Thermal studies on different classes of clinical dental composites

S. Sampath, S. R. Girish

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Various classes of dental composites have evolved over the years for various clinical applications, differing mainly in the relative proportions of their individual components (BisGMA, TEGDMA, UDMA, fillers, etc.). Four classes of composites have been investigated here via DSC and TG (after curing with blue light from a halogen light-curing unit): a 'microhybrid', a 'nanocomposite', a 'flowable' and a 'fluoride-releasing' variety. The aims were to compare various thermal properties amongst the four classes and also to compare the quality of polymerization of halogen light cure. We concluded that the DSC scans of all the polymers showed no exotherms, signifying the absence of any residual reactivity. However, the scans showed onset of endothermic regions before glass transition temperature (GTT), which may signify structural rearrangements within the polymers. The overall enthalpy ranged from -1.4 to -50 J g-1, with significant differences between the 'fluoride-releasing' variety and the rest. The 'fluoride-releasing' variety showed the largest endotherm, signifying greater mass loss than the rest. The GTT (129 C) did not differ significantly amongst the composite types. These same parameters, on a second DSC run of the same samples, followed a pattern similar to the first run, albeit to a lesser degree in magnitude. Hence, no benefit was gained by heating after the initial 'light' cure. The initial and total mass losses were higher for 'fluoride-releasing' (19 and 46%) and 'flowable' (12 and 38%) types compared to 'microhybrid' (3 and 24%) and 'nanocomposite' (4 and 20%). In a clinical scenario, the 'fluoride-releasing' composite may adequately photopolymerize, given its use in thin layers. The microhybrid and nanocomposites might also polymerize well in thinner layers without the need for a secondary heat treatment. The 'flowable' variety on the other hand, is not recommended to be subjected to a secondary heat treatment, due to its inferior thermal stability.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)219-225
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry
Volume111
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01-2013

Fingerprint

Dental composites
releasing
Fluorides
fluorides
composite materials
Nanocomposites
nanocomposites
Halogens
curing
halogens
glass transition temperature
Curing
Polymers
Composite materials
heat treatment
Heat treatment
polymers
fillers
Fillers
Enthalpy

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Condensed Matter Physics
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry

Cite this

Sampath, S. ; Girish, S. R. / Thermal studies on different classes of clinical dental composites. In: Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry. 2013 ; Vol. 111, No. 1. pp. 219-225.
@article{4ac08585df9b4fb98fdb38304cd922f9,
title = "Thermal studies on different classes of clinical dental composites",
abstract = "Various classes of dental composites have evolved over the years for various clinical applications, differing mainly in the relative proportions of their individual components (BisGMA, TEGDMA, UDMA, fillers, etc.). Four classes of composites have been investigated here via DSC and TG (after curing with blue light from a halogen light-curing unit): a 'microhybrid', a 'nanocomposite', a 'flowable' and a 'fluoride-releasing' variety. The aims were to compare various thermal properties amongst the four classes and also to compare the quality of polymerization of halogen light cure. We concluded that the DSC scans of all the polymers showed no exotherms, signifying the absence of any residual reactivity. However, the scans showed onset of endothermic regions before glass transition temperature (GTT), which may signify structural rearrangements within the polymers. The overall enthalpy ranged from -1.4 to -50 J g-1, with significant differences between the 'fluoride-releasing' variety and the rest. The 'fluoride-releasing' variety showed the largest endotherm, signifying greater mass loss than the rest. The GTT (129 C) did not differ significantly amongst the composite types. These same parameters, on a second DSC run of the same samples, followed a pattern similar to the first run, albeit to a lesser degree in magnitude. Hence, no benefit was gained by heating after the initial 'light' cure. The initial and total mass losses were higher for 'fluoride-releasing' (19 and 46{\%}) and 'flowable' (12 and 38{\%}) types compared to 'microhybrid' (3 and 24{\%}) and 'nanocomposite' (4 and 20{\%}). In a clinical scenario, the 'fluoride-releasing' composite may adequately photopolymerize, given its use in thin layers. The microhybrid and nanocomposites might also polymerize well in thinner layers without the need for a secondary heat treatment. The 'flowable' variety on the other hand, is not recommended to be subjected to a secondary heat treatment, due to its inferior thermal stability.",
author = "S. Sampath and Girish, {S. R.}",
year = "2013",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10973-012-2243-4",
language = "English",
volume = "111",
pages = "219--225",
journal = "Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry",
issn = "1388-6150",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "1",

}

Thermal studies on different classes of clinical dental composites. / Sampath, S.; Girish, S. R.

In: Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, Vol. 111, No. 1, 01.2013, p. 219-225.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Thermal studies on different classes of clinical dental composites

AU - Sampath, S.

AU - Girish, S. R.

PY - 2013/1

Y1 - 2013/1

N2 - Various classes of dental composites have evolved over the years for various clinical applications, differing mainly in the relative proportions of their individual components (BisGMA, TEGDMA, UDMA, fillers, etc.). Four classes of composites have been investigated here via DSC and TG (after curing with blue light from a halogen light-curing unit): a 'microhybrid', a 'nanocomposite', a 'flowable' and a 'fluoride-releasing' variety. The aims were to compare various thermal properties amongst the four classes and also to compare the quality of polymerization of halogen light cure. We concluded that the DSC scans of all the polymers showed no exotherms, signifying the absence of any residual reactivity. However, the scans showed onset of endothermic regions before glass transition temperature (GTT), which may signify structural rearrangements within the polymers. The overall enthalpy ranged from -1.4 to -50 J g-1, with significant differences between the 'fluoride-releasing' variety and the rest. The 'fluoride-releasing' variety showed the largest endotherm, signifying greater mass loss than the rest. The GTT (129 C) did not differ significantly amongst the composite types. These same parameters, on a second DSC run of the same samples, followed a pattern similar to the first run, albeit to a lesser degree in magnitude. Hence, no benefit was gained by heating after the initial 'light' cure. The initial and total mass losses were higher for 'fluoride-releasing' (19 and 46%) and 'flowable' (12 and 38%) types compared to 'microhybrid' (3 and 24%) and 'nanocomposite' (4 and 20%). In a clinical scenario, the 'fluoride-releasing' composite may adequately photopolymerize, given its use in thin layers. The microhybrid and nanocomposites might also polymerize well in thinner layers without the need for a secondary heat treatment. The 'flowable' variety on the other hand, is not recommended to be subjected to a secondary heat treatment, due to its inferior thermal stability.

AB - Various classes of dental composites have evolved over the years for various clinical applications, differing mainly in the relative proportions of their individual components (BisGMA, TEGDMA, UDMA, fillers, etc.). Four classes of composites have been investigated here via DSC and TG (after curing with blue light from a halogen light-curing unit): a 'microhybrid', a 'nanocomposite', a 'flowable' and a 'fluoride-releasing' variety. The aims were to compare various thermal properties amongst the four classes and also to compare the quality of polymerization of halogen light cure. We concluded that the DSC scans of all the polymers showed no exotherms, signifying the absence of any residual reactivity. However, the scans showed onset of endothermic regions before glass transition temperature (GTT), which may signify structural rearrangements within the polymers. The overall enthalpy ranged from -1.4 to -50 J g-1, with significant differences between the 'fluoride-releasing' variety and the rest. The 'fluoride-releasing' variety showed the largest endotherm, signifying greater mass loss than the rest. The GTT (129 C) did not differ significantly amongst the composite types. These same parameters, on a second DSC run of the same samples, followed a pattern similar to the first run, albeit to a lesser degree in magnitude. Hence, no benefit was gained by heating after the initial 'light' cure. The initial and total mass losses were higher for 'fluoride-releasing' (19 and 46%) and 'flowable' (12 and 38%) types compared to 'microhybrid' (3 and 24%) and 'nanocomposite' (4 and 20%). In a clinical scenario, the 'fluoride-releasing' composite may adequately photopolymerize, given its use in thin layers. The microhybrid and nanocomposites might also polymerize well in thinner layers without the need for a secondary heat treatment. The 'flowable' variety on the other hand, is not recommended to be subjected to a secondary heat treatment, due to its inferior thermal stability.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84872501712&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84872501712&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10973-012-2243-4

DO - 10.1007/s10973-012-2243-4

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84872501712

VL - 111

SP - 219

EP - 225

JO - Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry

JF - Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry

SN - 1388-6150

IS - 1

ER -