TY - JOUR
T1 - Quality of life after coronary artery bypass graft & percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty
T2 - A follow up study from India
AU - Singh, Sharda
AU - Sinha, Vinod
AU - Singh, Shashikala
AU - Kapoor, Lalit
AU - Praharaj, Samir
AU - Tikka, Sai
AU - Singh, Lokesh Kumar
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications. All rights reserved.
Copyright:
Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2020/10
Y1 - 2020/10
N2 - Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) are treatments of choice for coronary artery disease. Quality of life (QoL) is an important factor in determining optimum treatment. This study was aimed to compare changes in QoL, six months post procedure, between CABG and PTCA, and to understand the confounding effect of various contributing factors. Thirty stable angina patients each in CABG and PTCA groups, were followed up for six months. QoL was assessed with WHO-QoL-BREF. Depression was rated on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale. Changes in QoL and depression within and between CABG and PTCA groups were compared. Multinomial logistic regression was used to measure the predictive strength of treatment type (CABG and PTCA) on QoL, controlling for significant confounders. Although scores of QoL and depression significantly changed over time in both the groups, time×group interaction did not reach to a significance. Significant confounding effects of diabetes (P<0.01), hypertension (P<0.05) and diet restriction (P<0.05) were found. Controlling for confounding effects of these factors, group distribution to PTCA, compared to CABG, significantly predicted greater improvements in QoL (P<0.01).
AB - Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) are treatments of choice for coronary artery disease. Quality of life (QoL) is an important factor in determining optimum treatment. This study was aimed to compare changes in QoL, six months post procedure, between CABG and PTCA, and to understand the confounding effect of various contributing factors. Thirty stable angina patients each in CABG and PTCA groups, were followed up for six months. QoL was assessed with WHO-QoL-BREF. Depression was rated on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale. Changes in QoL and depression within and between CABG and PTCA groups were compared. Multinomial logistic regression was used to measure the predictive strength of treatment type (CABG and PTCA) on QoL, controlling for significant confounders. Although scores of QoL and depression significantly changed over time in both the groups, time×group interaction did not reach to a significance. Significant confounding effects of diabetes (P<0.01), hypertension (P<0.05) and diet restriction (P<0.05) were found. Controlling for confounding effects of these factors, group distribution to PTCA, compared to CABG, significantly predicted greater improvements in QoL (P<0.01).
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85099032654&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85099032654&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_1310_18
DO - 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_1310_18
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85099032654
SN - 0971-5916
VL - 152
SP - 423
EP - 426
JO - Indian Journal of Medical Research
JF - Indian Journal of Medical Research
IS - 4
ER -