Reduction techniques in the management of atlantoaxial subluxation

Arjun Shetty, Anil Kumar, Arjun Chacko, Sachin Guthe, Abhishek R. Kini

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The traditional approach to atlantoaxial subluxation which is irreducible after traction is transoral decompression and reduction or odontoid excision and posterior fixation. Transoral approach is associated with comorbidities. However using a posterior approach a combination of atlantoaxial joint space release and a variety of manipulation procedures, optimal or near optimal reduction can be achieved. We analysed our results in this study based on above procedure. Materials and Methods: 66 cases treated over a 5 year period were evaluated retrospectively. Three cases treated by occipito cervical fusion were not included in the study. The remaining 63 cases were classified into three types. All except two cases were subjected to primary posterior C1-C2 joint space dissection and release followed by on table manipulation which was tailored to treat the type of atlantoaxial subluxation. Optimal or near optimal reduction was possible in all cases. An anterior transoral decompression was needed only in two cases where a bony growth (callus) between the C1 anterior arch and the odontoid precluded reduction by posterior manipulation. All cases then underwent posterior fusion and fixation procedures. Patients were neurologically and radiologically evaluated at regular followups to assess fusion and stability for a minimum period of 6 months. Results: Of the 63 cases who underwent posterior manipulation, 49 cases achieved optimum reduction and the remaining 14 cases showed near optimal reduction. Two cases expired in the postoperative period. None of the remaining cases showed neurological worsening after the procedure. Evaluation at 6 months after surgery revealed good stability and fusion in all except three cases.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)333-339
Number of pages7
JournalIndian Journal of Orthopaedics
Volume47
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01-07-2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Decompression
Atlanto-Axial Joint
Bony Callus
Traction
Postoperative Period
Dissection
Comorbidity
Joints
Growth

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Shetty, Arjun ; Kumar, Anil ; Chacko, Arjun ; Guthe, Sachin ; Kini, Abhishek R. / Reduction techniques in the management of atlantoaxial subluxation. In: Indian Journal of Orthopaedics. 2013 ; Vol. 47, No. 4. pp. 333-339.
@article{dbf81b0f29494486b38e004f435cf09e,
title = "Reduction techniques in the management of atlantoaxial subluxation",
abstract = "Background: The traditional approach to atlantoaxial subluxation which is irreducible after traction is transoral decompression and reduction or odontoid excision and posterior fixation. Transoral approach is associated with comorbidities. However using a posterior approach a combination of atlantoaxial joint space release and a variety of manipulation procedures, optimal or near optimal reduction can be achieved. We analysed our results in this study based on above procedure. Materials and Methods: 66 cases treated over a 5 year period were evaluated retrospectively. Three cases treated by occipito cervical fusion were not included in the study. The remaining 63 cases were classified into three types. All except two cases were subjected to primary posterior C1-C2 joint space dissection and release followed by on table manipulation which was tailored to treat the type of atlantoaxial subluxation. Optimal or near optimal reduction was possible in all cases. An anterior transoral decompression was needed only in two cases where a bony growth (callus) between the C1 anterior arch and the odontoid precluded reduction by posterior manipulation. All cases then underwent posterior fusion and fixation procedures. Patients were neurologically and radiologically evaluated at regular followups to assess fusion and stability for a minimum period of 6 months. Results: Of the 63 cases who underwent posterior manipulation, 49 cases achieved optimum reduction and the remaining 14 cases showed near optimal reduction. Two cases expired in the postoperative period. None of the remaining cases showed neurological worsening after the procedure. Evaluation at 6 months after surgery revealed good stability and fusion in all except three cases.",
author = "Arjun Shetty and Anil Kumar and Arjun Chacko and Sachin Guthe and Kini, {Abhishek R.}",
year = "2013",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.4103/0019-5413.114908",
language = "English",
volume = "47",
pages = "333--339",
journal = "Indian Journal of Orthopaedics",
issn = "0019-5413",
publisher = "Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd",
number = "4",

}

Shetty, A, Kumar, A, Chacko, A, Guthe, S & Kini, AR 2013, 'Reduction techniques in the management of atlantoaxial subluxation', Indian Journal of Orthopaedics, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 333-339. https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.114908

Reduction techniques in the management of atlantoaxial subluxation. / Shetty, Arjun; Kumar, Anil; Chacko, Arjun; Guthe, Sachin; Kini, Abhishek R.

In: Indian Journal of Orthopaedics, Vol. 47, No. 4, 01.07.2013, p. 333-339.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reduction techniques in the management of atlantoaxial subluxation

AU - Shetty, Arjun

AU - Kumar, Anil

AU - Chacko, Arjun

AU - Guthe, Sachin

AU - Kini, Abhishek R.

PY - 2013/7/1

Y1 - 2013/7/1

N2 - Background: The traditional approach to atlantoaxial subluxation which is irreducible after traction is transoral decompression and reduction or odontoid excision and posterior fixation. Transoral approach is associated with comorbidities. However using a posterior approach a combination of atlantoaxial joint space release and a variety of manipulation procedures, optimal or near optimal reduction can be achieved. We analysed our results in this study based on above procedure. Materials and Methods: 66 cases treated over a 5 year period were evaluated retrospectively. Three cases treated by occipito cervical fusion were not included in the study. The remaining 63 cases were classified into three types. All except two cases were subjected to primary posterior C1-C2 joint space dissection and release followed by on table manipulation which was tailored to treat the type of atlantoaxial subluxation. Optimal or near optimal reduction was possible in all cases. An anterior transoral decompression was needed only in two cases where a bony growth (callus) between the C1 anterior arch and the odontoid precluded reduction by posterior manipulation. All cases then underwent posterior fusion and fixation procedures. Patients were neurologically and radiologically evaluated at regular followups to assess fusion and stability for a minimum period of 6 months. Results: Of the 63 cases who underwent posterior manipulation, 49 cases achieved optimum reduction and the remaining 14 cases showed near optimal reduction. Two cases expired in the postoperative period. None of the remaining cases showed neurological worsening after the procedure. Evaluation at 6 months after surgery revealed good stability and fusion in all except three cases.

AB - Background: The traditional approach to atlantoaxial subluxation which is irreducible after traction is transoral decompression and reduction or odontoid excision and posterior fixation. Transoral approach is associated with comorbidities. However using a posterior approach a combination of atlantoaxial joint space release and a variety of manipulation procedures, optimal or near optimal reduction can be achieved. We analysed our results in this study based on above procedure. Materials and Methods: 66 cases treated over a 5 year period were evaluated retrospectively. Three cases treated by occipito cervical fusion were not included in the study. The remaining 63 cases were classified into three types. All except two cases were subjected to primary posterior C1-C2 joint space dissection and release followed by on table manipulation which was tailored to treat the type of atlantoaxial subluxation. Optimal or near optimal reduction was possible in all cases. An anterior transoral decompression was needed only in two cases where a bony growth (callus) between the C1 anterior arch and the odontoid precluded reduction by posterior manipulation. All cases then underwent posterior fusion and fixation procedures. Patients were neurologically and radiologically evaluated at regular followups to assess fusion and stability for a minimum period of 6 months. Results: Of the 63 cases who underwent posterior manipulation, 49 cases achieved optimum reduction and the remaining 14 cases showed near optimal reduction. Two cases expired in the postoperative period. None of the remaining cases showed neurological worsening after the procedure. Evaluation at 6 months after surgery revealed good stability and fusion in all except three cases.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84893937179&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84893937179&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4103/0019-5413.114908

DO - 10.4103/0019-5413.114908

M3 - Article

VL - 47

SP - 333

EP - 339

JO - Indian Journal of Orthopaedics

JF - Indian Journal of Orthopaedics

SN - 0019-5413

IS - 4

ER -