Repeat film analysis and its implications for quality assurance in dental radiology

An institutional case study

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Context: The goal of any radiologist is to produce the highest quality diagnostic radiographs, while keeping patient exposure as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA). Aims: The aim of this study was to describe the reasons for radiograph rejections through a repeat film analysis in an Indian dental school. Settings and Design: An observational study conducted in the Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Manipal. Materials and Methods: During a 6-month study period, a total of 9,495 intra-oral radiographs and 2339 extraoral radiographs taken in the Radiology Department were subjected to repeat film analysis. Statistical Analysis Used: SPSS Version 16. Descriptive analysis used. Results: The results showed that the repeat rates were 7.1% and 5.86% for intraoral and extraoral radiographs, respectively. Among the causes for errors reported, positioning error (38.7%) was the most common, followed by improper angulations (26.1%), and improper film placement (11.2%) for intra-oral radiographs. The study found that the maximum frequency of repeats among extraoral radiographs was for panoramic radiographs (49%) followed by lateral cephalogram (33%), and paranasal sinus view (14%). It was also observed that repeat rate of intraoral radiographs was highest for internees (44.7%), and undergraduate students (28.2%). Conclusions: The study pointed to a need for more targeted interventions to achieve the goal of keeping patient exposure ALARA in a dental school setting.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)392-395
Number of pages4
JournalContemporary Clinical Dentistry
Volume6
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01-01-2015

Fingerprint

Dental Schools
Radiology
Tooth
Oral Medicine
Paranasal Sinuses
Observational Studies
Students
Radiologists

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Orthodontics
  • Oral Surgery
  • Periodontics

Cite this

@article{e9737e00354d47f9a08fc9d75dcbe1a1,
title = "Repeat film analysis and its implications for quality assurance in dental radiology: An institutional case study",
abstract = "Context: The goal of any radiologist is to produce the highest quality diagnostic radiographs, while keeping patient exposure as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA). Aims: The aim of this study was to describe the reasons for radiograph rejections through a repeat film analysis in an Indian dental school. Settings and Design: An observational study conducted in the Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Manipal. Materials and Methods: During a 6-month study period, a total of 9,495 intra-oral radiographs and 2339 extraoral radiographs taken in the Radiology Department were subjected to repeat film analysis. Statistical Analysis Used: SPSS Version 16. Descriptive analysis used. Results: The results showed that the repeat rates were 7.1{\%} and 5.86{\%} for intraoral and extraoral radiographs, respectively. Among the causes for errors reported, positioning error (38.7{\%}) was the most common, followed by improper angulations (26.1{\%}), and improper film placement (11.2{\%}) for intra-oral radiographs. The study found that the maximum frequency of repeats among extraoral radiographs was for panoramic radiographs (49{\%}) followed by lateral cephalogram (33{\%}), and paranasal sinus view (14{\%}). It was also observed that repeat rate of intraoral radiographs was highest for internees (44.7{\%}), and undergraduate students (28.2{\%}). Conclusions: The study pointed to a need for more targeted interventions to achieve the goal of keeping patient exposure ALARA in a dental school setting.",
author = "Shruthi Acharya and Keerthilatha Pai and Shashidhar Acharya",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.4103/0976-237X.161898",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "392--395",
journal = "Contemporary Clinical Dentistry",
issn = "0976-237X",
publisher = "Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Repeat film analysis and its implications for quality assurance in dental radiology

T2 - An institutional case study

AU - Acharya, Shruthi

AU - Pai, Keerthilatha

AU - Acharya, Shashidhar

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Context: The goal of any radiologist is to produce the highest quality diagnostic radiographs, while keeping patient exposure as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA). Aims: The aim of this study was to describe the reasons for radiograph rejections through a repeat film analysis in an Indian dental school. Settings and Design: An observational study conducted in the Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Manipal. Materials and Methods: During a 6-month study period, a total of 9,495 intra-oral radiographs and 2339 extraoral radiographs taken in the Radiology Department were subjected to repeat film analysis. Statistical Analysis Used: SPSS Version 16. Descriptive analysis used. Results: The results showed that the repeat rates were 7.1% and 5.86% for intraoral and extraoral radiographs, respectively. Among the causes for errors reported, positioning error (38.7%) was the most common, followed by improper angulations (26.1%), and improper film placement (11.2%) for intra-oral radiographs. The study found that the maximum frequency of repeats among extraoral radiographs was for panoramic radiographs (49%) followed by lateral cephalogram (33%), and paranasal sinus view (14%). It was also observed that repeat rate of intraoral radiographs was highest for internees (44.7%), and undergraduate students (28.2%). Conclusions: The study pointed to a need for more targeted interventions to achieve the goal of keeping patient exposure ALARA in a dental school setting.

AB - Context: The goal of any radiologist is to produce the highest quality diagnostic radiographs, while keeping patient exposure as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA). Aims: The aim of this study was to describe the reasons for radiograph rejections through a repeat film analysis in an Indian dental school. Settings and Design: An observational study conducted in the Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Manipal. Materials and Methods: During a 6-month study period, a total of 9,495 intra-oral radiographs and 2339 extraoral radiographs taken in the Radiology Department were subjected to repeat film analysis. Statistical Analysis Used: SPSS Version 16. Descriptive analysis used. Results: The results showed that the repeat rates were 7.1% and 5.86% for intraoral and extraoral radiographs, respectively. Among the causes for errors reported, positioning error (38.7%) was the most common, followed by improper angulations (26.1%), and improper film placement (11.2%) for intra-oral radiographs. The study found that the maximum frequency of repeats among extraoral radiographs was for panoramic radiographs (49%) followed by lateral cephalogram (33%), and paranasal sinus view (14%). It was also observed that repeat rate of intraoral radiographs was highest for internees (44.7%), and undergraduate students (28.2%). Conclusions: The study pointed to a need for more targeted interventions to achieve the goal of keeping patient exposure ALARA in a dental school setting.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84938517542&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84938517542&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4103/0976-237X.161898

DO - 10.4103/0976-237X.161898

M3 - Article

VL - 6

SP - 392

EP - 395

JO - Contemporary Clinical Dentistry

JF - Contemporary Clinical Dentistry

SN - 0976-237X

IS - 3

ER -