Abstract

Purpose: The biomechanical behavior of the two-implant-supported overdenture was compared with that of four-implant supported mandibular overdenture using the three dimensional finite element method (FEM). Thereby evaluating the von Misses stresses induced on the implants under different loading simulations. Materials & Method: Three dimensional models representing mandible restored with two-implant-supported and four-implant-supported prosthesis were developed in the three dimensional design software and then transferred into FEM software. The models were then subjected to four different loading simulations (full mouth biting, canine disclusion, load on cantilever, load in the absence of cantilever). The maximum von Mises stresses were localized and quantified for comparison.1 Results: Among the three models, under all loading simulations, the maximum stress concentrations were along the neck of the implant. The stress levels for full mouth loading simulation was highest for two implant supported overdenture design when compared with the four implant retained overdenture design. In both the designs, the least stress was when the implants were loaded in a lateral direction. The stress levels for cantilever and non-cantilevered designs were nearly the same for all the simulated designs. Conclusion: When tested under different loading simulations, both models showed similar location and distribution of stress patterns. Thus from the study it can be concluded that the four implant retained over denture design is a better treatment option for the atrophic edentulous ridges and induces comparatively less amount of stresses on the edentulous ridges. Therefore the overall longevity of the prosthesis is greatly enhanced.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)126-131
Number of pages6
JournalIndian Journal of Public Health Research and Development
Volume9
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01-11-2018

Fingerprint

Overlay Denture
Finite Element Analysis
Prostheses and Implants
Mouth
Denture Design
Software Design
Mandible
Canidae
Neck
Software

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

@article{28e1b8a929e240f48f7020bd612b5e10,
title = "Three dimensional finite element stress analysis of two and four implant supported prosthesis",
abstract = "Purpose: The biomechanical behavior of the two-implant-supported overdenture was compared with that of four-implant supported mandibular overdenture using the three dimensional finite element method (FEM). Thereby evaluating the von Misses stresses induced on the implants under different loading simulations. Materials & Method: Three dimensional models representing mandible restored with two-implant-supported and four-implant-supported prosthesis were developed in the three dimensional design software and then transferred into FEM software. The models were then subjected to four different loading simulations (full mouth biting, canine disclusion, load on cantilever, load in the absence of cantilever). The maximum von Mises stresses were localized and quantified for comparison.1 Results: Among the three models, under all loading simulations, the maximum stress concentrations were along the neck of the implant. The stress levels for full mouth loading simulation was highest for two implant supported overdenture design when compared with the four implant retained overdenture design. In both the designs, the least stress was when the implants were loaded in a lateral direction. The stress levels for cantilever and non-cantilevered designs were nearly the same for all the simulated designs. Conclusion: When tested under different loading simulations, both models showed similar location and distribution of stress patterns. Thus from the study it can be concluded that the four implant retained over denture design is a better treatment option for the atrophic edentulous ridges and induces comparatively less amount of stresses on the edentulous ridges. Therefore the overall longevity of the prosthesis is greatly enhanced.",
author = "Puneeth Hegde and B. Dhanasekar and Satish Shenoy and Aparna, {I. N.} and Lokendra Gupta and Y. Umesh and M. Mahesh",
year = "2018",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.5958/0976-5506.2018.01438.9",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "126--131",
journal = "Indian Journal of Public Health Research and Development",
issn = "0976-0245",
publisher = "R.K. Sharma, Institute of Medico-Legal Publications",
number = "11",

}

Three dimensional finite element stress analysis of two and four implant supported prosthesis. / Hegde, Puneeth; Dhanasekar, B.; Shenoy, Satish; Aparna, I. N.; Gupta, Lokendra; Umesh, Y.; Mahesh, M.

In: Indian Journal of Public Health Research and Development, Vol. 9, No. 11, 01.11.2018, p. 126-131.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Three dimensional finite element stress analysis of two and four implant supported prosthesis

AU - Hegde, Puneeth

AU - Dhanasekar, B.

AU - Shenoy, Satish

AU - Aparna, I. N.

AU - Gupta, Lokendra

AU - Umesh, Y.

AU - Mahesh, M.

PY - 2018/11/1

Y1 - 2018/11/1

N2 - Purpose: The biomechanical behavior of the two-implant-supported overdenture was compared with that of four-implant supported mandibular overdenture using the three dimensional finite element method (FEM). Thereby evaluating the von Misses stresses induced on the implants under different loading simulations. Materials & Method: Three dimensional models representing mandible restored with two-implant-supported and four-implant-supported prosthesis were developed in the three dimensional design software and then transferred into FEM software. The models were then subjected to four different loading simulations (full mouth biting, canine disclusion, load on cantilever, load in the absence of cantilever). The maximum von Mises stresses were localized and quantified for comparison.1 Results: Among the three models, under all loading simulations, the maximum stress concentrations were along the neck of the implant. The stress levels for full mouth loading simulation was highest for two implant supported overdenture design when compared with the four implant retained overdenture design. In both the designs, the least stress was when the implants were loaded in a lateral direction. The stress levels for cantilever and non-cantilevered designs were nearly the same for all the simulated designs. Conclusion: When tested under different loading simulations, both models showed similar location and distribution of stress patterns. Thus from the study it can be concluded that the four implant retained over denture design is a better treatment option for the atrophic edentulous ridges and induces comparatively less amount of stresses on the edentulous ridges. Therefore the overall longevity of the prosthesis is greatly enhanced.

AB - Purpose: The biomechanical behavior of the two-implant-supported overdenture was compared with that of four-implant supported mandibular overdenture using the three dimensional finite element method (FEM). Thereby evaluating the von Misses stresses induced on the implants under different loading simulations. Materials & Method: Three dimensional models representing mandible restored with two-implant-supported and four-implant-supported prosthesis were developed in the three dimensional design software and then transferred into FEM software. The models were then subjected to four different loading simulations (full mouth biting, canine disclusion, load on cantilever, load in the absence of cantilever). The maximum von Mises stresses were localized and quantified for comparison.1 Results: Among the three models, under all loading simulations, the maximum stress concentrations were along the neck of the implant. The stress levels for full mouth loading simulation was highest for two implant supported overdenture design when compared with the four implant retained overdenture design. In both the designs, the least stress was when the implants were loaded in a lateral direction. The stress levels for cantilever and non-cantilevered designs were nearly the same for all the simulated designs. Conclusion: When tested under different loading simulations, both models showed similar location and distribution of stress patterns. Thus from the study it can be concluded that the four implant retained over denture design is a better treatment option for the atrophic edentulous ridges and induces comparatively less amount of stresses on the edentulous ridges. Therefore the overall longevity of the prosthesis is greatly enhanced.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85058193590&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85058193590&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5958/0976-5506.2018.01438.9

DO - 10.5958/0976-5506.2018.01438.9

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85058193590

VL - 9

SP - 126

EP - 131

JO - Indian Journal of Public Health Research and Development

JF - Indian Journal of Public Health Research and Development

SN - 0976-0245

IS - 11

ER -