment were seen in pan chewers with tobacco compared with pan chewers without tobacco. It was found that pan chewers with tobacco had 7 times more risk of having loss of attachment when compared with the pan chewers without tobacco. Conclusions: The results show higher incidence of periodontal diseases in pan chewers who use tobacco compared with pan chewers who do not use tobacco. Based on the results, it was concluded that, although betel nut has deleterious effects on the periodontium, the addition of tobacco leads to a synergistic effect between betel nut and tobacco on the periodontal tissues.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=60849139099&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=60849139099&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3290/j.ohpd.a13969

DO - 10.3290/j.ohpd.a13969

M3 - Article

VL - 6

SP - 223

EP - 229

JO - Oral health & preventive dentistry

JF - Oral health & preventive dentistry

SN - 1602-1622

IS - 3

ER -