Treatment of infected non-unions with segmental defects with a rail fixation system

Srikanth Mudiganty, Arup Kumar Daolagupu, Arun Kumar Sipani, Satyendra Kumar Das, Arijit Dhar, Parag Jyoti Gogoi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We conducted this study to evaluate the use of rail fixation system in infected gap non-union of femur and tibia as an alternative to the established Ilizarov circular fixator technique. Prospective study. The study was done in the Department of Orthopaedic surgery in a medical school and level I trauma center to which the authors are/were affiliated. Between June 2010 and June 2015, 40 patients with infected gap non-union of femur and tibia were treated with the rail fixation system. Patients who were willing to undergo surgery and participate in the post-operative rehabilitation were included in the study. After radical debridement, the system was applied and corticotomy done. For closure of bone gap, acute docking and distraction was done in 18 cases and segmental bone transport in 22 cases. Early mobilization of patient was done along with aggressive physiotherapy. Bone and functional results were calculated according to ASAMI scoring system, and complications were classified according to Paley classification. The mean follow-up period was 22.56 months (range 8–44). Bone union with eradication of infection was achieved in all but 1 case (97.5%). Bone results were excellent in 57.5%, good 40%, fair 0% and poor in 2.5% cases, while functional result was excellent in 32.5%, good 65%, fair 0% and poor in 2.5% cases. The rail fixation system is an excellent alternative method to treat infected gap non-union of femur and tibia. It is simple, easy to use and patient-friendly.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)45-51
Number of pages7
JournalStrategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction
Volume12
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01-04-2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Bone and Bones
Tibia
Femur
Therapeutics
Early Ambulation
Trauma Centers
Debridement
Medical Schools
Orthopedics
Rehabilitation
Prospective Studies
Infection

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Mudiganty, Srikanth ; Daolagupu, Arup Kumar ; Sipani, Arun Kumar ; Das, Satyendra Kumar ; Dhar, Arijit ; Gogoi, Parag Jyoti. / Treatment of infected non-unions with segmental defects with a rail fixation system. In: Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction. 2017 ; Vol. 12, No. 1. pp. 45-51.
@article{322828577bae445584182228f25fcf36,
title = "Treatment of infected non-unions with segmental defects with a rail fixation system",
abstract = "We conducted this study to evaluate the use of rail fixation system in infected gap non-union of femur and tibia as an alternative to the established Ilizarov circular fixator technique. Prospective study. The study was done in the Department of Orthopaedic surgery in a medical school and level I trauma center to which the authors are/were affiliated. Between June 2010 and June 2015, 40 patients with infected gap non-union of femur and tibia were treated with the rail fixation system. Patients who were willing to undergo surgery and participate in the post-operative rehabilitation were included in the study. After radical debridement, the system was applied and corticotomy done. For closure of bone gap, acute docking and distraction was done in 18 cases and segmental bone transport in 22 cases. Early mobilization of patient was done along with aggressive physiotherapy. Bone and functional results were calculated according to ASAMI scoring system, and complications were classified according to Paley classification. The mean follow-up period was 22.56 months (range 8–44). Bone union with eradication of infection was achieved in all but 1 case (97.5{\%}). Bone results were excellent in 57.5{\%}, good 40{\%}, fair 0{\%} and poor in 2.5{\%} cases, while functional result was excellent in 32.5{\%}, good 65{\%}, fair 0{\%} and poor in 2.5{\%} cases. The rail fixation system is an excellent alternative method to treat infected gap non-union of femur and tibia. It is simple, easy to use and patient-friendly.",
author = "Srikanth Mudiganty and Daolagupu, {Arup Kumar} and Sipani, {Arun Kumar} and Das, {Satyendra Kumar} and Arijit Dhar and Gogoi, {Parag Jyoti}",
year = "2017",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11751-017-0278-6",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "45--51",
journal = "Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction",
issn = "1828-8936",
publisher = "Springer-Verlag Italia",
number = "1",

}

Treatment of infected non-unions with segmental defects with a rail fixation system. / Mudiganty, Srikanth; Daolagupu, Arup Kumar; Sipani, Arun Kumar; Das, Satyendra Kumar; Dhar, Arijit; Gogoi, Parag Jyoti.

In: Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction, Vol. 12, No. 1, 01.04.2017, p. 45-51.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Treatment of infected non-unions with segmental defects with a rail fixation system

AU - Mudiganty, Srikanth

AU - Daolagupu, Arup Kumar

AU - Sipani, Arun Kumar

AU - Das, Satyendra Kumar

AU - Dhar, Arijit

AU - Gogoi, Parag Jyoti

PY - 2017/4/1

Y1 - 2017/4/1

N2 - We conducted this study to evaluate the use of rail fixation system in infected gap non-union of femur and tibia as an alternative to the established Ilizarov circular fixator technique. Prospective study. The study was done in the Department of Orthopaedic surgery in a medical school and level I trauma center to which the authors are/were affiliated. Between June 2010 and June 2015, 40 patients with infected gap non-union of femur and tibia were treated with the rail fixation system. Patients who were willing to undergo surgery and participate in the post-operative rehabilitation were included in the study. After radical debridement, the system was applied and corticotomy done. For closure of bone gap, acute docking and distraction was done in 18 cases and segmental bone transport in 22 cases. Early mobilization of patient was done along with aggressive physiotherapy. Bone and functional results were calculated according to ASAMI scoring system, and complications were classified according to Paley classification. The mean follow-up period was 22.56 months (range 8–44). Bone union with eradication of infection was achieved in all but 1 case (97.5%). Bone results were excellent in 57.5%, good 40%, fair 0% and poor in 2.5% cases, while functional result was excellent in 32.5%, good 65%, fair 0% and poor in 2.5% cases. The rail fixation system is an excellent alternative method to treat infected gap non-union of femur and tibia. It is simple, easy to use and patient-friendly.

AB - We conducted this study to evaluate the use of rail fixation system in infected gap non-union of femur and tibia as an alternative to the established Ilizarov circular fixator technique. Prospective study. The study was done in the Department of Orthopaedic surgery in a medical school and level I trauma center to which the authors are/were affiliated. Between June 2010 and June 2015, 40 patients with infected gap non-union of femur and tibia were treated with the rail fixation system. Patients who were willing to undergo surgery and participate in the post-operative rehabilitation were included in the study. After radical debridement, the system was applied and corticotomy done. For closure of bone gap, acute docking and distraction was done in 18 cases and segmental bone transport in 22 cases. Early mobilization of patient was done along with aggressive physiotherapy. Bone and functional results were calculated according to ASAMI scoring system, and complications were classified according to Paley classification. The mean follow-up period was 22.56 months (range 8–44). Bone union with eradication of infection was achieved in all but 1 case (97.5%). Bone results were excellent in 57.5%, good 40%, fair 0% and poor in 2.5% cases, while functional result was excellent in 32.5%, good 65%, fair 0% and poor in 2.5% cases. The rail fixation system is an excellent alternative method to treat infected gap non-union of femur and tibia. It is simple, easy to use and patient-friendly.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85013782456&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85013782456&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11751-017-0278-6

DO - 10.1007/s11751-017-0278-6

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 45

EP - 51

JO - Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction

JF - Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction

SN - 1828-8936

IS - 1

ER -