Reliability of a modified logMAR distant visual acuity chart for routine clinical use

Babu Noushad, Jyothi Thomas, Shristi V. Amin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background/Aim: Acuity charts that follow the principle of logarithmic size progression (logMAR charts) are considered to be the gold standard for the assessment of distant vision. But it is not well accepted for routine eye examinations due to increased testing time and the complexity of scoring. This study was designed to check whether a modified logMAR chart with three optotypes would provide a reliable acuity assessment compared to standard logMAR charts for routine eye examination. Materials and Methods: Two versions of modified and standard logMAR charts were designed, constructed, and used to assess the visual acuity of 50 individuals drawn from a typical out-patient population. Timed test-retest variability and limit of agreement (95% confidence limit of agreement) of the modified chart are compared to the standard logMAR chart using Bland-Altman method. A comparison of the testing time was carried out using paired t-test. Results: The test-retest variability of the charts was comparable, with 95% confidence limit of the mean difference being ±0.08 for standard logMAR and ±0.10 for modified logMAR. Both the versions of modified logMAR charts produced the results which agreed well with those of the standard logMAR charts. The mean testing time required to complete the acuity measurements with the modified chart was significantly lesser compared to the standard chart (P < 0.001). Conclusion: The outcomes of the current study demonstrates that the modified logMAR chart with three optotypes offers a comparable result to the standard logMAR charts for assessing distant visual acuity in routine clinical examination set up with a much lesser testing time.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)87-90
Number of pages4
JournalOman Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume5
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01-06-2012

Fingerprint

Visual Acuity
Outpatients
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Population

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

@article{0cfd609939c4457184455d9505ee207a,
title = "Reliability of a modified logMAR distant visual acuity chart for routine clinical use",
abstract = "Background/Aim: Acuity charts that follow the principle of logarithmic size progression (logMAR charts) are considered to be the gold standard for the assessment of distant vision. But it is not well accepted for routine eye examinations due to increased testing time and the complexity of scoring. This study was designed to check whether a modified logMAR chart with three optotypes would provide a reliable acuity assessment compared to standard logMAR charts for routine eye examination. Materials and Methods: Two versions of modified and standard logMAR charts were designed, constructed, and used to assess the visual acuity of 50 individuals drawn from a typical out-patient population. Timed test-retest variability and limit of agreement (95{\%} confidence limit of agreement) of the modified chart are compared to the standard logMAR chart using Bland-Altman method. A comparison of the testing time was carried out using paired t-test. Results: The test-retest variability of the charts was comparable, with 95{\%} confidence limit of the mean difference being ±0.08 for standard logMAR and ±0.10 for modified logMAR. Both the versions of modified logMAR charts produced the results which agreed well with those of the standard logMAR charts. The mean testing time required to complete the acuity measurements with the modified chart was significantly lesser compared to the standard chart (P < 0.001). Conclusion: The outcomes of the current study demonstrates that the modified logMAR chart with three optotypes offers a comparable result to the standard logMAR charts for assessing distant visual acuity in routine clinical examination set up with a much lesser testing time.",
author = "Babu Noushad and Jyothi Thomas and Amin, {Shristi V.}",
year = "2012",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.4103/0974-620X.99370",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
pages = "87--90",
journal = "Oman Journal of Ophthalmology",
issn = "0974-620X",
publisher = "Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd",
number = "2",

}

Reliability of a modified logMAR distant visual acuity chart for routine clinical use. / Noushad, Babu; Thomas, Jyothi; Amin, Shristi V.

In: Oman Journal of Ophthalmology, Vol. 5, No. 2, 01.06.2012, p. 87-90.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reliability of a modified logMAR distant visual acuity chart for routine clinical use

AU - Noushad, Babu

AU - Thomas, Jyothi

AU - Amin, Shristi V.

PY - 2012/6/1

Y1 - 2012/6/1

N2 - Background/Aim: Acuity charts that follow the principle of logarithmic size progression (logMAR charts) are considered to be the gold standard for the assessment of distant vision. But it is not well accepted for routine eye examinations due to increased testing time and the complexity of scoring. This study was designed to check whether a modified logMAR chart with three optotypes would provide a reliable acuity assessment compared to standard logMAR charts for routine eye examination. Materials and Methods: Two versions of modified and standard logMAR charts were designed, constructed, and used to assess the visual acuity of 50 individuals drawn from a typical out-patient population. Timed test-retest variability and limit of agreement (95% confidence limit of agreement) of the modified chart are compared to the standard logMAR chart using Bland-Altman method. A comparison of the testing time was carried out using paired t-test. Results: The test-retest variability of the charts was comparable, with 95% confidence limit of the mean difference being ±0.08 for standard logMAR and ±0.10 for modified logMAR. Both the versions of modified logMAR charts produced the results which agreed well with those of the standard logMAR charts. The mean testing time required to complete the acuity measurements with the modified chart was significantly lesser compared to the standard chart (P < 0.001). Conclusion: The outcomes of the current study demonstrates that the modified logMAR chart with three optotypes offers a comparable result to the standard logMAR charts for assessing distant visual acuity in routine clinical examination set up with a much lesser testing time.

AB - Background/Aim: Acuity charts that follow the principle of logarithmic size progression (logMAR charts) are considered to be the gold standard for the assessment of distant vision. But it is not well accepted for routine eye examinations due to increased testing time and the complexity of scoring. This study was designed to check whether a modified logMAR chart with three optotypes would provide a reliable acuity assessment compared to standard logMAR charts for routine eye examination. Materials and Methods: Two versions of modified and standard logMAR charts were designed, constructed, and used to assess the visual acuity of 50 individuals drawn from a typical out-patient population. Timed test-retest variability and limit of agreement (95% confidence limit of agreement) of the modified chart are compared to the standard logMAR chart using Bland-Altman method. A comparison of the testing time was carried out using paired t-test. Results: The test-retest variability of the charts was comparable, with 95% confidence limit of the mean difference being ±0.08 for standard logMAR and ±0.10 for modified logMAR. Both the versions of modified logMAR charts produced the results which agreed well with those of the standard logMAR charts. The mean testing time required to complete the acuity measurements with the modified chart was significantly lesser compared to the standard chart (P < 0.001). Conclusion: The outcomes of the current study demonstrates that the modified logMAR chart with three optotypes offers a comparable result to the standard logMAR charts for assessing distant visual acuity in routine clinical examination set up with a much lesser testing time.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84865588159&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84865588159&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4103/0974-620X.99370

DO - 10.4103/0974-620X.99370

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84865588159

VL - 5

SP - 87

EP - 90

JO - Oman Journal of Ophthalmology

JF - Oman Journal of Ophthalmology

SN - 0974-620X

IS - 2

ER -