Precision of dimensional measurements of mandible in different positions on orthopantomogram

Honey Arora, Vibha Jain, Keerthilatha Pai, Raman Kamboj

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the precision of dimensional measurements of the mandible in two different positions on orthopantomogram (OPG) (one with mandibular plane parallel to the floor and the other with Frankfort horizontal plane parallel to the floor) and determine the dimensional reliability. Materials and Methods: Anatomical landmarks were used to denote points for measurements on mandible as well as OPG and respective measurements made. Magnification was hence calculated and compared with magnification factor (1.2) listed by the manufacturer. Results: Vertical measurements and anterior horizontal and oblique measurements showed minimal magnification. Posterior horizontal and oblique measurements showed increased magnification. The difference in measurements in the two positions and on comparison with the one given by the manufacturer was statistically significant for posterior horizontal measurements but not for posterior oblique. Horizontal measurements crossing the midline were highly magnified and the difference was statistically significant for the two positions and on comparison to the one given by manufacturer. Conclusion: Magnification factor given by the manufacturer is not uniform in all locations and varies with changes in positioning and hence should not be relied upon when accurate measurements are to be made.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)48-51
Number of pages4
JournalIndian Journal of Dental Research
Volume24
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01-01-2013

Fingerprint

Mandible

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

@article{a3a3870c61bc4ee89ef41d55b7b17143,
title = "Precision of dimensional measurements of mandible in different positions on orthopantomogram",
abstract = "Objective: To evaluate the precision of dimensional measurements of the mandible in two different positions on orthopantomogram (OPG) (one with mandibular plane parallel to the floor and the other with Frankfort horizontal plane parallel to the floor) and determine the dimensional reliability. Materials and Methods: Anatomical landmarks were used to denote points for measurements on mandible as well as OPG and respective measurements made. Magnification was hence calculated and compared with magnification factor (1.2) listed by the manufacturer. Results: Vertical measurements and anterior horizontal and oblique measurements showed minimal magnification. Posterior horizontal and oblique measurements showed increased magnification. The difference in measurements in the two positions and on comparison with the one given by the manufacturer was statistically significant for posterior horizontal measurements but not for posterior oblique. Horizontal measurements crossing the midline were highly magnified and the difference was statistically significant for the two positions and on comparison to the one given by manufacturer. Conclusion: Magnification factor given by the manufacturer is not uniform in all locations and varies with changes in positioning and hence should not be relied upon when accurate measurements are to be made.",
author = "Honey Arora and Vibha Jain and Keerthilatha Pai and Raman Kamboj",
year = "2013",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.4103/0970-9290.114945",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "48--51",
journal = "Indian Journal of Dental Research",
issn = "0970-9290",
publisher = "Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd",
number = "1",

}

Precision of dimensional measurements of mandible in different positions on orthopantomogram. / Arora, Honey; Jain, Vibha; Pai, Keerthilatha; Kamboj, Raman.

In: Indian Journal of Dental Research, Vol. 24, No. 1, 01.01.2013, p. 48-51.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Precision of dimensional measurements of mandible in different positions on orthopantomogram

AU - Arora, Honey

AU - Jain, Vibha

AU - Pai, Keerthilatha

AU - Kamboj, Raman

PY - 2013/1/1

Y1 - 2013/1/1

N2 - Objective: To evaluate the precision of dimensional measurements of the mandible in two different positions on orthopantomogram (OPG) (one with mandibular plane parallel to the floor and the other with Frankfort horizontal plane parallel to the floor) and determine the dimensional reliability. Materials and Methods: Anatomical landmarks were used to denote points for measurements on mandible as well as OPG and respective measurements made. Magnification was hence calculated and compared with magnification factor (1.2) listed by the manufacturer. Results: Vertical measurements and anterior horizontal and oblique measurements showed minimal magnification. Posterior horizontal and oblique measurements showed increased magnification. The difference in measurements in the two positions and on comparison with the one given by the manufacturer was statistically significant for posterior horizontal measurements but not for posterior oblique. Horizontal measurements crossing the midline were highly magnified and the difference was statistically significant for the two positions and on comparison to the one given by manufacturer. Conclusion: Magnification factor given by the manufacturer is not uniform in all locations and varies with changes in positioning and hence should not be relied upon when accurate measurements are to be made.

AB - Objective: To evaluate the precision of dimensional measurements of the mandible in two different positions on orthopantomogram (OPG) (one with mandibular plane parallel to the floor and the other with Frankfort horizontal plane parallel to the floor) and determine the dimensional reliability. Materials and Methods: Anatomical landmarks were used to denote points for measurements on mandible as well as OPG and respective measurements made. Magnification was hence calculated and compared with magnification factor (1.2) listed by the manufacturer. Results: Vertical measurements and anterior horizontal and oblique measurements showed minimal magnification. Posterior horizontal and oblique measurements showed increased magnification. The difference in measurements in the two positions and on comparison with the one given by the manufacturer was statistically significant for posterior horizontal measurements but not for posterior oblique. Horizontal measurements crossing the midline were highly magnified and the difference was statistically significant for the two positions and on comparison to the one given by manufacturer. Conclusion: Magnification factor given by the manufacturer is not uniform in all locations and varies with changes in positioning and hence should not be relied upon when accurate measurements are to be made.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84883191654&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84883191654&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4103/0970-9290.114945

DO - 10.4103/0970-9290.114945

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 48

EP - 51

JO - Indian Journal of Dental Research

JF - Indian Journal of Dental Research

SN - 0970-9290

IS - 1

ER -