The efficacy of different irrigation protocols in removing tricalcium silicate-based sealers from simulated root canal irregularities

Nidambur Vasudev Ballal, Özgür İlke Ulusoy, Sheetal Rao, Poornika Gandhi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of different irrigation protocols in removing two tricalcium silicate-based sealers from simulated root canal irregularities and root canal walls. Material and methods: Root canals of 140 single-rooted teeth were instrumented. In one-half of each root, an apical groove was created. The samples were divided into two main groups (n = 70) based on the sealer used. In group 1, the grooves were filled with MTA Fillapex; in group 2, BioRoot RCS. The reassembled root halves were divided into six experimental and one control groups: 2.5% NaOCl-17% EDTA (Passive ultrasonic irrigation [PUI]), 5% NaOCl/9% DualRinse HEDP (PUI), 2.5% NaOCl-7% Maleic acid (PUI), 2.5% NaOCl-17% EDTA (Er:YAG laser activated irrigation [LAI]), 2.5% NaOCl/9% DualRinse HEDP (LAI), 2.5% NaOCl-7% Maleic acid (LAI), Distilled water (Control). Specimens were scored using SEM. The data were analysed using Kruskal-Wallis and Mann Whitney U tests. Results: Maleic acid and DualRinse HEDP removed higher amounts of MTA Fillapex from the grooves compared to EDTA, when used with both activation methods (p <.001). Conclusions: Ultrasonically activated maleic acid or DualRinse HEDP can be an effective irrigation regimen in removing tricalcium silicate-based sealers.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1862-1868
Number of pages7
JournalMicroscopy Research and Technique
Volume82
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01-11-2019

Fingerprint

Etidronic Acid
sealers
irrigation
canals
Dental Pulp Cavity
Canals
irregularities
Irrigation
Silicates
silicates
Ultrasonics
Edetic Acid
ethylenediaminetetraacetic acids
Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid
Lasers
grooves
acids
Acids
ultrasonics
Solid-State Lasers

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Anatomy
  • Histology
  • Instrumentation
  • Medical Laboratory Technology

Cite this

@article{c0e8a73a0f984ce5b5bb0ca3590b744a,
title = "The efficacy of different irrigation protocols in removing tricalcium silicate-based sealers from simulated root canal irregularities",
abstract = "Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of different irrigation protocols in removing two tricalcium silicate-based sealers from simulated root canal irregularities and root canal walls. Material and methods: Root canals of 140 single-rooted teeth were instrumented. In one-half of each root, an apical groove was created. The samples were divided into two main groups (n = 70) based on the sealer used. In group 1, the grooves were filled with MTA Fillapex; in group 2, BioRoot RCS. The reassembled root halves were divided into six experimental and one control groups: 2.5{\%} NaOCl-17{\%} EDTA (Passive ultrasonic irrigation [PUI]), 5{\%} NaOCl/9{\%} DualRinse HEDP (PUI), 2.5{\%} NaOCl-7{\%} Maleic acid (PUI), 2.5{\%} NaOCl-17{\%} EDTA (Er:YAG laser activated irrigation [LAI]), 2.5{\%} NaOCl/9{\%} DualRinse HEDP (LAI), 2.5{\%} NaOCl-7{\%} Maleic acid (LAI), Distilled water (Control). Specimens were scored using SEM. The data were analysed using Kruskal-Wallis and Mann Whitney U tests. Results: Maleic acid and DualRinse HEDP removed higher amounts of MTA Fillapex from the grooves compared to EDTA, when used with both activation methods (p <.001). Conclusions: Ultrasonically activated maleic acid or DualRinse HEDP can be an effective irrigation regimen in removing tricalcium silicate-based sealers.",
author = "Ballal, {Nidambur Vasudev} and Ulusoy, {{\"O}zg{\"u}r İlke} and Sheetal Rao and Poornika Gandhi",
year = "2019",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/jemt.23353",
language = "English",
volume = "82",
pages = "1862--1868",
journal = "Microscopy Research and Technique",
issn = "1059-910X",
publisher = "Wiley-Liss Inc.",
number = "11",

}

The efficacy of different irrigation protocols in removing tricalcium silicate-based sealers from simulated root canal irregularities. / Ballal, Nidambur Vasudev; Ulusoy, Özgür İlke; Rao, Sheetal; Gandhi, Poornika.

In: Microscopy Research and Technique, Vol. 82, No. 11, 01.11.2019, p. 1862-1868.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The efficacy of different irrigation protocols in removing tricalcium silicate-based sealers from simulated root canal irregularities

AU - Ballal, Nidambur Vasudev

AU - Ulusoy, Özgür İlke

AU - Rao, Sheetal

AU - Gandhi, Poornika

PY - 2019/11/1

Y1 - 2019/11/1

N2 - Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of different irrigation protocols in removing two tricalcium silicate-based sealers from simulated root canal irregularities and root canal walls. Material and methods: Root canals of 140 single-rooted teeth were instrumented. In one-half of each root, an apical groove was created. The samples were divided into two main groups (n = 70) based on the sealer used. In group 1, the grooves were filled with MTA Fillapex; in group 2, BioRoot RCS. The reassembled root halves were divided into six experimental and one control groups: 2.5% NaOCl-17% EDTA (Passive ultrasonic irrigation [PUI]), 5% NaOCl/9% DualRinse HEDP (PUI), 2.5% NaOCl-7% Maleic acid (PUI), 2.5% NaOCl-17% EDTA (Er:YAG laser activated irrigation [LAI]), 2.5% NaOCl/9% DualRinse HEDP (LAI), 2.5% NaOCl-7% Maleic acid (LAI), Distilled water (Control). Specimens were scored using SEM. The data were analysed using Kruskal-Wallis and Mann Whitney U tests. Results: Maleic acid and DualRinse HEDP removed higher amounts of MTA Fillapex from the grooves compared to EDTA, when used with both activation methods (p <.001). Conclusions: Ultrasonically activated maleic acid or DualRinse HEDP can be an effective irrigation regimen in removing tricalcium silicate-based sealers.

AB - Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of different irrigation protocols in removing two tricalcium silicate-based sealers from simulated root canal irregularities and root canal walls. Material and methods: Root canals of 140 single-rooted teeth were instrumented. In one-half of each root, an apical groove was created. The samples were divided into two main groups (n = 70) based on the sealer used. In group 1, the grooves were filled with MTA Fillapex; in group 2, BioRoot RCS. The reassembled root halves were divided into six experimental and one control groups: 2.5% NaOCl-17% EDTA (Passive ultrasonic irrigation [PUI]), 5% NaOCl/9% DualRinse HEDP (PUI), 2.5% NaOCl-7% Maleic acid (PUI), 2.5% NaOCl-17% EDTA (Er:YAG laser activated irrigation [LAI]), 2.5% NaOCl/9% DualRinse HEDP (LAI), 2.5% NaOCl-7% Maleic acid (LAI), Distilled water (Control). Specimens were scored using SEM. The data were analysed using Kruskal-Wallis and Mann Whitney U tests. Results: Maleic acid and DualRinse HEDP removed higher amounts of MTA Fillapex from the grooves compared to EDTA, when used with both activation methods (p <.001). Conclusions: Ultrasonically activated maleic acid or DualRinse HEDP can be an effective irrigation regimen in removing tricalcium silicate-based sealers.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85070056740&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85070056740&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/jemt.23353

DO - 10.1002/jemt.23353

M3 - Article

C2 - 31368166

AN - SCOPUS:85070056740

VL - 82

SP - 1862

EP - 1868

JO - Microscopy Research and Technique

JF - Microscopy Research and Technique

SN - 1059-910X

IS - 11

ER -