Prevalence of Primary Angle-Closure Disease in an Urban South Indian Population and Comparison with a Rural Population. The Chennai Glaucoma Study

Lingam Vijaya, Ronnie George, Hemamalini Arvind, M. Baskaran, S. Ve Ramesh, Prema Raju, Govindasamy Kumaramanickavel, Catherine McCarty

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

88 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To determine the prevalence of primary angle-closure glaucoma (PACG), primary angle closure (PAC), and PAC suspect (PACS) in an urban population, and to compare prevalence and associated risk factors with a rural population. Design: Population-based cross-sectional study. Participants: Four thousand eight hundred subjects 40 years or older were selected from Chennai city using multistage random cluster sampling. Intervention: All subjects had a complete ophthalmic examination that included logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution visual acuity, applanation tonometry, gonioscopy, grading of lens opacities, dilated fundus examination, optic disc photography, and visual fields. Main Outcome Measures: Glaucoma was diagnosed using the International Society of Geographical and Epidemiological Ophthalmology classification. Results: Three thousand eight hundred fifty (80.2%) responded; 34 subjects (17 female, 17 male) had PACG (0.88%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.60-1.16). The mean intraocular pressure (IOP) was 26.0±14.9 mmHg. Five subjects (14.7%) had been previously diagnosed to have glaucoma, 1 of whom had undergone glaucoma surgery and 2 of whom had been diagnosed to have open-angle glaucoma. Two subjects (5.9%) were bilaterally and 3 subjects (8.8%) were unilaterally blind. One hundred six subjects (2.75%; 95% CI, 2.01-3.49) were diagnosed to have PAC (62 female, 44 male). Thirty-nine subjects (36.8%) had presenting IOP > 24 mmHg, 83 (78.3%) had peripheral anterior synechiae, and 16 (15.1%) had both. Two hundred seventy-eight subjects (7.24%; 95% CI, 6.38-8.02) had PACS (183 female, 95 male). Prevalences of PACG and PACS were similar in the urban and rural populations. Primary angle closure prevalence was higher in the urban population (P<0.0001). Primary angle closure and PACG were positively associated with increasing age and IOP in both populations and were more common in rural women (odds ratio [OR], 4.3; 95% CI, 2.2-8.3). Association with hyperopia was seen only in the urban population (OR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.4-2.8). Conclusions: Prevalences of PACG and PACS were similar in the rural and urban populations; PAC was more common in the urban population. In both groups, the disease was asymptomatic. Poor detection rates were probably due to lack of gonioscopy as a routine part of an eye examination.

Original languageEnglish
JournalOphthalmology
Volume115
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01-04-2008

Fingerprint

Urban Population
Angle Closure Glaucoma
Rural Population
Glaucoma
Confidence Intervals
Intraocular Pressure
Gonioscopy
Population
Odds Ratio
Hyperopia
Asymptomatic Diseases
Open Angle Glaucoma
Photography
Optic Disk
Manometry
Ophthalmology
Visual Fields
Cataract
Visual Acuity
Cross-Sectional Studies

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

Vijaya, Lingam ; George, Ronnie ; Arvind, Hemamalini ; Baskaran, M. ; Ve Ramesh, S. ; Raju, Prema ; Kumaramanickavel, Govindasamy ; McCarty, Catherine. / Prevalence of Primary Angle-Closure Disease in an Urban South Indian Population and Comparison with a Rural Population. The Chennai Glaucoma Study. In: Ophthalmology. 2008 ; Vol. 115, No. 4.
@article{86f00565b63144a086dfefc4b04d5624,
title = "Prevalence of Primary Angle-Closure Disease in an Urban South Indian Population and Comparison with a Rural Population. The Chennai Glaucoma Study",
abstract = "Objective: To determine the prevalence of primary angle-closure glaucoma (PACG), primary angle closure (PAC), and PAC suspect (PACS) in an urban population, and to compare prevalence and associated risk factors with a rural population. Design: Population-based cross-sectional study. Participants: Four thousand eight hundred subjects 40 years or older were selected from Chennai city using multistage random cluster sampling. Intervention: All subjects had a complete ophthalmic examination that included logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution visual acuity, applanation tonometry, gonioscopy, grading of lens opacities, dilated fundus examination, optic disc photography, and visual fields. Main Outcome Measures: Glaucoma was diagnosed using the International Society of Geographical and Epidemiological Ophthalmology classification. Results: Three thousand eight hundred fifty (80.2{\%}) responded; 34 subjects (17 female, 17 male) had PACG (0.88{\%}; 95{\%} confidence interval [CI], 0.60-1.16). The mean intraocular pressure (IOP) was 26.0±14.9 mmHg. Five subjects (14.7{\%}) had been previously diagnosed to have glaucoma, 1 of whom had undergone glaucoma surgery and 2 of whom had been diagnosed to have open-angle glaucoma. Two subjects (5.9{\%}) were bilaterally and 3 subjects (8.8{\%}) were unilaterally blind. One hundred six subjects (2.75{\%}; 95{\%} CI, 2.01-3.49) were diagnosed to have PAC (62 female, 44 male). Thirty-nine subjects (36.8{\%}) had presenting IOP > 24 mmHg, 83 (78.3{\%}) had peripheral anterior synechiae, and 16 (15.1{\%}) had both. Two hundred seventy-eight subjects (7.24{\%}; 95{\%} CI, 6.38-8.02) had PACS (183 female, 95 male). Prevalences of PACG and PACS were similar in the urban and rural populations. Primary angle closure prevalence was higher in the urban population (P<0.0001). Primary angle closure and PACG were positively associated with increasing age and IOP in both populations and were more common in rural women (odds ratio [OR], 4.3; 95{\%} CI, 2.2-8.3). Association with hyperopia was seen only in the urban population (OR, 2.0; 95{\%} CI, 1.4-2.8). Conclusions: Prevalences of PACG and PACS were similar in the rural and urban populations; PAC was more common in the urban population. In both groups, the disease was asymptomatic. Poor detection rates were probably due to lack of gonioscopy as a routine part of an eye examination.",
author = "Lingam Vijaya and Ronnie George and Hemamalini Arvind and M. Baskaran and {Ve Ramesh}, S. and Prema Raju and Govindasamy Kumaramanickavel and Catherine McCarty",
year = "2008",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.05.034",
language = "English",
volume = "115",
journal = "Ophthalmology",
issn = "0161-6420",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "4",

}

Prevalence of Primary Angle-Closure Disease in an Urban South Indian Population and Comparison with a Rural Population. The Chennai Glaucoma Study. / Vijaya, Lingam; George, Ronnie; Arvind, Hemamalini; Baskaran, M.; Ve Ramesh, S.; Raju, Prema; Kumaramanickavel, Govindasamy; McCarty, Catherine.

In: Ophthalmology, Vol. 115, No. 4, 01.04.2008.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Prevalence of Primary Angle-Closure Disease in an Urban South Indian Population and Comparison with a Rural Population. The Chennai Glaucoma Study

AU - Vijaya, Lingam

AU - George, Ronnie

AU - Arvind, Hemamalini

AU - Baskaran, M.

AU - Ve Ramesh, S.

AU - Raju, Prema

AU - Kumaramanickavel, Govindasamy

AU - McCarty, Catherine

PY - 2008/4/1

Y1 - 2008/4/1

N2 - Objective: To determine the prevalence of primary angle-closure glaucoma (PACG), primary angle closure (PAC), and PAC suspect (PACS) in an urban population, and to compare prevalence and associated risk factors with a rural population. Design: Population-based cross-sectional study. Participants: Four thousand eight hundred subjects 40 years or older were selected from Chennai city using multistage random cluster sampling. Intervention: All subjects had a complete ophthalmic examination that included logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution visual acuity, applanation tonometry, gonioscopy, grading of lens opacities, dilated fundus examination, optic disc photography, and visual fields. Main Outcome Measures: Glaucoma was diagnosed using the International Society of Geographical and Epidemiological Ophthalmology classification. Results: Three thousand eight hundred fifty (80.2%) responded; 34 subjects (17 female, 17 male) had PACG (0.88%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.60-1.16). The mean intraocular pressure (IOP) was 26.0±14.9 mmHg. Five subjects (14.7%) had been previously diagnosed to have glaucoma, 1 of whom had undergone glaucoma surgery and 2 of whom had been diagnosed to have open-angle glaucoma. Two subjects (5.9%) were bilaterally and 3 subjects (8.8%) were unilaterally blind. One hundred six subjects (2.75%; 95% CI, 2.01-3.49) were diagnosed to have PAC (62 female, 44 male). Thirty-nine subjects (36.8%) had presenting IOP > 24 mmHg, 83 (78.3%) had peripheral anterior synechiae, and 16 (15.1%) had both. Two hundred seventy-eight subjects (7.24%; 95% CI, 6.38-8.02) had PACS (183 female, 95 male). Prevalences of PACG and PACS were similar in the urban and rural populations. Primary angle closure prevalence was higher in the urban population (P<0.0001). Primary angle closure and PACG were positively associated with increasing age and IOP in both populations and were more common in rural women (odds ratio [OR], 4.3; 95% CI, 2.2-8.3). Association with hyperopia was seen only in the urban population (OR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.4-2.8). Conclusions: Prevalences of PACG and PACS were similar in the rural and urban populations; PAC was more common in the urban population. In both groups, the disease was asymptomatic. Poor detection rates were probably due to lack of gonioscopy as a routine part of an eye examination.

AB - Objective: To determine the prevalence of primary angle-closure glaucoma (PACG), primary angle closure (PAC), and PAC suspect (PACS) in an urban population, and to compare prevalence and associated risk factors with a rural population. Design: Population-based cross-sectional study. Participants: Four thousand eight hundred subjects 40 years or older were selected from Chennai city using multistage random cluster sampling. Intervention: All subjects had a complete ophthalmic examination that included logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution visual acuity, applanation tonometry, gonioscopy, grading of lens opacities, dilated fundus examination, optic disc photography, and visual fields. Main Outcome Measures: Glaucoma was diagnosed using the International Society of Geographical and Epidemiological Ophthalmology classification. Results: Three thousand eight hundred fifty (80.2%) responded; 34 subjects (17 female, 17 male) had PACG (0.88%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.60-1.16). The mean intraocular pressure (IOP) was 26.0±14.9 mmHg. Five subjects (14.7%) had been previously diagnosed to have glaucoma, 1 of whom had undergone glaucoma surgery and 2 of whom had been diagnosed to have open-angle glaucoma. Two subjects (5.9%) were bilaterally and 3 subjects (8.8%) were unilaterally blind. One hundred six subjects (2.75%; 95% CI, 2.01-3.49) were diagnosed to have PAC (62 female, 44 male). Thirty-nine subjects (36.8%) had presenting IOP > 24 mmHg, 83 (78.3%) had peripheral anterior synechiae, and 16 (15.1%) had both. Two hundred seventy-eight subjects (7.24%; 95% CI, 6.38-8.02) had PACS (183 female, 95 male). Prevalences of PACG and PACS were similar in the urban and rural populations. Primary angle closure prevalence was higher in the urban population (P<0.0001). Primary angle closure and PACG were positively associated with increasing age and IOP in both populations and were more common in rural women (odds ratio [OR], 4.3; 95% CI, 2.2-8.3). Association with hyperopia was seen only in the urban population (OR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.4-2.8). Conclusions: Prevalences of PACG and PACS were similar in the rural and urban populations; PAC was more common in the urban population. In both groups, the disease was asymptomatic. Poor detection rates were probably due to lack of gonioscopy as a routine part of an eye examination.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=41149106022&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=41149106022&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.05.034

DO - 10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.05.034

M3 - Article

C2 - 17869343

AN - SCOPUS:41149106022

VL - 115

JO - Ophthalmology

JF - Ophthalmology

SN - 0161-6420

IS - 4

ER -