Slime production a virulence marker in Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains isolated from clinical and environmental specimens

A comparative study of two methods

S. Vishnu Prasad, Mamatha Ballal, P. G. Shivananda

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Detection of slime in Pseudomonas aeruginosa can be useful in understanding the virulence of this organism. Here, comparative studies of two phenotypic methods using the tube method and the spectrophotometric method for slime production from 100 clinically and 21 environmentally significant isolates of P. aeruginosa were performed. A total of 68 isolates were positive by either of the tests whereas only 34 were positive by both the tests. The tube method detected slime significantly in more number of isolates than the spectrophotometric method. The tube test was found to be superior to the spectrophotometric method in ease of performance, interpretation and sensitivity. Among the clinical isolates, systemic isolates produce less slime compared to wound, respiratory and urinary isolates. Isolates from the hospital environment produced more slime indicating that this virulence marker helps the organism to survive for longer periods and cause nosocomial infections.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)191-193
Number of pages3
JournalIndian Journal of Pathology and Microbiology
Volume52
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01-04-2009

Fingerprint

Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Virulence
Cross Infection
Wounds and Injuries

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Microbiology (medical)

Cite this

@article{de43fdad5b2041d3879170c28ae2f029,
title = "Slime production a virulence marker in Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains isolated from clinical and environmental specimens: A comparative study of two methods",
abstract = "Detection of slime in Pseudomonas aeruginosa can be useful in understanding the virulence of this organism. Here, comparative studies of two phenotypic methods using the tube method and the spectrophotometric method for slime production from 100 clinically and 21 environmentally significant isolates of P. aeruginosa were performed. A total of 68 isolates were positive by either of the tests whereas only 34 were positive by both the tests. The tube method detected slime significantly in more number of isolates than the spectrophotometric method. The tube test was found to be superior to the spectrophotometric method in ease of performance, interpretation and sensitivity. Among the clinical isolates, systemic isolates produce less slime compared to wound, respiratory and urinary isolates. Isolates from the hospital environment produced more slime indicating that this virulence marker helps the organism to survive for longer periods and cause nosocomial infections.",
author = "Prasad, {S. Vishnu} and Mamatha Ballal and Shivananda, {P. G.}",
year = "2009",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.4103/0377-4929.48914",
language = "English",
volume = "52",
pages = "191--193",
journal = "Indian Journal of Pathology and Microbiology",
issn = "0377-4929",
publisher = "Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Slime production a virulence marker in Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains isolated from clinical and environmental specimens

T2 - A comparative study of two methods

AU - Prasad, S. Vishnu

AU - Ballal, Mamatha

AU - Shivananda, P. G.

PY - 2009/4/1

Y1 - 2009/4/1

N2 - Detection of slime in Pseudomonas aeruginosa can be useful in understanding the virulence of this organism. Here, comparative studies of two phenotypic methods using the tube method and the spectrophotometric method for slime production from 100 clinically and 21 environmentally significant isolates of P. aeruginosa were performed. A total of 68 isolates were positive by either of the tests whereas only 34 were positive by both the tests. The tube method detected slime significantly in more number of isolates than the spectrophotometric method. The tube test was found to be superior to the spectrophotometric method in ease of performance, interpretation and sensitivity. Among the clinical isolates, systemic isolates produce less slime compared to wound, respiratory and urinary isolates. Isolates from the hospital environment produced more slime indicating that this virulence marker helps the organism to survive for longer periods and cause nosocomial infections.

AB - Detection of slime in Pseudomonas aeruginosa can be useful in understanding the virulence of this organism. Here, comparative studies of two phenotypic methods using the tube method and the spectrophotometric method for slime production from 100 clinically and 21 environmentally significant isolates of P. aeruginosa were performed. A total of 68 isolates were positive by either of the tests whereas only 34 were positive by both the tests. The tube method detected slime significantly in more number of isolates than the spectrophotometric method. The tube test was found to be superior to the spectrophotometric method in ease of performance, interpretation and sensitivity. Among the clinical isolates, systemic isolates produce less slime compared to wound, respiratory and urinary isolates. Isolates from the hospital environment produced more slime indicating that this virulence marker helps the organism to survive for longer periods and cause nosocomial infections.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=63449107411&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=63449107411&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4103/0377-4929.48914

DO - 10.4103/0377-4929.48914

M3 - Article

VL - 52

SP - 191

EP - 193

JO - Indian Journal of Pathology and Microbiology

JF - Indian Journal of Pathology and Microbiology

SN - 0377-4929

IS - 2

ER -