The need for flexibility in the upper limit of gestational age for fetal anomalies in the MTP act

A questionnaire survey

K. Priya Ballal, Raina Chawla, Pralhad Kushtagi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

To elicit opinion of practicing obstetricians regarding the change required in the existing MTP Act with regard to limit of gestational age for terminating pregnancies with fetal anomalies and to obtain suggestions about formation of a regulatory body, a questionnaire survey was carried out amongst the consultant obstetricians spread across the city. The questionnaire sought opinions on whether or not to terminate a pregnancy beyond 24 weeks based on the kind of fetal anomaly diagnosed, need or otherwise for increasing the gestational age limit for considering MTP, how would one react to the situation of managing a live baby following late pregnancy terminations and requirement of a regulatory body and consequences of such an amendment. The questions were a combination of multiple choice and open ended types with options of adding one's own suggestions. Responses were received from 41obstetricians and 90.2% expressed the need for amending the MTP Act to increase limit of gestational age with 24.3% suggesting delinking the age constraint. If the anomaly were to be of uncertain significance or that incompatible with survival, 12.2 to 19.5% responded in favor of refusal to terminate pregnancy if duration of pregnancy was beyond the legally permissible limit. Majority of respondents opted for terminating pregnancy citing maternal reasons (36.6 to 39%), recording lower legally permissible gestational age (24.3 to 36.6%) or recording it as preterm labor-delivery (9.7 to 73.2%). Mothers wish was the prime consideration by 41.5%. Opinion of 53.7% obstetricians was not to resuscitate if baby was born alive and 19.5% opted to ensure prior feticide. Necessity of ombudsman was felt by 68.3% It is concluded that delinking or at least raising the gestational age from the provisions of MTP Act for fetal anomalies is required. It is necessary to have a regulatory body to concur with decision made for termination of pregnancy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)43-49
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of South India Medicolegal Association
Volume5
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 01-09-2013

Fingerprint

Gestational Age
Pregnancy
Mothers
Premature Obstetric Labor
Consultants
Surveys and Questionnaires
Survival

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Cite this

@article{80339370d44e407a949d4350e6a1b6f1,
title = "The need for flexibility in the upper limit of gestational age for fetal anomalies in the MTP act: A questionnaire survey",
abstract = "To elicit opinion of practicing obstetricians regarding the change required in the existing MTP Act with regard to limit of gestational age for terminating pregnancies with fetal anomalies and to obtain suggestions about formation of a regulatory body, a questionnaire survey was carried out amongst the consultant obstetricians spread across the city. The questionnaire sought opinions on whether or not to terminate a pregnancy beyond 24 weeks based on the kind of fetal anomaly diagnosed, need or otherwise for increasing the gestational age limit for considering MTP, how would one react to the situation of managing a live baby following late pregnancy terminations and requirement of a regulatory body and consequences of such an amendment. The questions were a combination of multiple choice and open ended types with options of adding one's own suggestions. Responses were received from 41obstetricians and 90.2{\%} expressed the need for amending the MTP Act to increase limit of gestational age with 24.3{\%} suggesting delinking the age constraint. If the anomaly were to be of uncertain significance or that incompatible with survival, 12.2 to 19.5{\%} responded in favor of refusal to terminate pregnancy if duration of pregnancy was beyond the legally permissible limit. Majority of respondents opted for terminating pregnancy citing maternal reasons (36.6 to 39{\%}), recording lower legally permissible gestational age (24.3 to 36.6{\%}) or recording it as preterm labor-delivery (9.7 to 73.2{\%}). Mothers wish was the prime consideration by 41.5{\%}. Opinion of 53.7{\%} obstetricians was not to resuscitate if baby was born alive and 19.5{\%} opted to ensure prior feticide. Necessity of ombudsman was felt by 68.3{\%} It is concluded that delinking or at least raising the gestational age from the provisions of MTP Act for fetal anomalies is required. It is necessary to have a regulatory body to concur with decision made for termination of pregnancy.",
author = "{Priya Ballal}, K. and Raina Chawla and Pralhad Kushtagi",
year = "2013",
month = "9",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
pages = "43--49",
journal = "Journal of South India Medicolegal Association",
issn = "0974-6196",
publisher = "South India Medicolegal Association",
number = "2",

}

The need for flexibility in the upper limit of gestational age for fetal anomalies in the MTP act : A questionnaire survey. / Priya Ballal, K.; Chawla, Raina; Kushtagi, Pralhad.

In: Journal of South India Medicolegal Association, Vol. 5, No. 2, 01.09.2013, p. 43-49.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The need for flexibility in the upper limit of gestational age for fetal anomalies in the MTP act

T2 - A questionnaire survey

AU - Priya Ballal, K.

AU - Chawla, Raina

AU - Kushtagi, Pralhad

PY - 2013/9/1

Y1 - 2013/9/1

N2 - To elicit opinion of practicing obstetricians regarding the change required in the existing MTP Act with regard to limit of gestational age for terminating pregnancies with fetal anomalies and to obtain suggestions about formation of a regulatory body, a questionnaire survey was carried out amongst the consultant obstetricians spread across the city. The questionnaire sought opinions on whether or not to terminate a pregnancy beyond 24 weeks based on the kind of fetal anomaly diagnosed, need or otherwise for increasing the gestational age limit for considering MTP, how would one react to the situation of managing a live baby following late pregnancy terminations and requirement of a regulatory body and consequences of such an amendment. The questions were a combination of multiple choice and open ended types with options of adding one's own suggestions. Responses were received from 41obstetricians and 90.2% expressed the need for amending the MTP Act to increase limit of gestational age with 24.3% suggesting delinking the age constraint. If the anomaly were to be of uncertain significance or that incompatible with survival, 12.2 to 19.5% responded in favor of refusal to terminate pregnancy if duration of pregnancy was beyond the legally permissible limit. Majority of respondents opted for terminating pregnancy citing maternal reasons (36.6 to 39%), recording lower legally permissible gestational age (24.3 to 36.6%) or recording it as preterm labor-delivery (9.7 to 73.2%). Mothers wish was the prime consideration by 41.5%. Opinion of 53.7% obstetricians was not to resuscitate if baby was born alive and 19.5% opted to ensure prior feticide. Necessity of ombudsman was felt by 68.3% It is concluded that delinking or at least raising the gestational age from the provisions of MTP Act for fetal anomalies is required. It is necessary to have a regulatory body to concur with decision made for termination of pregnancy.

AB - To elicit opinion of practicing obstetricians regarding the change required in the existing MTP Act with regard to limit of gestational age for terminating pregnancies with fetal anomalies and to obtain suggestions about formation of a regulatory body, a questionnaire survey was carried out amongst the consultant obstetricians spread across the city. The questionnaire sought opinions on whether or not to terminate a pregnancy beyond 24 weeks based on the kind of fetal anomaly diagnosed, need or otherwise for increasing the gestational age limit for considering MTP, how would one react to the situation of managing a live baby following late pregnancy terminations and requirement of a regulatory body and consequences of such an amendment. The questions were a combination of multiple choice and open ended types with options of adding one's own suggestions. Responses were received from 41obstetricians and 90.2% expressed the need for amending the MTP Act to increase limit of gestational age with 24.3% suggesting delinking the age constraint. If the anomaly were to be of uncertain significance or that incompatible with survival, 12.2 to 19.5% responded in favor of refusal to terminate pregnancy if duration of pregnancy was beyond the legally permissible limit. Majority of respondents opted for terminating pregnancy citing maternal reasons (36.6 to 39%), recording lower legally permissible gestational age (24.3 to 36.6%) or recording it as preterm labor-delivery (9.7 to 73.2%). Mothers wish was the prime consideration by 41.5%. Opinion of 53.7% obstetricians was not to resuscitate if baby was born alive and 19.5% opted to ensure prior feticide. Necessity of ombudsman was felt by 68.3% It is concluded that delinking or at least raising the gestational age from the provisions of MTP Act for fetal anomalies is required. It is necessary to have a regulatory body to concur with decision made for termination of pregnancy.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84884193494&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84884193494&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 5

SP - 43

EP - 49

JO - Journal of South India Medicolegal Association

JF - Journal of South India Medicolegal Association

SN - 0974-6196

IS - 2

ER -