Space closure in bialveolar dental protrusion cases - A comparative combination method

N. Chaitanya, A. M. Arshad, K. R.K. Praveen, C. Prashant, Sandeep Bailwad, P. Navin, O. Balaji, C. Yogesh, K. Saurab

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To measure and compare the amount, rate and anchor loss after the en masse retraction of all anteriors with titanium mini-implant anchorage and conventional molar anchorage. Methods: This comparative clinical study sample comprised 12 patients (10 females, 2 males; mean age between 16 and 22 years). The implants were placed in the maxillary and mandibular arches. Preretraction and post retraction lateral cephalograms were taken for measuring the amount, rate and anchor loss after the retraction. Results: Mean en masse retraction amounts, the rate of movement per month, and horizontal and vertical anchor loss at the maxillary implant site were 4.79 mm, 0.58 mm, 0 mm, and 0 mm, respectively. In the mandible, on implant sides were 4.66 mm, 0.56 mm, 0 mm, and 0 mm. Mean en masse retraction amounts, the rate of movement per month, and horizontal and vertical anchor loss at the maxillary conventional molar anchor side were 4.08 mm, 0.49 mm, 2.91 mm, and 1.66 mm. In the mandible, on conventional anchor sides were 3.54 mm, 0.48 mm, 3.12 mm, and 1.95 mm. Conclusion: En masse retraction had a faster rate of space closure with mini-implants as anchor units than the conventional molar anchorage preparation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)106-109
Number of pages4
JournalAsian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research
Volume10
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01-01-2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Mandible
Tooth
Titanium
Clinical Studies

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Pharmacology
  • Pharmaceutical Science
  • Pharmacology (medical)

Cite this

Chaitanya, N., Arshad, A. M., Praveen, K. R. K., Prashant, C., Bailwad, S., Navin, P., ... Saurab, K. (2017). Space closure in bialveolar dental protrusion cases - A comparative combination method. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research, 10(7), 106-109. https://doi.org/10.22159/ajpcr.2017.v10i7.17504
Chaitanya, N. ; Arshad, A. M. ; Praveen, K. R.K. ; Prashant, C. ; Bailwad, Sandeep ; Navin, P. ; Balaji, O. ; Yogesh, C. ; Saurab, K. / Space closure in bialveolar dental protrusion cases - A comparative combination method. In: Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research. 2017 ; Vol. 10, No. 7. pp. 106-109.
@article{d3abf39280d04059b5799c0b5c04e828,
title = "Space closure in bialveolar dental protrusion cases - A comparative combination method",
abstract = "Objective: To measure and compare the amount, rate and anchor loss after the en masse retraction of all anteriors with titanium mini-implant anchorage and conventional molar anchorage. Methods: This comparative clinical study sample comprised 12 patients (10 females, 2 males; mean age between 16 and 22 years). The implants were placed in the maxillary and mandibular arches. Preretraction and post retraction lateral cephalograms were taken for measuring the amount, rate and anchor loss after the retraction. Results: Mean en masse retraction amounts, the rate of movement per month, and horizontal and vertical anchor loss at the maxillary implant site were 4.79 mm, 0.58 mm, 0 mm, and 0 mm, respectively. In the mandible, on implant sides were 4.66 mm, 0.56 mm, 0 mm, and 0 mm. Mean en masse retraction amounts, the rate of movement per month, and horizontal and vertical anchor loss at the maxillary conventional molar anchor side were 4.08 mm, 0.49 mm, 2.91 mm, and 1.66 mm. In the mandible, on conventional anchor sides were 3.54 mm, 0.48 mm, 3.12 mm, and 1.95 mm. Conclusion: En masse retraction had a faster rate of space closure with mini-implants as anchor units than the conventional molar anchorage preparation.",
author = "N. Chaitanya and Arshad, {A. M.} and Praveen, {K. R.K.} and C. Prashant and Sandeep Bailwad and P. Navin and O. Balaji and C. Yogesh and K. Saurab",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.22159/ajpcr.2017.v10i7.17504",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "106--109",
journal = "Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research",
issn = "0974-2441",
publisher = "Innovare Academics Sciences Pvt. Ltd",
number = "7",

}

Chaitanya, N, Arshad, AM, Praveen, KRK, Prashant, C, Bailwad, S, Navin, P, Balaji, O, Yogesh, C & Saurab, K 2017, 'Space closure in bialveolar dental protrusion cases - A comparative combination method', Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research, vol. 10, no. 7, pp. 106-109. https://doi.org/10.22159/ajpcr.2017.v10i7.17504

Space closure in bialveolar dental protrusion cases - A comparative combination method. / Chaitanya, N.; Arshad, A. M.; Praveen, K. R.K.; Prashant, C.; Bailwad, Sandeep; Navin, P.; Balaji, O.; Yogesh, C.; Saurab, K.

In: Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research, Vol. 10, No. 7, 01.01.2017, p. 106-109.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Space closure in bialveolar dental protrusion cases - A comparative combination method

AU - Chaitanya, N.

AU - Arshad, A. M.

AU - Praveen, K. R.K.

AU - Prashant, C.

AU - Bailwad, Sandeep

AU - Navin, P.

AU - Balaji, O.

AU - Yogesh, C.

AU - Saurab, K.

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Objective: To measure and compare the amount, rate and anchor loss after the en masse retraction of all anteriors with titanium mini-implant anchorage and conventional molar anchorage. Methods: This comparative clinical study sample comprised 12 patients (10 females, 2 males; mean age between 16 and 22 years). The implants were placed in the maxillary and mandibular arches. Preretraction and post retraction lateral cephalograms were taken for measuring the amount, rate and anchor loss after the retraction. Results: Mean en masse retraction amounts, the rate of movement per month, and horizontal and vertical anchor loss at the maxillary implant site were 4.79 mm, 0.58 mm, 0 mm, and 0 mm, respectively. In the mandible, on implant sides were 4.66 mm, 0.56 mm, 0 mm, and 0 mm. Mean en masse retraction amounts, the rate of movement per month, and horizontal and vertical anchor loss at the maxillary conventional molar anchor side were 4.08 mm, 0.49 mm, 2.91 mm, and 1.66 mm. In the mandible, on conventional anchor sides were 3.54 mm, 0.48 mm, 3.12 mm, and 1.95 mm. Conclusion: En masse retraction had a faster rate of space closure with mini-implants as anchor units than the conventional molar anchorage preparation.

AB - Objective: To measure and compare the amount, rate and anchor loss after the en masse retraction of all anteriors with titanium mini-implant anchorage and conventional molar anchorage. Methods: This comparative clinical study sample comprised 12 patients (10 females, 2 males; mean age between 16 and 22 years). The implants were placed in the maxillary and mandibular arches. Preretraction and post retraction lateral cephalograms were taken for measuring the amount, rate and anchor loss after the retraction. Results: Mean en masse retraction amounts, the rate of movement per month, and horizontal and vertical anchor loss at the maxillary implant site were 4.79 mm, 0.58 mm, 0 mm, and 0 mm, respectively. In the mandible, on implant sides were 4.66 mm, 0.56 mm, 0 mm, and 0 mm. Mean en masse retraction amounts, the rate of movement per month, and horizontal and vertical anchor loss at the maxillary conventional molar anchor side were 4.08 mm, 0.49 mm, 2.91 mm, and 1.66 mm. In the mandible, on conventional anchor sides were 3.54 mm, 0.48 mm, 3.12 mm, and 1.95 mm. Conclusion: En masse retraction had a faster rate of space closure with mini-implants as anchor units than the conventional molar anchorage preparation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85021703698&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85021703698&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.22159/ajpcr.2017.v10i7.17504

DO - 10.22159/ajpcr.2017.v10i7.17504

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - 106

EP - 109

JO - Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research

JF - Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research

SN - 0974-2441

IS - 7

ER -