TY - JOUR
T1 - Two manoeuvres to facilitate the oral insertion of LMA CTrach™
AU - Krishna, Handattu
AU - Joseph, Nandhini
AU - Pavani, Karri
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications. All rights reserved.
Copyright:
Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2020/12
Y1 - 2020/12
N2 - Background and Aims: LMA CTrachTM, a new intubating conduit, has a thicker shaft compared to that of the intubating laryngeal mask airway (ILMA) due to the embedded optical fibres of the system. This causes difficulty during insertion despite normal mouth opening. Utility of two manoeuvres to overcome this was evaluated. Methods: From our experience with LMA CTrachTMwe found that two manoeuvres can be helpful to facilitate the insertion of LMA (a) dorsal and downward pressure over the shaft at the point where it hinges against the incisors while continuing the one handed rotational insertion of LMA (b) Lateral insertion of the LMA till the cuff is inside the oral cavity and then rotation of the LMA by 90° and then complete the insertion. A retrospective analysis of 200 insertions of LMA CTrachTMwas done to evaluate the utility of these manoeuvres. Results: Out of 200 insertions, 15 were found to be difficult. Manoeuvre 'a' was applied in 13 cases to facilitate the insertion and manoeuvre 'b' was applied in 2 cases where insertion was not possible despite manoeuvre 'a'. Insertion was successful in these cases after the application of the described manoeuvres. Conclusion: The two manoeuvres described above can be useful when LMA CTrachTMinsertion into the oral cavity is obstructed by the incisor teeth.
AB - Background and Aims: LMA CTrachTM, a new intubating conduit, has a thicker shaft compared to that of the intubating laryngeal mask airway (ILMA) due to the embedded optical fibres of the system. This causes difficulty during insertion despite normal mouth opening. Utility of two manoeuvres to overcome this was evaluated. Methods: From our experience with LMA CTrachTMwe found that two manoeuvres can be helpful to facilitate the insertion of LMA (a) dorsal and downward pressure over the shaft at the point where it hinges against the incisors while continuing the one handed rotational insertion of LMA (b) Lateral insertion of the LMA till the cuff is inside the oral cavity and then rotation of the LMA by 90° and then complete the insertion. A retrospective analysis of 200 insertions of LMA CTrachTMwas done to evaluate the utility of these manoeuvres. Results: Out of 200 insertions, 15 were found to be difficult. Manoeuvre 'a' was applied in 13 cases to facilitate the insertion and manoeuvre 'b' was applied in 2 cases where insertion was not possible despite manoeuvre 'a'. Insertion was successful in these cases after the application of the described manoeuvres. Conclusion: The two manoeuvres described above can be useful when LMA CTrachTMinsertion into the oral cavity is obstructed by the incisor teeth.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85098224697&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85098224697&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.4103/ija.IJA_515_20
DO - 10.4103/ija.IJA_515_20
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85098224697
SN - 0019-5049
VL - 64
SP - 1064
EP - 1066
JO - Indian Journal of Anaesthesia
JF - Indian Journal of Anaesthesia
IS - 12
ER -