Post operative analgesia with continuous epidural infusion

Rajeev Kumar, Athma Prasanna

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Forty eight ASA I or II patients of either sex between 20-70 years undergoing major upper abdominal surgery were grouped into sixteen each, on complaint of pain. They received an epidural bolus dose, followed by infusion of the assigned drug at 4ml per hour through BARD PCA I pump. Pain assessment, for the first four hours, was hourly, and subsequently at 10th, 16 th, 22nd, 28th, 36th and 40 th hour by VAS and VRS. The groups matched for demographic distribution. All groups had lower mean pain scores at first hour by VAS and VRS. In Group II and Group III, the difference was significant (<0.05) at the 2nd (VAS) and 4th (VRS) hours. From 16th (VAS) and 22nd (VRS) hours, the mean pain score was less and significant (<0.05) in Group III. In all groups sedation ranged from 0-1. There was hypotension in Group I (2/16).urinary retention in Group II (8/9 not catheterised); unilateral sensory impairment and motor weakness in Group I (3/16) and Group III (1/16). This study showed that continuous infusion of low dose morphine with bupivacaine provides better quality post operative analgesia with fewer side effects than bupivacaine or morphine alone.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)899-912
Number of pages14
JournalMiddle East Journal of Anesthesiology
Volume17
Issue number5
Publication statusPublished - 01-06-2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Analgesia
Bupivacaine
Pain
Morphine
Passive Cutaneous Anaphylaxis
Urinary Retention
Pain Measurement
Hypotension
Research Design
Demography
Pharmaceutical Preparations

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

Kumar, Rajeev ; Prasanna, Athma. / Post operative analgesia with continuous epidural infusion. In: Middle East Journal of Anesthesiology. 2004 ; Vol. 17, No. 5. pp. 899-912.
@article{e39bd2905e8c4e0c95363e986e324531,
title = "Post operative analgesia with continuous epidural infusion",
abstract = "Forty eight ASA I or II patients of either sex between 20-70 years undergoing major upper abdominal surgery were grouped into sixteen each, on complaint of pain. They received an epidural bolus dose, followed by infusion of the assigned drug at 4ml per hour through BARD PCA I pump. Pain assessment, for the first four hours, was hourly, and subsequently at 10th, 16 th, 22nd, 28th, 36th and 40 th hour by VAS and VRS. The groups matched for demographic distribution. All groups had lower mean pain scores at first hour by VAS and VRS. In Group II and Group III, the difference was significant (<0.05) at the 2nd (VAS) and 4th (VRS) hours. From 16th (VAS) and 22nd (VRS) hours, the mean pain score was less and significant (<0.05) in Group III. In all groups sedation ranged from 0-1. There was hypotension in Group I (2/16).urinary retention in Group II (8/9 not catheterised); unilateral sensory impairment and motor weakness in Group I (3/16) and Group III (1/16). This study showed that continuous infusion of low dose morphine with bupivacaine provides better quality post operative analgesia with fewer side effects than bupivacaine or morphine alone.",
author = "Rajeev Kumar and Athma Prasanna",
year = "2004",
month = "6",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "899--912",
journal = "Middle East Journal of Anesthesiology",
issn = "0544-0440",
publisher = "American University of Beirut",
number = "5",

}

Post operative analgesia with continuous epidural infusion. / Kumar, Rajeev; Prasanna, Athma.

In: Middle East Journal of Anesthesiology, Vol. 17, No. 5, 01.06.2004, p. 899-912.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Post operative analgesia with continuous epidural infusion

AU - Kumar, Rajeev

AU - Prasanna, Athma

PY - 2004/6/1

Y1 - 2004/6/1

N2 - Forty eight ASA I or II patients of either sex between 20-70 years undergoing major upper abdominal surgery were grouped into sixteen each, on complaint of pain. They received an epidural bolus dose, followed by infusion of the assigned drug at 4ml per hour through BARD PCA I pump. Pain assessment, for the first four hours, was hourly, and subsequently at 10th, 16 th, 22nd, 28th, 36th and 40 th hour by VAS and VRS. The groups matched for demographic distribution. All groups had lower mean pain scores at first hour by VAS and VRS. In Group II and Group III, the difference was significant (<0.05) at the 2nd (VAS) and 4th (VRS) hours. From 16th (VAS) and 22nd (VRS) hours, the mean pain score was less and significant (<0.05) in Group III. In all groups sedation ranged from 0-1. There was hypotension in Group I (2/16).urinary retention in Group II (8/9 not catheterised); unilateral sensory impairment and motor weakness in Group I (3/16) and Group III (1/16). This study showed that continuous infusion of low dose morphine with bupivacaine provides better quality post operative analgesia with fewer side effects than bupivacaine or morphine alone.

AB - Forty eight ASA I or II patients of either sex between 20-70 years undergoing major upper abdominal surgery were grouped into sixteen each, on complaint of pain. They received an epidural bolus dose, followed by infusion of the assigned drug at 4ml per hour through BARD PCA I pump. Pain assessment, for the first four hours, was hourly, and subsequently at 10th, 16 th, 22nd, 28th, 36th and 40 th hour by VAS and VRS. The groups matched for demographic distribution. All groups had lower mean pain scores at first hour by VAS and VRS. In Group II and Group III, the difference was significant (<0.05) at the 2nd (VAS) and 4th (VRS) hours. From 16th (VAS) and 22nd (VRS) hours, the mean pain score was less and significant (<0.05) in Group III. In all groups sedation ranged from 0-1. There was hypotension in Group I (2/16).urinary retention in Group II (8/9 not catheterised); unilateral sensory impairment and motor weakness in Group I (3/16) and Group III (1/16). This study showed that continuous infusion of low dose morphine with bupivacaine provides better quality post operative analgesia with fewer side effects than bupivacaine or morphine alone.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=4344686694&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=4344686694&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 17

SP - 899

EP - 912

JO - Middle East Journal of Anesthesiology

JF - Middle East Journal of Anesthesiology

SN - 0544-0440

IS - 5

ER -