Replacement of missing anterior tooth using screw retained implant prosthesis in the esthetic zone: A case report with 3 years of follow up

Manawar Ahmad, B. Dhanasekar, I. N. Aparna, Hina Naim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)


As more and more dental practitioners are focusing on implant-supported fixed restorations, some clinicians favor the use of cement retained restorations while others consider screw-retained prosthesis to be the best choice. As both types of prostheses have certain advantages and disadvantages, clinicians should be aware of the limitations of each type. Screw-retained implant restorations have an advantage of predictable retention, retrievability and lack of potentially retained sub-gingival cement. However, a few disadvantages exist such as precise placement of the implant for optimal and esthetic location of the screw access hole and obtaining passive fit. On the other hand, cement retained restorations eliminates unaesthetic screw access holes; have passive fit of castings; reduce stress to splinted implants because of minor misfit of the framework; reduced complexity of lab procedures; enhanced esthetics; reduced cost factors and non disrupted morphology of the occlusal table. This case report presents the replacement of missing left central incisor using screwretained implant prosthesis due to palatal trajectory of the implant placement and inadequate abutment height for retention of cement retained prosthesis.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)297-300
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Indian Prosthodontist Society
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 01-09-2014


All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Oral Surgery
  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this