TY - JOUR
T1 - Rim-to-Disc Ratio Outperforms Cup-to-Disc Ratio for Glaucoma Prescreening
AU - Kumar, J. R.Harish
AU - Seelamantula, Chandra Sekhar
AU - Kamath, Yogish Subraya
AU - Jampala, Rajani
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors would like to thank the providers of publicly available fundus image database used in this study, and Forus Health Pvt. Ltd. and Bosch Eye Care Solutions, Bengaluru, India, for providing fundus images acquired using their devices. Thanks also go out to Dr. Ravi Prasad K. J. for technical discussions on the significance of RDR and Kaushik Sambamurthy, Rittwik Adhikari, Subramanya Jois, and Harsha Sridhar for developing the iOS and Android Apps. This research is funded under the IMPRINT India Initiative (Domain: Healthcare; Project code: 6013) by the Ministry of Human Resource Development (MHRD), Government of India. The authors would also like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments, which greatly enhanced the quality of this contribution.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019, The Author(s).
PY - 2019/12/1
Y1 - 2019/12/1
N2 - We present a novel and fully automated fundus image processing technique for glaucoma prescreening based on the rim-to-disc ratio (RDR). The technique accurately segments the optic disc and optic cup and then computes the RDR based on which it is possible to differentiate a normal fundus from a glaucomatous one. The technique performs a further categorization into normal, moderate, or severely glaucomatous classes following the disc-damage-likelihood scale (DDLS). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first engineering attempt at using RDR and DDLS to perform glaucoma severity assessment. The segmentation of the optic disc and cup is based on the active disc, whose parameters are optimized to maximize the local contrast. The optimization is performed efficiently by means of a multiscale representation, accelerated gradient-descent, and Green’s theorem. Validations are performed on several publicly available databases as well as data provided by manufacturers of some commercially available fundus imaging devices. The segmentation and classification performance is assessed against expert clinician annotations in terms of sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, Jaccard, and Dice similarity indices. The results show that RDR based automated glaucoma assessment is about 8% to 10% more accurate than a cup-to-disc ratio (CDR) based system. An ablation study carried out considering the ground-truth expert outlines alone for classification showed that RDR is superior to CDR by 5.28% in a two-stage classification and about 3.21% in a three-stage severity grading.
AB - We present a novel and fully automated fundus image processing technique for glaucoma prescreening based on the rim-to-disc ratio (RDR). The technique accurately segments the optic disc and optic cup and then computes the RDR based on which it is possible to differentiate a normal fundus from a glaucomatous one. The technique performs a further categorization into normal, moderate, or severely glaucomatous classes following the disc-damage-likelihood scale (DDLS). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first engineering attempt at using RDR and DDLS to perform glaucoma severity assessment. The segmentation of the optic disc and cup is based on the active disc, whose parameters are optimized to maximize the local contrast. The optimization is performed efficiently by means of a multiscale representation, accelerated gradient-descent, and Green’s theorem. Validations are performed on several publicly available databases as well as data provided by manufacturers of some commercially available fundus imaging devices. The segmentation and classification performance is assessed against expert clinician annotations in terms of sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, Jaccard, and Dice similarity indices. The results show that RDR based automated glaucoma assessment is about 8% to 10% more accurate than a cup-to-disc ratio (CDR) based system. An ablation study carried out considering the ground-truth expert outlines alone for classification showed that RDR is superior to CDR by 5.28% in a two-stage classification and about 3.21% in a three-stage severity grading.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065593427&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85065593427&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1038/s41598-019-43385-2
DO - 10.1038/s41598-019-43385-2
M3 - Article
C2 - 31068608
AN - SCOPUS:85065593427
SN - 2045-2322
VL - 9
JO - Scientific Reports
JF - Scientific Reports
IS - 1
M1 - 7099
ER -