Retention of moisture-tolerant and conventional resin-based sealant in six- to nine-year-old children

Sachin G. Khatri, Srinivasan Raj Samuel, Shashidhar Acharya, Snehal Patil, Kavita Madan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the retention rates and development of caries in permanent molars in children sealed with moisture-tolerant, resin-based (Embrace WetBond), and conventional resin-based (Helioseal) sealant over a period of one year. Methods: This was a double blind, split-mouth, randomized controlled trial among six- to nine-year-olds. Sixty-eight permanent mandibular first molars in 34 children were randomly assigned to be sealed with Embrace WetBond or Helioseal sealant. Results: The final sample was 32 children with 64 teeth. At 12 months, 23 of 32 (72 percent) sealants were completely retained in Embrace WetBond, whereas only 16 of 32 (50 percent) were retained in the Helioseal group. There was a statistically significant difference in retention rates of Embrace WetBond and Helioseal sealants at 12 months (P<.05). At 12 months follow-up, only two teeth developed caries in Embrace WetBond; in the Helioseal group, five teeth developed caries (two initial and three enamel caries). Conclusions: Embrace WetBond was superior to Helioseal sealant, as Embrace exhibited higher retention and lower caries scores. Embrace WetBond can be preferred over conventional resin-based sealants for community and outreach sealant programs where use of rubber dam for moisture control is difficult to practice.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)366-370
Number of pages5
JournalPediatric Dentistry
Volume37
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 01-07-2015

Fingerprint

Tooth
Rubber Dams
Community-Institutional Relations
Dental Enamel
Embrace WetBond
Mouth
Helioseal
Randomized Controlled Trials

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

Khatri, Sachin G. ; Samuel, Srinivasan Raj ; Acharya, Shashidhar ; Patil, Snehal ; Madan, Kavita. / Retention of moisture-tolerant and conventional resin-based sealant in six- to nine-year-old children. In: Pediatric Dentistry. 2015 ; Vol. 37, No. 4. pp. 366-370.
@article{f6068dfe326044ffbb40e6e971ef790a,
title = "Retention of moisture-tolerant and conventional resin-based sealant in six- to nine-year-old children",
abstract = "Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the retention rates and development of caries in permanent molars in children sealed with moisture-tolerant, resin-based (Embrace WetBond), and conventional resin-based (Helioseal) sealant over a period of one year. Methods: This was a double blind, split-mouth, randomized controlled trial among six- to nine-year-olds. Sixty-eight permanent mandibular first molars in 34 children were randomly assigned to be sealed with Embrace WetBond or Helioseal sealant. Results: The final sample was 32 children with 64 teeth. At 12 months, 23 of 32 (72 percent) sealants were completely retained in Embrace WetBond, whereas only 16 of 32 (50 percent) were retained in the Helioseal group. There was a statistically significant difference in retention rates of Embrace WetBond and Helioseal sealants at 12 months (P<.05). At 12 months follow-up, only two teeth developed caries in Embrace WetBond; in the Helioseal group, five teeth developed caries (two initial and three enamel caries). Conclusions: Embrace WetBond was superior to Helioseal sealant, as Embrace exhibited higher retention and lower caries scores. Embrace WetBond can be preferred over conventional resin-based sealants for community and outreach sealant programs where use of rubber dam for moisture control is difficult to practice.",
author = "Khatri, {Sachin G.} and Samuel, {Srinivasan Raj} and Shashidhar Acharya and Snehal Patil and Kavita Madan",
year = "2015",
month = "7",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
pages = "366--370",
journal = "Pediatric Dentistry",
issn = "0164-1263",
publisher = "American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry",
number = "4",

}

Retention of moisture-tolerant and conventional resin-based sealant in six- to nine-year-old children. / Khatri, Sachin G.; Samuel, Srinivasan Raj; Acharya, Shashidhar; Patil, Snehal; Madan, Kavita.

In: Pediatric Dentistry, Vol. 37, No. 4, 01.07.2015, p. 366-370.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Retention of moisture-tolerant and conventional resin-based sealant in six- to nine-year-old children

AU - Khatri, Sachin G.

AU - Samuel, Srinivasan Raj

AU - Acharya, Shashidhar

AU - Patil, Snehal

AU - Madan, Kavita

PY - 2015/7/1

Y1 - 2015/7/1

N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the retention rates and development of caries in permanent molars in children sealed with moisture-tolerant, resin-based (Embrace WetBond), and conventional resin-based (Helioseal) sealant over a period of one year. Methods: This was a double blind, split-mouth, randomized controlled trial among six- to nine-year-olds. Sixty-eight permanent mandibular first molars in 34 children were randomly assigned to be sealed with Embrace WetBond or Helioseal sealant. Results: The final sample was 32 children with 64 teeth. At 12 months, 23 of 32 (72 percent) sealants were completely retained in Embrace WetBond, whereas only 16 of 32 (50 percent) were retained in the Helioseal group. There was a statistically significant difference in retention rates of Embrace WetBond and Helioseal sealants at 12 months (P<.05). At 12 months follow-up, only two teeth developed caries in Embrace WetBond; in the Helioseal group, five teeth developed caries (two initial and three enamel caries). Conclusions: Embrace WetBond was superior to Helioseal sealant, as Embrace exhibited higher retention and lower caries scores. Embrace WetBond can be preferred over conventional resin-based sealants for community and outreach sealant programs where use of rubber dam for moisture control is difficult to practice.

AB - Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the retention rates and development of caries in permanent molars in children sealed with moisture-tolerant, resin-based (Embrace WetBond), and conventional resin-based (Helioseal) sealant over a period of one year. Methods: This was a double blind, split-mouth, randomized controlled trial among six- to nine-year-olds. Sixty-eight permanent mandibular first molars in 34 children were randomly assigned to be sealed with Embrace WetBond or Helioseal sealant. Results: The final sample was 32 children with 64 teeth. At 12 months, 23 of 32 (72 percent) sealants were completely retained in Embrace WetBond, whereas only 16 of 32 (50 percent) were retained in the Helioseal group. There was a statistically significant difference in retention rates of Embrace WetBond and Helioseal sealants at 12 months (P<.05). At 12 months follow-up, only two teeth developed caries in Embrace WetBond; in the Helioseal group, five teeth developed caries (two initial and three enamel caries). Conclusions: Embrace WetBond was superior to Helioseal sealant, as Embrace exhibited higher retention and lower caries scores. Embrace WetBond can be preferred over conventional resin-based sealants for community and outreach sealant programs where use of rubber dam for moisture control is difficult to practice.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84971407813&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84971407813&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 26314605

AN - SCOPUS:84971407813

VL - 37

SP - 366

EP - 370

JO - Pediatric Dentistry

JF - Pediatric Dentistry

SN - 0164-1263

IS - 4

ER -