Task-specific bench model training versus basic laparoscopic skills training for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

A randomized controlled study

Robert Sabbagh, Suman Chatterjee, Arun Chawla, Anil Kapoor, Edward D. Matsumoto

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Performing a laparoscopic urethrovesical anastomosis (LUA) after a radical prostatectomy is technically challenging for the novice laparoscopic surgeon. We developed a low-fidelity urethrovesical model (UVM) to allow a urologist to practise this critical step. The aim of our study was to compare the effect of task-specific bench model training (anastomotic suturing on the UVM) with that of basic laparoscopic suturing on intracorporeal urethrovesical anastomosis performance. Methods: We recruited 28 senior surgical residents, fellows or staff surgeons for this prospective, single-blinded, randomized controlled study. We randomly assigned participants to an intervention group practising LUA on the UVM or to a control group practicing basic laparoscopic suturing and knot-tying on a foam pad. After practising, we videotaped participants performing 5 intracorporeal interrupted sutures on a foam pad and a LUA on the UVM. A blinded expert scored the videotaped performance using a laparoscopic suturing checklist (CL) and a global rating scale (GRS), and timed the performance. Results: On the foam pad suturing task, the group that trained on the UVM had significantly higher CL scores (10.9 v. 8.1, p = 0.017). On the LUA task, the group that trained on the UVM had significantly higher CL scores (10.9 v. 8.1, p = 0.017), GRS (29.6 v. 22.8, p = 0.005) and shorter times (27.6 v. 38.3 min, p = 0.004) than the control group. Conclusion: Our task-specific bench model was shown to be superior to basic laparoscopic suturing drills on a foam pad.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)22-30
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of the Canadian Urological Association
Volume3
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 28-10-2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Prostatectomy
Checklist
Control Groups
Mandrillus
Sutures
Surgeons

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Oncology
  • Urology

Cite this

Sabbagh, Robert ; Chatterjee, Suman ; Chawla, Arun ; Kapoor, Anil ; Matsumoto, Edward D. / Task-specific bench model training versus basic laparoscopic skills training for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy : A randomized controlled study. In: Journal of the Canadian Urological Association. 2009 ; Vol. 3, No. 1. pp. 22-30.
@article{50c4b2c92e9b4ef59bae68b56c31f3ba,
title = "Task-specific bench model training versus basic laparoscopic skills training for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: A randomized controlled study",
abstract = "Background: Performing a laparoscopic urethrovesical anastomosis (LUA) after a radical prostatectomy is technically challenging for the novice laparoscopic surgeon. We developed a low-fidelity urethrovesical model (UVM) to allow a urologist to practise this critical step. The aim of our study was to compare the effect of task-specific bench model training (anastomotic suturing on the UVM) with that of basic laparoscopic suturing on intracorporeal urethrovesical anastomosis performance. Methods: We recruited 28 senior surgical residents, fellows or staff surgeons for this prospective, single-blinded, randomized controlled study. We randomly assigned participants to an intervention group practising LUA on the UVM or to a control group practicing basic laparoscopic suturing and knot-tying on a foam pad. After practising, we videotaped participants performing 5 intracorporeal interrupted sutures on a foam pad and a LUA on the UVM. A blinded expert scored the videotaped performance using a laparoscopic suturing checklist (CL) and a global rating scale (GRS), and timed the performance. Results: On the foam pad suturing task, the group that trained on the UVM had significantly higher CL scores (10.9 v. 8.1, p = 0.017). On the LUA task, the group that trained on the UVM had significantly higher CL scores (10.9 v. 8.1, p = 0.017), GRS (29.6 v. 22.8, p = 0.005) and shorter times (27.6 v. 38.3 min, p = 0.004) than the control group. Conclusion: Our task-specific bench model was shown to be superior to basic laparoscopic suturing drills on a foam pad.",
author = "Robert Sabbagh and Suman Chatterjee and Arun Chawla and Anil Kapoor and Matsumoto, {Edward D.}",
year = "2009",
month = "10",
day = "28",
language = "English",
volume = "3",
pages = "22--30",
journal = "Journal of the Canadian Urological Association",
issn = "1911-6470",
publisher = "Canadian Medical Association",
number = "1",

}

Task-specific bench model training versus basic laparoscopic skills training for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy : A randomized controlled study. / Sabbagh, Robert; Chatterjee, Suman; Chawla, Arun; Kapoor, Anil; Matsumoto, Edward D.

In: Journal of the Canadian Urological Association, Vol. 3, No. 1, 28.10.2009, p. 22-30.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Task-specific bench model training versus basic laparoscopic skills training for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

T2 - A randomized controlled study

AU - Sabbagh, Robert

AU - Chatterjee, Suman

AU - Chawla, Arun

AU - Kapoor, Anil

AU - Matsumoto, Edward D.

PY - 2009/10/28

Y1 - 2009/10/28

N2 - Background: Performing a laparoscopic urethrovesical anastomosis (LUA) after a radical prostatectomy is technically challenging for the novice laparoscopic surgeon. We developed a low-fidelity urethrovesical model (UVM) to allow a urologist to practise this critical step. The aim of our study was to compare the effect of task-specific bench model training (anastomotic suturing on the UVM) with that of basic laparoscopic suturing on intracorporeal urethrovesical anastomosis performance. Methods: We recruited 28 senior surgical residents, fellows or staff surgeons for this prospective, single-blinded, randomized controlled study. We randomly assigned participants to an intervention group practising LUA on the UVM or to a control group practicing basic laparoscopic suturing and knot-tying on a foam pad. After practising, we videotaped participants performing 5 intracorporeal interrupted sutures on a foam pad and a LUA on the UVM. A blinded expert scored the videotaped performance using a laparoscopic suturing checklist (CL) and a global rating scale (GRS), and timed the performance. Results: On the foam pad suturing task, the group that trained on the UVM had significantly higher CL scores (10.9 v. 8.1, p = 0.017). On the LUA task, the group that trained on the UVM had significantly higher CL scores (10.9 v. 8.1, p = 0.017), GRS (29.6 v. 22.8, p = 0.005) and shorter times (27.6 v. 38.3 min, p = 0.004) than the control group. Conclusion: Our task-specific bench model was shown to be superior to basic laparoscopic suturing drills on a foam pad.

AB - Background: Performing a laparoscopic urethrovesical anastomosis (LUA) after a radical prostatectomy is technically challenging for the novice laparoscopic surgeon. We developed a low-fidelity urethrovesical model (UVM) to allow a urologist to practise this critical step. The aim of our study was to compare the effect of task-specific bench model training (anastomotic suturing on the UVM) with that of basic laparoscopic suturing on intracorporeal urethrovesical anastomosis performance. Methods: We recruited 28 senior surgical residents, fellows or staff surgeons for this prospective, single-blinded, randomized controlled study. We randomly assigned participants to an intervention group practising LUA on the UVM or to a control group practicing basic laparoscopic suturing and knot-tying on a foam pad. After practising, we videotaped participants performing 5 intracorporeal interrupted sutures on a foam pad and a LUA on the UVM. A blinded expert scored the videotaped performance using a laparoscopic suturing checklist (CL) and a global rating scale (GRS), and timed the performance. Results: On the foam pad suturing task, the group that trained on the UVM had significantly higher CL scores (10.9 v. 8.1, p = 0.017). On the LUA task, the group that trained on the UVM had significantly higher CL scores (10.9 v. 8.1, p = 0.017), GRS (29.6 v. 22.8, p = 0.005) and shorter times (27.6 v. 38.3 min, p = 0.004) than the control group. Conclusion: Our task-specific bench model was shown to be superior to basic laparoscopic suturing drills on a foam pad.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70350327907&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70350327907&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 3

SP - 22

EP - 30

JO - Journal of the Canadian Urological Association

JF - Journal of the Canadian Urological Association

SN - 1911-6470

IS - 1

ER -