TY - JOUR
T1 - Serum protein profile studies of cervical cancers in monitoring of tumor response to radiotherapy using HPLC-LIF
T2 - A pilot study
AU - Vidyasagar, Mamidipudi Srinivasa
AU - Kodali, Maheedhar
AU - Balu, Prathima N.
AU - Baijal, Gunjan
AU - Vadhiraja, Bejadi Manjunath
AU - Bhat, Rani A.
AU - Fernandes, Donald Jerard
AU - Krishna, Chilakapati Murali
PY - 2009/8/1
Y1 - 2009/8/1
N2 - Objective: Exploration of the feasibility of serum protein profiles for monitoring tumor radioresponse in cervical cancers using HPLC-LIF system. Materials and methods: Twenty-one subjects were recruited in the study. Out of them 7 were healthy, 14 were cervical cancer patients who undertook fractionated radiotherapy (RT) with 2 Gy per fraction over 25 fractions, for 5 weeks followed by 2 applications of intracavitary brachytherapy once a week. Blood collected from above subjects was processed to obtain serum. Serum chromatograms of 'normal' (n=7) and conspicuous probes before RT (n=14, 'malignant') and 24 h after second fraction of RT (n=13, '2-RT'), were recorded using an In-house-built HPLC-LIF set-up. Data were analyzed in two approaches: (1) classical method using relative intensities of selected peaks, (2) principal component analysis (PCA). Clinical assessment of tumor radioresponse was carried out 4 months after first fraction of RT and the degree of the tumor shrinkage was determined as an index of radioresponsiveness (complete response (CR): 100% shrinkage, partial response (PR): ≥50% shrinkage, and no response (NR): ≤50% shrinkage) which was further correlated with the analysis of 2-RT serum chromatograms. Results: Normal vs. malignant chromatograms demonstrated pronounced differences in the 800-1800 s region. Malignant vs. 2-RT chromatograms showed minute variations in the 1300-1800 s region. Our analysis, in both of the approaches, produced clear differentiation between 'normal' and 'malignant', whereas differentiation between 'malignant' and '2-RT' was minimal. Clinical evaluation of the tumor radioresponse yielded that out of 13 patients (one patient discontinued the radiotherapy) ten showed CR, two showed PR and one NR. In case of prediction of tumor radioresponse, analysis of the 2-RT chromatograms produced only minor differentiation among CR, PR and NR groups. Conclusion: Protein profiling of serum samples differentiated 'normal' from 'malignant', but could not differentiate 'malignant' from '2-RT'. Also this technique has limited application in prediction of tumor radioresponse.
AB - Objective: Exploration of the feasibility of serum protein profiles for monitoring tumor radioresponse in cervical cancers using HPLC-LIF system. Materials and methods: Twenty-one subjects were recruited in the study. Out of them 7 were healthy, 14 were cervical cancer patients who undertook fractionated radiotherapy (RT) with 2 Gy per fraction over 25 fractions, for 5 weeks followed by 2 applications of intracavitary brachytherapy once a week. Blood collected from above subjects was processed to obtain serum. Serum chromatograms of 'normal' (n=7) and conspicuous probes before RT (n=14, 'malignant') and 24 h after second fraction of RT (n=13, '2-RT'), were recorded using an In-house-built HPLC-LIF set-up. Data were analyzed in two approaches: (1) classical method using relative intensities of selected peaks, (2) principal component analysis (PCA). Clinical assessment of tumor radioresponse was carried out 4 months after first fraction of RT and the degree of the tumor shrinkage was determined as an index of radioresponsiveness (complete response (CR): 100% shrinkage, partial response (PR): ≥50% shrinkage, and no response (NR): ≤50% shrinkage) which was further correlated with the analysis of 2-RT serum chromatograms. Results: Normal vs. malignant chromatograms demonstrated pronounced differences in the 800-1800 s region. Malignant vs. 2-RT chromatograms showed minute variations in the 1300-1800 s region. Our analysis, in both of the approaches, produced clear differentiation between 'normal' and 'malignant', whereas differentiation between 'malignant' and '2-RT' was minimal. Clinical evaluation of the tumor radioresponse yielded that out of 13 patients (one patient discontinued the radiotherapy) ten showed CR, two showed PR and one NR. In case of prediction of tumor radioresponse, analysis of the 2-RT chromatograms produced only minor differentiation among CR, PR and NR groups. Conclusion: Protein profiling of serum samples differentiated 'normal' from 'malignant', but could not differentiate 'malignant' from '2-RT'. Also this technique has limited application in prediction of tumor radioresponse.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67650090491&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=67650090491&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.mla.2009.05.005
DO - 10.1016/j.mla.2009.05.005
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:67650090491
SN - 1615-1615
VL - 24
SP - 165
EP - 174
JO - Lasermedizin
JF - Lasermedizin
IS - 3
ER -