Systematic review and meta‑analysis of the prevalence of molar‑incisor hypomineralization

Kalyana Chakravarthy Pentapati, Sravan Kumar Yeturu, Hanan Siddiq

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Aims: This systematic review and meta‑analysis aimed to evaluate the pooled prevalence of molar‑incisor hypomineralization (MIH) among children. Methods: Three databases (PubMed, Scopus, and CINAHL) were searched till January 1, 2017, for the prevalence of MIH among children. The heterogeneity of the publications was evaluated using I2 statistics. Two trained reviewers conducted risk of bias assessment with nine item checklist for prevalence studies. Results: Analysis of the included publications revealed a pooled prevalence of 11.24 (confidence interval = 9.23–13.45) with the use of quality effects model. Heterogeneity among the included publications was high. The risk of bias assessment showed that majority of them were in the low‑risk category. Conclusions: MIH is a common problem and one in 10 children could be affected by MIH.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)243-250
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of International Oral Health
Volume9
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01-11-2017

Fingerprint

Publications
Checklist
PubMed
Cross-Sectional Studies
Databases
Confidence Intervals

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

@article{e5793f1b7f3b4358a4f8e346b19b2f4f,
title = "Systematic review and meta‑analysis of the prevalence of molar‑incisor hypomineralization",
abstract = "Aims: This systematic review and meta‑analysis aimed to evaluate the pooled prevalence of molar‑incisor hypomineralization (MIH) among children. Methods: Three databases (PubMed, Scopus, and CINAHL) were searched till January 1, 2017, for the prevalence of MIH among children. The heterogeneity of the publications was evaluated using I2 statistics. Two trained reviewers conducted risk of bias assessment with nine item checklist for prevalence studies. Results: Analysis of the included publications revealed a pooled prevalence of 11.24 (confidence interval = 9.23–13.45) with the use of quality effects model. Heterogeneity among the included publications was high. The risk of bias assessment showed that majority of them were in the low‑risk category. Conclusions: MIH is a common problem and one in 10 children could be affected by MIH.",
author = "Pentapati, {Kalyana Chakravarthy} and Yeturu, {Sravan Kumar} and Hanan Siddiq",
year = "2017",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.4103/jioh.jioh_241_17",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "243--250",
journal = "Journal of International Oral Health",
issn = "0976-7428",
publisher = "Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd",
number = "6",

}

Systematic review and meta‑analysis of the prevalence of molar‑incisor hypomineralization. / Pentapati, Kalyana Chakravarthy; Yeturu, Sravan Kumar; Siddiq, Hanan.

In: Journal of International Oral Health, Vol. 9, No. 6, 01.11.2017, p. 243-250.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Systematic review and meta‑analysis of the prevalence of molar‑incisor hypomineralization

AU - Pentapati, Kalyana Chakravarthy

AU - Yeturu, Sravan Kumar

AU - Siddiq, Hanan

PY - 2017/11/1

Y1 - 2017/11/1

N2 - Aims: This systematic review and meta‑analysis aimed to evaluate the pooled prevalence of molar‑incisor hypomineralization (MIH) among children. Methods: Three databases (PubMed, Scopus, and CINAHL) were searched till January 1, 2017, for the prevalence of MIH among children. The heterogeneity of the publications was evaluated using I2 statistics. Two trained reviewers conducted risk of bias assessment with nine item checklist for prevalence studies. Results: Analysis of the included publications revealed a pooled prevalence of 11.24 (confidence interval = 9.23–13.45) with the use of quality effects model. Heterogeneity among the included publications was high. The risk of bias assessment showed that majority of them were in the low‑risk category. Conclusions: MIH is a common problem and one in 10 children could be affected by MIH.

AB - Aims: This systematic review and meta‑analysis aimed to evaluate the pooled prevalence of molar‑incisor hypomineralization (MIH) among children. Methods: Three databases (PubMed, Scopus, and CINAHL) were searched till January 1, 2017, for the prevalence of MIH among children. The heterogeneity of the publications was evaluated using I2 statistics. Two trained reviewers conducted risk of bias assessment with nine item checklist for prevalence studies. Results: Analysis of the included publications revealed a pooled prevalence of 11.24 (confidence interval = 9.23–13.45) with the use of quality effects model. Heterogeneity among the included publications was high. The risk of bias assessment showed that majority of them were in the low‑risk category. Conclusions: MIH is a common problem and one in 10 children could be affected by MIH.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047524667&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85047524667&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4103/jioh.jioh_241_17

DO - 10.4103/jioh.jioh_241_17

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 243

EP - 250

JO - Journal of International Oral Health

JF - Journal of International Oral Health

SN - 0976-7428

IS - 6

ER -