Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the sound levels generated in dental clinics of conservative dentistry and endodontics. Material and Methods: A decibel-meter with digital readout was used to measure sound levels at different time intervals at the chairside and at the center of the clinic. Minimum and maximum readings during a 3 min interval were recorded. Results: In the post-graduate (PG) clinic, there was significant difference in noise levels between the chairside (66-81 dB[A]) and the center of the clinic (66-67 dB[A]) at certain times. In the under graduate (UG) clinic, noise levels with suction and either high/slow speed handpieces (67-80 dB[A]) were significantly higher than the center of clinic. Suction alone in the UG clinic (63-75 dB[A]) was significantly quieter than in the PG clinic (69-79 dB[A]). Conclusions: (1) Mean sound levels in the working clinics ranged from 63.0 dB[A] to 81.5 dB[A]. These are within the recommended range for dental equipment. (2) With suction and either low/high speed handpiece combination, the PG clinic was significantly noisier than the UG clinic at several time periods.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)121-125
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Conservative Dentistry
Volume16
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01-03-2013

Fingerprint

Endodontics
Suction
Dentistry
Noise
Dental Equipment
Dental Clinics
Reading

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

@article{88aa4355c66f4912bc0f2ea84bad664c,
title = "Sound levels in conservative dentistry and endodontics clinic",
abstract = "Aim: To evaluate the sound levels generated in dental clinics of conservative dentistry and endodontics. Material and Methods: A decibel-meter with digital readout was used to measure sound levels at different time intervals at the chairside and at the center of the clinic. Minimum and maximum readings during a 3 min interval were recorded. Results: In the post-graduate (PG) clinic, there was significant difference in noise levels between the chairside (66-81 dB[A]) and the center of the clinic (66-67 dB[A]) at certain times. In the under graduate (UG) clinic, noise levels with suction and either high/slow speed handpieces (67-80 dB[A]) were significantly higher than the center of clinic. Suction alone in the UG clinic (63-75 dB[A]) was significantly quieter than in the PG clinic (69-79 dB[A]). Conclusions: (1) Mean sound levels in the working clinics ranged from 63.0 dB[A] to 81.5 dB[A]. These are within the recommended range for dental equipment. (2) With suction and either low/high speed handpiece combination, the PG clinic was significantly noisier than the UG clinic at several time periods.",
author = "Arindam Dutta and Kundabala Mala and Acharya, {Shashi Rashmi}",
year = "2013",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.4103/0972-0707.108188",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "121--125",
journal = "Journal of Conservative Dentistry",
issn = "0972-0707",
publisher = "Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd",
number = "2",

}

Sound levels in conservative dentistry and endodontics clinic. / Dutta, Arindam; Mala, Kundabala; Acharya, Shashi Rashmi.

In: Journal of Conservative Dentistry, Vol. 16, No. 2, 01.03.2013, p. 121-125.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sound levels in conservative dentistry and endodontics clinic

AU - Dutta, Arindam

AU - Mala, Kundabala

AU - Acharya, Shashi Rashmi

PY - 2013/3/1

Y1 - 2013/3/1

N2 - Aim: To evaluate the sound levels generated in dental clinics of conservative dentistry and endodontics. Material and Methods: A decibel-meter with digital readout was used to measure sound levels at different time intervals at the chairside and at the center of the clinic. Minimum and maximum readings during a 3 min interval were recorded. Results: In the post-graduate (PG) clinic, there was significant difference in noise levels between the chairside (66-81 dB[A]) and the center of the clinic (66-67 dB[A]) at certain times. In the under graduate (UG) clinic, noise levels with suction and either high/slow speed handpieces (67-80 dB[A]) were significantly higher than the center of clinic. Suction alone in the UG clinic (63-75 dB[A]) was significantly quieter than in the PG clinic (69-79 dB[A]). Conclusions: (1) Mean sound levels in the working clinics ranged from 63.0 dB[A] to 81.5 dB[A]. These are within the recommended range for dental equipment. (2) With suction and either low/high speed handpiece combination, the PG clinic was significantly noisier than the UG clinic at several time periods.

AB - Aim: To evaluate the sound levels generated in dental clinics of conservative dentistry and endodontics. Material and Methods: A decibel-meter with digital readout was used to measure sound levels at different time intervals at the chairside and at the center of the clinic. Minimum and maximum readings during a 3 min interval were recorded. Results: In the post-graduate (PG) clinic, there was significant difference in noise levels between the chairside (66-81 dB[A]) and the center of the clinic (66-67 dB[A]) at certain times. In the under graduate (UG) clinic, noise levels with suction and either high/slow speed handpieces (67-80 dB[A]) were significantly higher than the center of clinic. Suction alone in the UG clinic (63-75 dB[A]) was significantly quieter than in the PG clinic (69-79 dB[A]). Conclusions: (1) Mean sound levels in the working clinics ranged from 63.0 dB[A] to 81.5 dB[A]. These are within the recommended range for dental equipment. (2) With suction and either low/high speed handpiece combination, the PG clinic was significantly noisier than the UG clinic at several time periods.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84875912568&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84875912568&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4103/0972-0707.108188

DO - 10.4103/0972-0707.108188

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 121

EP - 125

JO - Journal of Conservative Dentistry

JF - Journal of Conservative Dentistry

SN - 0972-0707

IS - 2

ER -