Theory content, question-behavior effects, or form of delivery effects for intention to become an organ donor? Two randomized trials

Frank Doyle, Karen Morgan, Mary Mathew, Princy Palatty, Prashanti Kamat, Sally Doherty, Jody Quigley, Josh Henderson, Ronan O’carroll

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Eliciting different attitudes with survey questionnaires may impact on intention to donate organs. Previous research used varying numbers of questionnaire items, or different modes of intervention delivery, when comparing groups. We aimed to determine whether intention to donate organs differed among groups exposed to different theoretical content, but similar questionnaire length, in different countries. We tested the effect of excluding affective attitudinal items on intention to donate, using constant item numbers in two modes of intervention delivery. Study 1: A multi-country, interviewer-led, cross-sectional randomized trial recruited 1007 participants, who completed questionnaires as per group assignment: including all affective attitude items, affective attitude items replaced, negatively-worded affective attitude items replaced. Study 2 recruited a UK-representative, cross-sectional sample of 616 participants using an online methodology, randomly assigned to the same conditions. Multilevel models assessed effects of group membership on outcomes: intention to donate (primary), taking a donor card, following a web-link (secondary). In study 1, intention to donate did not differ among groups. Study 2 found a small, significantly higher intention to donate in the negatively-worded affective attitudes replaced group. Combining data yielded no group differences. No differences were seen for secondary outcomes. Ancillary analyses suggest significant interviewer effects. Contrary to previous research, theoretical content may be less relevant than number or valence of questionnaire items, or form of intervention delivery, for increasing intention to donate organs.

Original languageEnglish
Article number1304
JournalInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Volume16
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01-04-2019

Fingerprint

Tissue Donors
Epidemiologic Effect Modifiers
Tissue and Organ Procurement
Research
Surveys and Questionnaires
Interviews

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis

Cite this

Doyle, Frank ; Morgan, Karen ; Mathew, Mary ; Palatty, Princy ; Kamat, Prashanti ; Doherty, Sally ; Quigley, Jody ; Henderson, Josh ; O’carroll, Ronan. / Theory content, question-behavior effects, or form of delivery effects for intention to become an organ donor? Two randomized trials. In: International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2019 ; Vol. 16, No. 7.
@article{3b884244e49d4505b627a43d03d669f2,
title = "Theory content, question-behavior effects, or form of delivery effects for intention to become an organ donor? Two randomized trials",
abstract = "Eliciting different attitudes with survey questionnaires may impact on intention to donate organs. Previous research used varying numbers of questionnaire items, or different modes of intervention delivery, when comparing groups. We aimed to determine whether intention to donate organs differed among groups exposed to different theoretical content, but similar questionnaire length, in different countries. We tested the effect of excluding affective attitudinal items on intention to donate, using constant item numbers in two modes of intervention delivery. Study 1: A multi-country, interviewer-led, cross-sectional randomized trial recruited 1007 participants, who completed questionnaires as per group assignment: including all affective attitude items, affective attitude items replaced, negatively-worded affective attitude items replaced. Study 2 recruited a UK-representative, cross-sectional sample of 616 participants using an online methodology, randomly assigned to the same conditions. Multilevel models assessed effects of group membership on outcomes: intention to donate (primary), taking a donor card, following a web-link (secondary). In study 1, intention to donate did not differ among groups. Study 2 found a small, significantly higher intention to donate in the negatively-worded affective attitudes replaced group. Combining data yielded no group differences. No differences were seen for secondary outcomes. Ancillary analyses suggest significant interviewer effects. Contrary to previous research, theoretical content may be less relevant than number or valence of questionnaire items, or form of intervention delivery, for increasing intention to donate organs.",
author = "Frank Doyle and Karen Morgan and Mary Mathew and Princy Palatty and Prashanti Kamat and Sally Doherty and Jody Quigley and Josh Henderson and Ronan O’carroll",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3390/ijerph16071304",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
journal = "International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health",
issn = "1661-7827",
publisher = "Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)",
number = "7",

}

Theory content, question-behavior effects, or form of delivery effects for intention to become an organ donor? Two randomized trials. / Doyle, Frank; Morgan, Karen; Mathew, Mary; Palatty, Princy; Kamat, Prashanti; Doherty, Sally; Quigley, Jody; Henderson, Josh; O’carroll, Ronan.

In: International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Vol. 16, No. 7, 1304, 01.04.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Theory content, question-behavior effects, or form of delivery effects for intention to become an organ donor? Two randomized trials

AU - Doyle, Frank

AU - Morgan, Karen

AU - Mathew, Mary

AU - Palatty, Princy

AU - Kamat, Prashanti

AU - Doherty, Sally

AU - Quigley, Jody

AU - Henderson, Josh

AU - O’carroll, Ronan

PY - 2019/4/1

Y1 - 2019/4/1

N2 - Eliciting different attitudes with survey questionnaires may impact on intention to donate organs. Previous research used varying numbers of questionnaire items, or different modes of intervention delivery, when comparing groups. We aimed to determine whether intention to donate organs differed among groups exposed to different theoretical content, but similar questionnaire length, in different countries. We tested the effect of excluding affective attitudinal items on intention to donate, using constant item numbers in two modes of intervention delivery. Study 1: A multi-country, interviewer-led, cross-sectional randomized trial recruited 1007 participants, who completed questionnaires as per group assignment: including all affective attitude items, affective attitude items replaced, negatively-worded affective attitude items replaced. Study 2 recruited a UK-representative, cross-sectional sample of 616 participants using an online methodology, randomly assigned to the same conditions. Multilevel models assessed effects of group membership on outcomes: intention to donate (primary), taking a donor card, following a web-link (secondary). In study 1, intention to donate did not differ among groups. Study 2 found a small, significantly higher intention to donate in the negatively-worded affective attitudes replaced group. Combining data yielded no group differences. No differences were seen for secondary outcomes. Ancillary analyses suggest significant interviewer effects. Contrary to previous research, theoretical content may be less relevant than number or valence of questionnaire items, or form of intervention delivery, for increasing intention to donate organs.

AB - Eliciting different attitudes with survey questionnaires may impact on intention to donate organs. Previous research used varying numbers of questionnaire items, or different modes of intervention delivery, when comparing groups. We aimed to determine whether intention to donate organs differed among groups exposed to different theoretical content, but similar questionnaire length, in different countries. We tested the effect of excluding affective attitudinal items on intention to donate, using constant item numbers in two modes of intervention delivery. Study 1: A multi-country, interviewer-led, cross-sectional randomized trial recruited 1007 participants, who completed questionnaires as per group assignment: including all affective attitude items, affective attitude items replaced, negatively-worded affective attitude items replaced. Study 2 recruited a UK-representative, cross-sectional sample of 616 participants using an online methodology, randomly assigned to the same conditions. Multilevel models assessed effects of group membership on outcomes: intention to donate (primary), taking a donor card, following a web-link (secondary). In study 1, intention to donate did not differ among groups. Study 2 found a small, significantly higher intention to donate in the negatively-worded affective attitudes replaced group. Combining data yielded no group differences. No differences were seen for secondary outcomes. Ancillary analyses suggest significant interviewer effects. Contrary to previous research, theoretical content may be less relevant than number or valence of questionnaire items, or form of intervention delivery, for increasing intention to donate organs.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064818383&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85064818383&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3390/ijerph16071304

DO - 10.3390/ijerph16071304

M3 - Article

C2 - 30979026

AN - SCOPUS:85064818383

VL - 16

JO - International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

JF - International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

SN - 1661-7827

IS - 7

M1 - 1304

ER -