Utility of various bronchoscopic modalities in lung cancer diagnosis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Bronchoscopy and different techniques to obtain tissue sample form the cornerstone of lung cancer diagnostics. The utility, specificity and sensitivity of various techniques are compared against each other and also in relation to the tumour type, location and morphology. Aim: To assess and compare the utility of various bronchoscopic procedures in lung malignancies. Study also compares the utility of these techniques on tumour site, morphology and cell type. Methods: One hundred and fifty six patients with suspected malignancies in whom bronchoscopy was deemed as the primary diagnostic procedure were selected. These patients underwent bronchoscopic lavage, brushings and biopsy. Samples were assessed by microbiological, cytology and histopathological analysis. Results: Bronchoscopic procedures have a high diagnostic accuracy of 81.25% in confirming lung malignancies in central tumours and also in non-accessible peripheral tumours. Bronchial brushings had the highest yield in central tumours (55.9%) and a reasonably good yield even in perpipheral tumours (40.8%). When all the modalities were compared against each other, brushings was the single most decisive technique as it alone yielded a diagnosis in a significant 33% of cases, whereas the comparative diagnosis by biopsy alone was in a minority 7.6% of cases.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1931-1936
Number of pages6
JournalAsian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
Volume18
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01-07-2017

Fingerprint

Lung Neoplasms
Neoplasms
Bronchoscopy
Biopsy
Lung
Therapeutic Irrigation
Cell Biology
Sensitivity and Specificity

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Epidemiology
  • Oncology
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Cancer Research

Cite this

@article{d2e509b1566e4922b1d57d63232a43b9,
title = "Utility of various bronchoscopic modalities in lung cancer diagnosis",
abstract = "Background: Bronchoscopy and different techniques to obtain tissue sample form the cornerstone of lung cancer diagnostics. The utility, specificity and sensitivity of various techniques are compared against each other and also in relation to the tumour type, location and morphology. Aim: To assess and compare the utility of various bronchoscopic procedures in lung malignancies. Study also compares the utility of these techniques on tumour site, morphology and cell type. Methods: One hundred and fifty six patients with suspected malignancies in whom bronchoscopy was deemed as the primary diagnostic procedure were selected. These patients underwent bronchoscopic lavage, brushings and biopsy. Samples were assessed by microbiological, cytology and histopathological analysis. Results: Bronchoscopic procedures have a high diagnostic accuracy of 81.25{\%} in confirming lung malignancies in central tumours and also in non-accessible peripheral tumours. Bronchial brushings had the highest yield in central tumours (55.9{\%}) and a reasonably good yield even in perpipheral tumours (40.8{\%}). When all the modalities were compared against each other, brushings was the single most decisive technique as it alone yielded a diagnosis in a significant 33{\%} of cases, whereas the comparative diagnosis by biopsy alone was in a minority 7.6{\%} of cases.",
author = "Acharya, {K. Vishak} and B. Unnikrishnan and Archana Shenoy and Ramesh Holla",
year = "2017",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.22034/APJCP.2017.18.7.1931",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "1931--1936",
journal = "Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention",
issn = "1513-7368",
publisher = "Asian Pacific Organization for Cancer Prevention",
number = "7",

}

Utility of various bronchoscopic modalities in lung cancer diagnosis. / Acharya, K. Vishak; Unnikrishnan, B.; Shenoy, Archana; Holla, Ramesh.

In: Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, Vol. 18, No. 7, 01.07.2017, p. 1931-1936.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Utility of various bronchoscopic modalities in lung cancer diagnosis

AU - Acharya, K. Vishak

AU - Unnikrishnan, B.

AU - Shenoy, Archana

AU - Holla, Ramesh

PY - 2017/7/1

Y1 - 2017/7/1

N2 - Background: Bronchoscopy and different techniques to obtain tissue sample form the cornerstone of lung cancer diagnostics. The utility, specificity and sensitivity of various techniques are compared against each other and also in relation to the tumour type, location and morphology. Aim: To assess and compare the utility of various bronchoscopic procedures in lung malignancies. Study also compares the utility of these techniques on tumour site, morphology and cell type. Methods: One hundred and fifty six patients with suspected malignancies in whom bronchoscopy was deemed as the primary diagnostic procedure were selected. These patients underwent bronchoscopic lavage, brushings and biopsy. Samples were assessed by microbiological, cytology and histopathological analysis. Results: Bronchoscopic procedures have a high diagnostic accuracy of 81.25% in confirming lung malignancies in central tumours and also in non-accessible peripheral tumours. Bronchial brushings had the highest yield in central tumours (55.9%) and a reasonably good yield even in perpipheral tumours (40.8%). When all the modalities were compared against each other, brushings was the single most decisive technique as it alone yielded a diagnosis in a significant 33% of cases, whereas the comparative diagnosis by biopsy alone was in a minority 7.6% of cases.

AB - Background: Bronchoscopy and different techniques to obtain tissue sample form the cornerstone of lung cancer diagnostics. The utility, specificity and sensitivity of various techniques are compared against each other and also in relation to the tumour type, location and morphology. Aim: To assess and compare the utility of various bronchoscopic procedures in lung malignancies. Study also compares the utility of these techniques on tumour site, morphology and cell type. Methods: One hundred and fifty six patients with suspected malignancies in whom bronchoscopy was deemed as the primary diagnostic procedure were selected. These patients underwent bronchoscopic lavage, brushings and biopsy. Samples were assessed by microbiological, cytology and histopathological analysis. Results: Bronchoscopic procedures have a high diagnostic accuracy of 81.25% in confirming lung malignancies in central tumours and also in non-accessible peripheral tumours. Bronchial brushings had the highest yield in central tumours (55.9%) and a reasonably good yield even in perpipheral tumours (40.8%). When all the modalities were compared against each other, brushings was the single most decisive technique as it alone yielded a diagnosis in a significant 33% of cases, whereas the comparative diagnosis by biopsy alone was in a minority 7.6% of cases.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85026258197&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85026258197&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.22034/APJCP.2017.18.7.1931

DO - 10.22034/APJCP.2017.18.7.1931

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 1931

EP - 1936

JO - Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention

JF - Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention

SN - 1513-7368

IS - 7

ER -